There are significant indications that the U.S. may be attacked again this Sunday, Oct. 22. This letter is written from the understanding that certain people in control of our government were either complicit or responsible for the attacks of 9/11. Those attacks took a lot of us by surprise. Hopefully we can learn from the past to see it coming next time. This may be upon us now.

Here is the situation:
The administration wants to attack an oil rich country, but doesn't have the public's support to do so. Last time that country was Iraq. This time that country is Iran.
The administration's intention to attack both Iraq and Iran is already published in the "New American Century" document.
The Iranians have announced plans to switch to Euros to sell their oil instead of U.S. Dollars, just as Saddam Hussein had before the U.S. attacked Iraq.
There is an election coming up next month which now threatens to unseat the Republican majority in Congress.
Alex Jones, who is one of the founding members of this country's 9/11 Truth Movement, has stated that his research indicates that this month, Oct. 2006, is the month there is likely to be another attack against the U.S. from the same inside group that pulled off the 9/11 attacks.

Even though the government itself has rejected 9/11 Commission’s the so called “pancake theory” of how the Twin Towers fell, there are still a lot of Truth activists who are wasting their time discrediting that old theory. As an added benefit, the government has replaced the old Pancake Theory with a new one that is even easier to discredit. It’s so new that I don’t think it even has a name yet. So I’m taking this opportunity to dub this new theory “The Pull Down Theory”.

Check out the government's National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) website: http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm where it says: “NIST’s findings do not support the “pancake theory” of collapse which is premised on a progressive failure of the floor systems in the WTC towers (the composite floor system - that connected the core columns and the perimeter columns - consisted of a grid of steel 'trusses' integrated with a concrete slab). Instead, the NIST investigation showed conclusively that the failure of the inwardly bowed perimeter columns initiated collapse and that the occurrence of this inward bowing required the sagging floors to remain connected to the columns and pull the columns inwards. Thus, the floors did not fail progressively to cause a pancaking phenomenon.”