stallion4's blog

Don't contribute to 911Blogger until dz bans the disinformation spam artists who are making a mockery out of all 911 research

"Fool's gold exists because there is real gold." -13th century Persian poet Rumi
I'm requesting that everyone consider not contributing to this website until the site owner, dz, makes an effort to ban people who are spamming it relentlessly with theories about no planes, TV fakery, space beams, etc..

It's my opinion that has become a safe haven for such individuals, who are IMO purposely trying to destroy the credibility of all 9/11 research by promoting these controversial theories -- theories that the overwhelming majority of 9/11 researchers believe to be divisive, deceptive, destructive, etc..

I'm not advocating banning someone for occasionally presenting these theories, or other controversial theories, but we all know that it hasn't been an occasional occurrence here at Instead it seems to be an every minute of the day occurrence.

So, until dz takes the appropriate steps to get rid of the spammers, please contribute elsewhere.

I want to make it clear that I'm not speaking for anyone but myself. However, I do encourage those who agree with what I've written in this blog to not contribute to this website in any way until dz improves the situation. If he decides not to, I respect that -- however, I request my membership at be terminated if he chooses not to.

False Flag News Reminder

D. L. Abrahamson
Host: D. L. Abrahamson

Just a reminder to listeners that False Flag News now airs at 9 p.m to 10 p.m. (EST M-F). DL will probably have a lot to say about the plane hitting the highrise in NYC today.

Call in to have your say:

(800) 313-9443

9 p.m. to 10 p.m. EST

Listen live:

Archive will be posted here:

Here's D. L. Abrahamson's website:

9/11 Footage Captures Audio Evidence of Explosions Seconds BEFORE North Tower Falls Down

By Stallion4
October 8, 2006

Thunderous "booms" can be heard coming from the North Tower seconds before it falls down in this recently discovered 9/11 interview with BBC correspondent Stephen Evans:

YouTube Video Link
Video Download

(I recommend wearing headphones while watching and listening to this video clip. If you do not have headphones, try turning up the volume on your computer speakers to pick up the sound of explosions and the reactions from bystanders)

While the "booms" are occurring, bystanders begin pointing and looking in the direction of the North Tower. One bystander can be heard saying "Oh my God!". A few seconds after that another explosion can be heard, and the person being interviewed, Stephen Evans, covers his ears in a fright and turns around to see the North Tower begin to fall. (Continued...)

VIDEO: James Fetzer and Kevin Barrett @ UW in Madison WI. Oct 1st


posted by woken sheep
Thursday, October 05, 2006
James Fetzer and Kevin Barrett @ UW in Madison

Well IM back after my 8 hours of driving from Madison. It was a good day beautiful day to be exact. Fetzer and Barrett put on a great presentation for the people of Wisconsin. They were handing out terror storm DVD's, deception dollars and media about 911 veterans for truth. 911 vets paid for the whole thing BTW. Including the check donated by fetzer.
I captured the video and audio from an analog video camera so theirs a bit of a hiss in the audio, and I forgot my tripod but the video is still pretty steady. Its all there anyway. I hope you guys enjoy this as it was a pain in the ass holding that camera up for as long as I did.
after it was all said and done some reporter told me "I should sell the tape" I said "nah it'll be on the net for free tomorrow" she then asked me where and I told her " and". She wrote down the url's and thanked me for the links and I took off for another wonderful 4 hour ride home.

Click here for video.

(Also check out Reprehensor's blog "More press coverage of UW 9/11 lecture!" and "Victory for Kevin Barrett!" for more information regarding this story)

VIDEO: William Kristol Confrontation

"We know that y'all did it!"

Aaron Dykes & Kevin Smith/ | October 5, 2006

William Kristol, chairman of the Project for a New American Century (founded in 1997) spoke at the University of Texas in Austin about the current political climate and the "new order" or "new world" that emerged after 9/11. He was confronted by a large number of protesters who carry banners and question his role in 9/11. The event was covered by the Daily Texan.


Extended version of interview w/ Controlled Demo Expert Danny Jowenko confirming that Building 7 was brought down on purpose

A person who goes by the name of "einsteen" over on Loose Change's message boards has translated and posted a much more detailed and extended version of a recent interview conducted with Controlled Demolition Expert Danny Jowenko, in which he confirms that Building 7 was indeed brought down via controlled demolition.

Excerpts from this unedited raw footage first appeared on a Dutch television news program called, Zembla investigates 9/11 theories (2006).

PART 1 of 3

PART 2 of 3

War Price on U.S. Lives Equal to 9/11

Sep 22, 7:29 PM EDT

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Now the death toll is 9/11 times two. U.S. military deaths from Iraq and Afghanistan now match those of the most devastating terrorist attack in America's history, the trigger for what came next. Add casualties from chasing terrorists elsewhere in the world, and the total has passed the Sept. 11 figure.

The latest milestone for a country at war comes without commemoration. It also may well come without the precision of knowing who is the 2,973rd man or woman of arms to die in conflict in Iraq and Afghanistan, or just when it happens. The terrorist attacks killed 2,973 victims in New York, Washington and Pennsylvania.


Thousands Of Victims' Family Members Believe 9/11 Was An Inside Job

Alex Jones interviews 9/11 victim's father Bill Doyle who lost his son Joseph Doyle during the September 11th attack...

