NJcpaTOM's blog

Aljazeera - English - Submission to "Your Views"

The Aljazeera English website located at the following
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/55ABE840-AC30-41D2-BDC9-06BBE2A36665.htm
has a feature called "Your Views" http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/B84B85E3-7E69-4D79-8121-746EBEA7B304.htm

I have taken advantage of this access to millions of other citizens of the world and submitted something similar to the following. The reason I said similar was because the "Your Views" section limits the comments to 1000 characters an frequently erases the pages each time the website is updated. Similar to the way NFL.com updates the scores and play by play. So when I copied the original I noticed some obviouse typos and have corrected them here. The last I heard from the website was when I submitted the original and received a message the it would be reviewed and might be posted.

"Thank you for giving me the opportunity to reach out to the citizens of the world and ask their assistance to bring to justice the people responsible for the 11 September, 2001 attacks.
I would like to inform you that the Security Council of the United Nations adopted Resolution 1368 on 12 September, 2001. Part of the Resolution "calls on all States to work together urgently to bring to justice the perpetrators, organizers and sponsors.."

Insurance Claims - World Trade Center

It is my understanding that most, if not all, of the insurance claims filed for the 9/11 events in NYC are based on the original theory that terrorists hijacked commercial passenger planes. These commercial passenger planes crashed into the 110 story towers and that each tower collapsed as a result of the fires that were created by jet fuel.

The 9/11 Official Commission had not even been appointed before those claims were filed. Is it really any wonder why the Commission came to the conclusion that it did? I believe that the Official Commission was told to come to conclusions which would support the insurance claims that had already been filed if not partially paid by then. The FEMA & recently released NIST reports were designed to support the Official Commission Report.

I have not heard that any one of the more than 20 insurance companies that are involved ever asked for an investigation.

I have not heard anything that any of the owners of the publicly traded stock have asked the Board of Directors of those companies why they did not ask for an investigation or why the company has not considered the claims invalid. I believe that people who own stock in any of the insurance companies can start to pressure management of the insurance companies because the claims are being paid from the earnings owned by the stockholders.

Beware of disinformation in 911 "Truth" forums

A funny thing happened to me in my quest to seek the 9/11 Truth. I didn't start to look into the events of 9/11 until the lengthy litigation with a large national bank was settled in the fall of 2005.
Since I had extra time on my hands someone suggested that I watch "911: In Plane Site", so I did. One question led to another question, you know how it goes. I bought numerous DVD's that dealt with the subject and then went to find a website to learn more and to share what I had learned from others.
I thought I had found a home in 911 Pilots For Truth. I was very active asking questions and posting replys and sharing my information.
I am a firm believer that all 4 of the original "Flights" are still missing. I have listed some of the reasons below:
1 - There was no passenger aircraft wreckage nor passenger bodies recovered from Flight 77at the Pentagon and the damage to the building itself is not sufficient to uphold the theory that appears in the Official Story.
2 - The lack of wreckage of a passenger aircraft at the "crash site" in Shanksville PA.
3 - The obvious differences in appearance between the Flight 175 that took off and the POD oand other appearance differences of the "Flight 175" that crashed into the tower and the "flash" just prior to impact.