em7's blog

Building resting on its core

I just came across this:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/chriszanf/sets/72157600345139512/
(taken in London. These are not my own pics)
I thought its quite interesting to see a building resting entirely on its core.
Could be useful as another thing to illustrate the crazyness of the 'fire-induced -collapse' theory, maybe.

ZERO Investigation on 911 : New (italian made) docu

Not sure if this got reported here already :

http://www.zeroinvestigation911.com

a documentary film by Giulietto Chiesa (Member of the European Parliament) and Franco Fracassi

Ive not seen the film yet, but it looks/sounds promising...
Looks like good people are involved in this!!:
http://www.zeroinvestigation911.com/IlFilm/LeFonti/tabid/63/en-US/Default.aspx

ETH Zürich project: Failure consequences and reliability acceptance criteria for exceptional building structures

i came across this recently:
https://www.rdb.ethz.ch/projects/project.php?proj_id=12165&type=search&z...

This is an ongoing project at the tech university ETH in Zürich, Switzerland.
Thats the uni where Bachman and Schneider have been teaching . ( http://www.911blogger.com/node/2925 )
(Those two are not involved in this project though)

Short Summary:
The project analyses the consequences associated to the World Trade Centre collapse. The assessment of socio-economic consequences considers consequences due to fatalities next to businesses and material losses. Based on these findings optimal safety levels will be derived for such structures.

I emailed them a few weeks ago, asking if they have been considering the controlled demolition theory too, specially in the case of WTC7,
as this would obviously make quite a bit of a difference concerning "failure consequences / reliability.." of building structures.
I received no reply so far :(

911 Computer Game

Im not thinking of a stupid 'fly planes into building' game or such, but, something that doesnt offend the witnesses (i dont care if it offends Bill O'lie'lly)
The player is in control of the NORAD maybe, or somethin alike.
Or, multiplayer modus: everyone chooses his character. You know em, Atta, Cheney, BinL.,etc etc
All known facts should be 'integrated' into the game. Within those, players are allowed to make 'moves'.
Just an idea.

What is it that went wrong?

I have a feeling something went quite wrong on that day, ie not according to plan.
I dont mean Shanksville and all that, but WTC7.
I mean, it cant have been part of a master plan to bring it down as obvious as it was done, i think.
So, what should have happend? Another plane? Hm, i dont think so. What else ?
Im sure people here have a few ideas to offer.

119 questions

Ok, this is very old , but i still thought its worth this blog.

http://www.119-questions.com

Its a very interesting concept, i think. Quite a good 'introduction' into the whole case for people who are 'afraid of conspiracy theories'.
You know, those people actually intelligent, but sort of reluctant to look into it, cause its all just 'crazy conspiracy theories'.
Lets people think for themselves, and doesnt offer any wild theories.
A good example of how there is actually *no* speculation needed to educate people.

Its a coverup, not a conspiracy theory.

2.3 trillion dollars

As Rumsfeld announced on 10-11-2001.Transactions worth 2.3 trillion dollars were 'lost'.
Why isnt this a bigger topic?
I hardly hear anyone talk about this, except for Jim Fetzer , recently in that Fox interview.
What was that again, the people who died at the pentagon were 90% accountants?
2.3 trillion, thats a 'pile' of 100us$ notes from berlin to madrid. 2'300 kilometers of freaking 100$ notes.

42% vs 43% Math

Ok, so the polls show that 43% have never heard of WTC7.
And, 42% doubt the official story.
How many of those 42% who doubt know about WTC7?
My guess would be , hm, lets say, 95%. (Are there official figures on that?)
Ok, so , hey, theres not many left who heard of WTC7, and do not doubt.
Simple, i know. But simple things are important.

Christian C. Walther: 'Der Zensierte Tag'

For the german speakers around here , i highly recommend this book. It came out ~2 years ago, but is certainly still 'valid'.
It deals alot with the media and its 'handling' of 911.
I would say this is probably one of the most underrated books in the history of german literature. Seriously.
This might become a famous classic, many many years from now...in a optimistic view that is.
Anyone read it?

Whats the best way to deal with the holocaust-denier-comparison

I get to hear this more and more. This drives me insane. Thinking about this has the potential to ruin my whole day. Nothing since a long time has made me
feel as violent as this does. Should i just ignore it? But how can I ? Man, this is the most-evil argument agains the truth ever. I have to learn to deal with this
without killing people.
Any help is appreciated. Thanks.

Swiss 'Blick' newspaper about 9/11

Ola everyone,
Switzerlands second biggest newspaper 'Blick' had a title-page and 2 page report about 9/11 today.
This paper is not exactly the most 'serious' one here, but rather boulevard-y.
But all in all, the report is fair.
The first parapgraph is online at http://www.blick.ch/news/ausland/9-11/artikel45057

The title-page header is : "Is the Bush Clan behind it?"
"Now also swiss scientists say: The more we research, the more we doubt' "

Prof. Albert Stähelin (military-strategy-expert), and Dr. Daniele Ganser (you might have heard of him, he's associated with st911 i think)
are both expressing their serious doubts about the official story. It lists '5 hot questions' , including wtc7, pentagon, insider trading, able danger,
twin tower collapse) and lists the official explanation, for those points where there actually exists one that is. However, it fails to point out what exactly the problems
are with those explanations.

Anyway, my first blog entry here. Hi all! Glad to be here, not so glad about why im here.
Regards
em7