The ICONOCLAST's blog

What is the status of the "smoking gun" evidence?

Several months have passed since Prof. Jones revealed his startling evidence that supposedly proves some sort of explosives/incendiaries were used in the demolition of the WTC 1,2 and 7. When I first viewed his presentation I was floored because this was the physical evidence we needed. Since then however I have heard little about it. Does anybody know what the status is with that? And what can we do to help speed up the process of getting this information out there and peer-reviewed? any ideas? Take care everyone, keep fighting the good fight

"The educated differ from the uneducated as much as the living from the dead" - Aristotle

"But WTC 7 had structural damage, that is why it collapsed!"

Is anybody else getting sick of the, "WTC 7 had structural damage" argument. Look at these two pictures. One is of the Federal building in OKC, it is almost half-way gone and yet it did not collapse. The Damage to WTC 7 does not even come close, yet it fell onto itself in 6.5 seconds. So how did WTC 7 fall? Structural damage...? I don't think so.

http://www.truthdig.com/images/reportuploads/oklahomacity_350.jpg

Absolutely demolished, yet still standing

http://judi.kw.nl/uploads/fok/wtc7-sw-corner1.jpg

Not even a significant percentage of the building is demolished, and as anyone with a 5th grade education knows if this building collasped due to this structural damage than it should have fallen towards the wound, not straight down in 6.5 seconds.

"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."

-John F. Kennedy