Original airdate: July 7, 2006

Alex Jones: Founded in September of 2001, the World Trade Center United Family Group is a nonprofit 501c3, and you were its founder and head and you say you represent over 7,000 people. What is the average view of those that you represent about 9/11 and the cover-up?

Bill Doyle: What they want is... If you want to believe the 9/11 Commission's story -- like a lot of us don't, ok? You really gotta go look in the... It almost looks like there was a conspiracy about 9/11 -- if you really look at all the facts. A lot of families now feel the same way.


Alex Jones: With your 7,000 members, I'm sure you've talked to most if not all of them. What percentage would you say believe 9/11 is an inside job to some extent?

Bill Doyle: Maybe half... Probably 50/50.

Full interview here:

Structural Experts think Building 7 was a "Controlled Demolition"

In case you missed it, Gangster blogged this story a few days ago and I'm blogging about it again today, because I don't think it's garnered the attention it deserves. We now have structural experts on public record saying that "WTC-7 was with the utmost probability brought down by controlled demolition done by experts."

Here's the link to Gangster's original blog for more information about this story:

(Attention 911blogger staff:

Originally when I created this blog, I requested that the story be posted on the front page. And a short time later I saw that it had been. SO I then removed my request (since it had been added to the front page), but for some reason after editing my blog, it caused the story to disappear from the front page. SO I'm guessing that if someone edits their blog after it's been posted on the front page, it will automatically return back to "Blog" status and not news?

Anyway, thanks for trying. If y'all try again, please remove my comments about this, because they don't relate to the story)

Demo Expert Confirms WTC-7 Was "Controlled Demolition"

Controlled Demolitions Expert Danny Jowenko:

" starts from below... They have simply blown away columns."

"This is controlled demolition."

"A team of experts did this."

"This is professional work, without any doubt."

For video, click below:

The vido clip above is an excerpt from a Dutch television program called, Zembla investigates 9/11 theories. It can be watched in its entirety at this link:

Here's some background information about Danny Jowenko's statments in Zembla investigates 9/11 theories:

Posted by dz on (9/12/06) under "Grab Bag of News Submissions":
One of the more interesting moments in this documentary (about 46:25 minutes into it) is when they ask demolition expert Danny Jowenko (who has his own demolition firm and reportedly has been active in this business for 27 years) to comment on videos of the collapse of the Twin Towers and WTC 7.His response to the WTC 7 video: "This is controlled demolition".

Israel's "Clean Break" + PNAC's "Rebuilding America's Defenses" = 9/11?

I'm sure most here are familiar with PNAC's "Rebuilding America's Defenses (RAD)" paper, which states "...the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event — like a new Pearl Harbor." However, we never hear much about an Israeli policy paper that preceded PNAC's RAD plan by four years entitled "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm".

The excerpt from the article below explains how Israel's "Clean Break" policy paper and PNAC's "RAD" plan are intimately related:



The $64,000.00 question of “Who done it?“ is found in the brainchild of Richard Perle and Benjamin Netanyahu…”A Clean Break”, the founding document of PNAC.

A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm

Commonly referred to as the "Clean Break" report, was prepared in 1996 by a study group led by Richard Perle. The other participants were James Colbert, Charles Fairbanks, Jr, Douglas Feith, Robert Loewenberg, Jonathan Torop, David Wurmser and Meyrav Wurmser

Tune in to the Friday Night Block Party on REVERE RADIO NETWORK

If you're looking for something to do tonight, tune in to the Friday Night Block Party on the Revere Radio Network. Robb Revere is on live right now (11pm EST)


More info:

AUDIO: Phone call to Popular Mechanics' Davin Coburn re: Charles Goyette Show

For those who aren't familiar with Arizona radio talk show host Charles Goyette's recent interview with Popular Mechanics' Davin Coburn, have a listen to it before listening to the follow up phone call made to Mr. Coburn by "Jeff" from .

Charles Goyette Interview:
9/11 Debunking the Debunkers —"The Charles Goyette Show", interview with Popular mechanics' Davin Coburn Wed Aug 23, 2006

The Goyette Interview is also available on 911podcasts. calls Davin Coburn of Popular Mechanics (Aug 29, 2006)
MP3 Download


3 Minute audio clip of Davin Coburn saying "'Pull It' is not a controlled demolition term" on the Charles Goyette Show. Included at the end of the audio clip is's phone call to Controlled Demolitions Inc. asking them "what does 'pull it' mean?"
MP3 Download

More calls at

Jim Hoffman shreds NIST's latest release

NIST's World Trade Center FAQ
A Reply to the National Institute for Standards and Technology's
Answers to Frequently Asked Questions
by Jim Hoffman


On August 30, 2006, the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) posted on their website a list of fourteen frequently asked questions (FAQ) and answers to them. NIST should be commended for at least addressing a number of the serious questions that have been raised with regard to its investigation. However, NIST's new FAQ avoids answering the central charges of its most visible critique, Building a Better Mirage.

* That NIST fails to support it's key assertion that "collapse initiation" automatically leads to "global collapse".

* That NIST uses the diversionary tactic of describing some events -- such as the airliner crashes -- in great detail, while almost completely avoiding the core question of what brought the Towers down.

* That NIST's report is internally inconsistent, supposing that steel columns were heated to temperatures hundreds of degrees in excess of the maximum temperatures indicated by its steel samples.

* That NIST fails to substantiate it's implied claim that its computer models predicted "collapse initiation".

* That NIST fails to even address most of the features of the Towers' destruction that are apparently unique to controlled demolitions.


Continued at link.