Blogs

Hit Piece: "The Conspiracy of the 9/11." But Czechs Fight Back.

Mf Dnes hit piece. "Circus CIA" screenshot

A hit piece article, not far fetched to be described as mostly based on pure demagogic overtures appeared in one of the most distributed Czech daily newspapers, the Mf Dnes, which is seen by many as rather renowned outlet for its regular unbalanced and slanderous political "journalism".

But firstly, to tackle another recent controversy, the Mf Dnes editorials called for unquestionable and unconditional support for accommodating a proposed US military missile/radar base which should be part of the controversial anti-ballistic missile system deployed within the Central European region and outside the NATO/EU security structures. Despite the, fact that the first '06 summer poll showed 83% opposition across the party line of the general Czech public to such a proposal.

Grassroots rallies "Ne zakladnam! No to bases!" and antiwar initiatives have mobilized against both the large part of the corporate as well as the public broadcasting media, which were firstly reluctant to cover the issue before the summer parliamentary elections at all. Large chunk of the media later jumping on the unpopular pro base rightwing government bandwagon.

Although, the author of the main conspiracy article and additional "expert" interview did plug the recent Scripps – University of Ohio poll and also mockingly mentioned in passing the science community on the issue (not mentioning specifically 9/11 Scholars for Truth or any individuals) the articles were conducted in bluntly uninformed, and dishonest distractive manner, not unlike the infamous Ann Coulter style.

(more after the jump..)

9/11 Toxic Dust Whistleblower Raided by SWAT Team

http://www.prisonplanet.com/images/september2006/150906swat.jpg

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/september2006/150906whistleblowerraided.htm

 

9/11 Toxic Dust Whistleblower Raided By SWAT Team
Ground zero hero Major Mike McCormack says he was deliberately targeted for helping release documents on EPA government cover-up, says 75% of police, firemen believe 9/11 cover-up

Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | September 15 2006

A 9/11 toxic dust whistleblower, a ground zero hero and one of the individuals influential in the release of documents proving a government cover-up that deliberately put police, firemen and rescue personel at risk, has been raided by a New York SWAT team - who ransacked his home for three hours after he was arrested.

Swiss 'Blick' newspaper about 9/11

Ola everyone,
Switzerlands second biggest newspaper 'Blick' had a title-page and 2 page report about 9/11 today.
This paper is not exactly the most 'serious' one here, but rather boulevard-y.
But all in all, the report is fair.
The first parapgraph is online at http://www.blick.ch/news/ausland/9-11/artikel45057

The title-page header is : "Is the Bush Clan behind it?"
"Now also swiss scientists say: The more we research, the more we doubt' "

Prof. Albert Stähelin (military-strategy-expert), and Dr. Daniele Ganser (you might have heard of him, he's associated with st911 i think)
are both expressing their serious doubts about the official story. It lists '5 hot questions' , including wtc7, pentagon, insider trading, able danger,
twin tower collapse) and lists the official explanation, for those points where there actually exists one that is. However, it fails to point out what exactly the problems
are with those explanations.

Anyway, my first blog entry here. Hi all! Glad to be here, not so glad about why im here.
Regards
em7

Foundation funding and the left media gatekeepers

http://www.leftgatekeepers.com/

Understand the leftist gatekeepers and their reluctance to deviate from the official 9/11 fable.

CHOMSKY FEARS 9/11 DEBATE

News :: International

CHOMSKY FEARS 9/11 DEBATE

http://boston.indymedia.org/newswire/display_any/187304

by Fool me once...

(No verified email address) 14 Sep 2006

When questioned about his stance on the 9/11 issue, Chomsky timidly regurgitates the official line by saying that the version we are force-fed by the mainstream media is "pretty much what happened. He claims that he hasn't seen any "credible evidence" to suggest otherwise.
It's all fine and good that Mr. Chomsky confronts Israel for its phony justification for mass murder in Lebanon [ http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/09/345826.shtml ]-- an obvious attempt by him to regain the trust of the anti-war movement, which is finally embracing the 9/11 Truth movement -- but let us *NEVER FORGET* where he stands on the most important issue of our time: the state-terror apparatus that is plunging the world into a totalitarian fascist nightmare.

When questioned on Dr. Hesham Tillawi's online video program about his stance on the 9/11 issue, Chomsky timidly regurgitates the official line by saying that the version we are force-fed by the mainstream media is "pretty much what happened", with 19 Arab hijackers responsible for the planning and execution of the attacks. He claims that he hasn't seen any "credible evidence" to suggest otherwise.

Paul Craig Roberts: "Where is the evidence?"

http://informationclearinghouse.info/article14963.htm 

Just saw this and thought I post my thoughts. He makes some excellent points that I think many here will resonate with. In particular, I liked the following (emphasis mine):

My opinion of “Loose Change” and Popular Mechanics is independent of who won the debate [on Democracy Now!]. The “Loose Change” producers are more to be admired than the Popular Mechanics editors for the simple reason that the former are committed to opening a debate and the latter are committed to closing debate down. Indeed, Popular Mechanics was early on the scene trying to close off debate by defending the government line. Why?

If I had been in the debate, I would have asked Meigs and Dunbar what’s conspiratorial about a thorough hearing and examination of an event that has been used to justify illegal invasions that are war crimes and have destroyed two countries and killed tens of thousands of people.

And this:

Handschuh Photo -- simultaneous explosions IN OTHER TOWER

Re: Impact Holes ... WTC TOWER aeroplane silhouttes ...

DO YOU SEE THE WHITE EXPLOSION CLOUD IN THE LEFT TOWER?

Please leave comments and tell me what your observations / conclusions are.

To me nothing of the visual evidence really makes sense. See PlaneImpact and Damage. I suggest that China or Russia (or Iran, or France) recreates 20 floors worth of World Trade Center, and then flies a 767 into it... Only then we will know what the effect looks like. My guess is that it looks VERY different.


