Sitting-Bull's blog

CNN plugs for 911blogger- via the Doomsday Plane- bigtime.

A recent (september 12,2007) report from anderson cooper's 360 program, where they re-visit the "mystery plane" that flew over the white house on 9/11.


BTW: That's the third time I've heard Hamilton saying "we found no evidence". A broken record? Studied? Did they search for this issue? Finding no evidence is not hard to imagine if you didn't search for it.


Lee Hamilton, CBS 2006

Well, of course, we did deal with it. The charge that dynamite, or whatever, brought down the World Trade Towers, we of course looked at very carefully - ]we find no evidence of that.

Lee Hamilton, Washington Journal, C-SPAN, 2005

"the Commission had found zero evidence that our government planned that attack."

German ZDF docu arouse my suspicion- new explanation for the WTC collapse in the making

Quick overview:

I think there are hints for growing suspicion that a new explanation for the WTC collapse is in the making, missing fire protection.

Please read the whole post to make your own opinion about that:


The german channel ZDF (Second German Television, a state backed media) will send a documentary that journalists Michael Renz made together with that BBC hitpiece producer Guy Smith back in february on the sixth anniversary next tuesday, 9/11, 20:15-21:00 Central European Time.

Here's a translation of the announcement, translated by loosechange forum member Front242:


Censorship by the media- even in "live" transmissions

I've just read that Rosie O'Donell's show "The View" was normally pre-taped and then broadcasted with a few days delay, but occasionally it was really live.


One of the primary reasons why O'Donnell rejected ABC's contract offer was because the show's Neo-Con producer, Bill Geddie, was continually editing her statements and censoring what could be broadcast. The View is normally pre-taped and aired the next day but occasionally on Tuesdays or Thursdays the broadcast goes out live. Sources tell us that O'Donnell would choose the live show to make statements about 9/11, but that after the initial furore, Geddie even resorted to inserting a delay between the recording and the transmission so that he could live edit controversial statements he didn't like.


This delay can be only a few seconds to some minutes, and usually we may not even notice. As the show still may be announced as "live".

And who brought us this?
Right, it was "Nipplegate", Janet Jacksons "shocking" showing of her "naked" breast.

Fascist America, in 10 easy steps

Here is an excellent analysis of fascism in general compared to the situation in the US today.,,2064157,00.html

But: Unfortunately Naomi stopped short of suggesting that 911 was false flag terror, even if she explains the exploitation of false flags throughout history and the concept of creating terror myths. Maybe it was because of the editor of the Guardian, a left gate keeper instance so far.

Here's the most important issue:


Creating a terrifying threat - hydra-like, secretive, evil - is an old trick. It can, like Hitler's invocation of a communist threat to the nation's security, be based on actual events (one Wisconsin academic has faced calls for his dismissal because he noted, among other things, that the alleged communist arson, the Reichstag fire of February 1933, was swiftly followed in Nazi Germany by passage of the Enabling Act, which replaced constitutional law with an open-ended state of emergency). Or the terrifying threat can be based, like the National Socialist evocation of the "global conspiracy of world Jewry", on myth.

New Essay by Manuel Valenzuela- "The Great American Catalyzing Event"

At first you may think of the PNAC-agenda. But this is in fact a long essay about the birth of our movement.


The new Pearl Harbor was such a horrific event, of such profound importance and mind-changing dimensions for the American people, and its lies and deceptions so obvious and apparent, that its criminality has completely transformed the views and beliefs of millions of Americans.


Popular Mechanics Fact-Checks Rosie On WTC Conspiracy Theory

ETP Staff | Posted Monday April 2, 2007 at 10:59 AM

While the Trump Affair is (finally) a thing of the past, Rosie continues to flex her well-defined muscles for sparking controversy. Last week the outspoken View star claimed, in response to a question from co-host Elisabeth Hasselbeck about the validity of 9/11 conspiracy theories, that, while she didn't know what to believe about the U.S. government's involvement, she did believe that "it's the first time in history that fire has ever melted steel. I do believe that it defies physics that World Trade Center tower 7--building 7, which collapsed in on itself--it is impossible for a building to fall the way it fell without explosives being involved." Enter Popular Mechanics, which had previously compiled reports by physicists and demolition experts for its 2006 book "Debunking 9/11 Myths." The mag quickly fired back on its blog, refuting every one of her claims in detail. Highlights are as follows:



Follow up by the New York Post Page 6 gossip on Sheen- narration on Loose Change confirmed


March 24, 2007 -- CHARLIE Sheen has confirmed our exclusive story that he'll narrate a feature version of the stupid YouTube video "Loose Change," which claims that shadowy U.S. government operatives used explosives to bring down the World Trade Center. "It's a story that needs to be told. It's a story about the truth, and the truth needs to be exposed," the "Two and a Half Men" star told "Extra." "It's not just me, not just the Hollywood community [who] is standing up saying what you have given us doesn't make sense. We just want better answers." The video pushes the widely debunked "controlled demolition" theory which claims that the Twin Towers and 7 World Trade Center were blown up from within. It alleges the jet-fuel fires inside the towers weren't hot enough to melt the buildings' steel beams. The video, written and directed by Dylan Avery, has been scoffed at by the makers of an opposing video, "Screw Loose Change." Its claims were also soundly refuted by Popular Mechanics magazine, which shot down every single assertion made by the conspiracy theorists.