My favourite photo still is the one that you see on the left, it's history is told here:

http://www.google.com/search?q=handschuh+photo+wtc

Another version:

http://wtc10048nyc.free.fr/120.html

Apart from the MISSING PLANE DEBRIS and the weird explosion it shows the simultaneous explosions IN THE OTHER TOWER (north tower).

OUTREACH

Today will my third day this week going out with all the materials and bullhorn and telling truth in public. I'm amped up and so into this and the response so far has been awesome, including 100% support from police officers, amazingly enough. I'm gonna go into work and make a ton of flyers. It was going to be just me and one friend again but now other people are saying they're going to be there too.

 

 

Another CIA veteran

Stop Belittling the Theories About September 11
by Bill Christison
www.dissidentvoice.org
August 14, 2006

However horrendous the crimes of two of the world¹s great liars and
terrorists in Gaza and Lebanon, it is imperative that we not let the deeds
of Ehud Olmert and George W. Bush distract us from another recent event.

The U.S. alliance with Israel and the power of the lobby that lets Israel so
easily influence U.S. foreign policy have been major factors in allowing the
monstrous slaughter of innocent civilians in Gaza and Lebanon. What is
happening in these lands may also encourage Olmert and Bush to start new
hostilities in Syria and heavy, possibly nuclear, bombings in Iran -- and
this entire mess of neocon pottage may lead to a new World War and clashes
of civilizations and religious fundamentalisms that these two wretched
politicians seem quite literally to want to impose on the rest of us. It¹s a
tough case to make that anything else going on in the world -- anywhere --
could possibly be of equal importance.

But on July 29 and 30, and then again on August 1, something else happened
that increasing numbers of people believe is of equal importance. On these

I DESPISE The Term "Homeland."

I know I have a lot of company here as far as detesting the word "homeland". This nazi-like, fascist sounding, anti-American term has been forced on American citizens post 911. Only the liars-in-charge, the MSM and the clueless among the citizenry will spew this filth. True patriots will not utter this vile propogandist profanity, as it sickens them with it's true connotations.

I look forward to the day when America regains it's sanity, and throws this despicable term into the dustbin of history. The sooner 911 truth is revealed, the sooner this day will come.

Petition for Dr. Jones

I'm promoting a petition supporting Dr. Steven Jones of BYU. Please sign it and spread it far and wide. Thanks!
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/525834923

So what did the Neocons say about Iran?

IAEA: U.S. report on Iran 'dishonest'
AP - 1 hour, 39 minutes ago

VIENNA, Austria - A recent House of Representatives committee report on Iran's nuclear capability is "outrageous and dishonest" in trying to make a case that Tehran's program is geared toward making weapons, a senior official of the U.N. nuclear watchdog has said. The letter, obtained by The Associated Press on Thursday outside a 35-nation board meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency, says the report is false in saying Iran is making weapons-grade uranium at an experimental enrichment site, when it has in fact produced material only in small quantities that is far below the level that can be used in nuclear arms.

The fact that this report would suggest the Neocons were fear mongering to start war with Iran, shows they do lie to us. Now who is going to push the issue, or put the president on the spot? And anything they say about Iraq is equal to the same scrutiny since the IAEA also believed the uranium "letter" about Hussein going down to Nigeria to try and obtain yellowcake uranium, was a forgery. Which is the same letter that Joe Wilson also believed to be false, and found out for himself it w

What happened to the Pentagon videos?

So many people here on 911Blogger were worried that we were being set up for a smoking gun video that would PROVE once and for all that it was Flight 77 that actually hit the Pentagon. OK, it has been 4 months since Judicial Watch posted its ridiculous video obtained by a FOIA request. September 11 anniversary has passed. Nobody is talking about it any more. Too many other "fires" to put out I suppose.

So, what's the consensus of opinion now that all this time has passed? Have any of you changed your minds? I never bought into the idea that this was a set up, simply because the government has had so many years to produce a believable tape and all they could come up with is that lame "video" that so many talking heads said would put an end to the conspiracy theories. Seemed ridiculous then, and seems even more ridiculous now.

I still think that Flight 77 did not hit the Pentagon, and I still think the government is looking really bad on this one. I'd be very surprised if any other tapes are ever made public -- tapes that really show what happened. Of course, with a new investigation and subpoena power, perhaps we could actually see whatever it was that hit the Pentagon.

Metal of Honor, The Ironworkers of 9/11 - Documentary

I saw and recorded on VHS the above documentary on Spike TV last week (Septenber 6th).

It was freely narrated by the ironworkers themselves interspersed with captions or subtitles.

I don't have the ability to convert it to digital and to upload it, and have been unable to find it on Google Video or You Tube.

Today I watched it again and transcribed some of the comments of the ironworkers:

(Note, they did not have the names of the individuals on the screen as they were speaking. some of the comments refer to what they heard and saw prior to the collapse, and the rest to what they encountered at the scene when they arrived to help rescue potential survivors)

QUOTES:

Ironworker who had been been close to the scene before the collapse:
"My partner kept telling me the building is coming down. I'm saying "No Way! No Way!" And the the next thing you know, you heard this noise, I will never forget. It was like creeking, and the next thing you felt the ground rumbling."

Ironworker who attended the '93 attack on the towers:
"I didn't think they were gonna fall. After being there in '93 and seeing the damage that was done, at the bottom of those columns (pause) that was some blast! And I didn't think so at all."

What about NESARA? Can this have some truthfull background!

This might have some more answers to the real deal regarding September 11th 2001.
I came across this topic some time ago. Although it may be very controversial I think it is worth a look.
What do you think?

peace.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NESARA_conspiracy_theory