Found this nice picture over there at

Chapter 23 of the Veterans for Peace participating in the 4th Anniversar of the Invasion of Iraq march. SUV with 9/11 Truth messages heading down East St. in Rochester, NY on 18 March 2007.

Bigger picture:


It seems that is more open for 911 truth lately.

The latest from Kevin Barrett on KSM

This is the latest from Kevin Barrett:


Khalid Sheikh Mohammed Wants to Slay Us!

by Kevin "Irish Muslim" Barrett

(as-salaamu alaikum and a top o' the marnin' to ye on this fine St. Paddy's day)

The 9/11 Commission Report is not a Report at all, but a spy novel by a certain Dr. Philip Zelikow.* Zelikow, a self-proclaimed specialist in "the creation and maintenance of public myths," offers plenty of footnotes but very little evidence to support his official version of events.

If you track down Zelikow's footnotes, you'll see that virtually the entire official story about the alleged "Muslim extremist hijackers" is based on a single, highly unreliable source: Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM). Zelikow tells us that KSM was arrested in Pakistan in 2003, and his subsequent interrogation by US officials is the source of most of the "19 extremist hijackers" tale.

One little problem: There is no evidence that KSM was ever arrested, and lots of evidence that the whole story of his "arrest" was bogus.

As Paul Thompson points out in his Complete 9/11 Timeline:

March 10, 2003: Dubious Arrest Video Raises Question of KSM-ISI

Al Qaida- literally the database- The Brooklyn Connection

Ok, I've just put together some sources, as always. A lot of stuff, as always, too. Make up your mind and decide what this means!

Al-Qaida, literally the database...
...was maintained by Bin Laden's Maktab al Khidimat (MAK) recruiting organization, which ... maintained offices in Detroit and Brooklyn in the 1980s

Robin Cook

The Brooklyn connection

Brooklyn. The Brooklyn connection is a smoking gun, a direct trace to false flag operations!
Let’s start with this article to track the origins of the Brooklyn terror cell…

[From _The Village Voice_, March 30, 1993]


The Agency Coddled Omar Abdel Rahman, Allowing
Him to Operate in the U.S.
Now This Unholy Alliance Has Blown Up in Our Faces.

By Robert I. Friedman

"They were talking all the time about targeting American symbols," says the
FBI undercover informant, "the Empire State Building, the Statue of
Liberty. A few of the guys came to the mosque to pray and go home. But
others gathered to conspire in small groups, talking in deep, low voices.

Documentation on media coverage on WTC7

I search for the BBC coverage on WTC7 after it collapsed. I've just read something by 911veritas, but can't find it anymore. can someone help me out?

Their behaviour could be important for further investigations, as we have to know how they handled their early WTC collapse reporting "error".
As far as I know the immediately decided to made a cover-up.

In this matter it could be interesting to dig for the coverage of all news outlets regarding WTC7.

I suspect no one was live on, several broke their live feeds just minutes before the collapse, I need to know when were the first pictures of the smoldering debris shown, when the actually collapse?

Because of the strange behaviour of the BBC in special, but all media in general when it somes to WTC7 and the oblivion, I feel maybe we find out more interesting details.
It should be worth the time.

All BBC / WTC7 relevant news in one .pdf

I made this in just 5 hours!

I hope it will serve for our case. If you find errors, please report them to me, I'll correct them soon!

More thoughts about BBC / WTC7

I had a similar thread earlier this day:

Here are more points that came to my mind:

· 119.
· At 09:44 PM on 27 Feb 2007,
· Jason wrote:
I'm confused...what is the conspiracy? What are the implications of reporting WTC7 falling before it actually did? Who cares I was living in NYC at the time and it was widely reported that other building that were part of the WTC were collapsing or would collapse eventually. So they jumped the gun? What are the implications everyone is getting at here????

So, spot on.

I have heard several times now the spin that the BBC probably mixed up these other reports that “other buildings might collapse” with “Building 7 has collapsed”. Besides all doubts that the BBC could made such an unbelievable error and that other news-outlets were running similar news:

Putting the WTC7 in context

Now, with three confirmations about early (means before it actually happened) reports on the collapse of WTC7, we can assume that there was indeed an early press release, stating that Building 7 has collapsed due to fires and damage from the fallen debris of the Twin Towers.

The CNN guy was confused, as he could see the building still standing in the skyline, which made him switch to “Is collapsing” as he reads the news.
The BBC reporter, who did not necessarily knew the Manhattan skyline in detail, gave us the original report: “indeed it has collapsed.”

The people behind this press release should be taken unter close scrutinity, they are most likely the real perps of that day. We can only speculate, if it was the OEM or a similar organisation or group of persons.

I mean, this early reporting was not necessarily an “error” in the script Matrix.

Remember that WTC7 slided into oblivion after that day, from 01-09-12 on?

Sy Hersh on covert operations and funds not appropriated, mentioning 911 the same sentence

Hersh: There has been some violence. So America, my country, without telling Congress, using funds not appropriated, I don't know where, by my sources believe much of the money obviously came from Iraq where there is all kinds of piles of loose money, pools of cash that could be used for covert operations.

All of this should be investigated by Congress, by the way, and I trust it will be. In my talking to membership — members there, they are very upset that they know nothing about this. And they have great many suspicions.

We are simply in a situation where this president is really taking his notion of executive privilege to the absolute limit here, running covert operations, using money that was not authorized by Congress, supporting groups indirectly that are involved with the same people that did 9/11, and we should be arresting these people rather than looking the other way…