Blogs

Egos

There are several people within the movement who have TREMENDOUS egos. I have even referred to myself as an "Evil Genius". However, I am a VERY sarcastic individual, and OFTEN take part in jokes at my expense.

The reason I'm writing this is to remind everyone with egos of the following:

No ONE person has made a difference. It has been a COLLABORATIVE effort by people all over the world.

People like Dr. David Ray Griffin, Michael Ruppert, Paul Thompson, Dylan Avery, Carol Brouillet, etc... are all heroes. Each and every one of them.

However, how many people would have heard of their books, and videos, etc... if not for the 9/11 Truth Movement? How many mainstream media outlets have you seen post stories about their books? How many local stations have you seen post stories about their books? Think about how often in your daily life you see mention of anything related to 9/11 Truth. I can tell you it's not very much.

So my sincerest thanks to everyone in the movement. If not for us, the truth would have died.

Those of you with egos, please try to remember that.

9/11 Bloglines (08/27)

9/11 Bloglines (08/27)
http://www.bloglines.com/blog/ewing2001

Professor William Woodward's 9/11 theories outrage NH leaders (NH Union Leader)
Powerhouse Collection of 9-11 Controlled Demolition Quotes
OwntheNWO at 911blogger rants at '911hoax' posting: TV networks aired fake video of animated, CGI planes
At 911blogger: Suspicions about Prof. Jones grow...
TerrorStorm Texas Premiere a Huge Success!
Updates on LC broadcasts on Dutch TV
Delver's blog claims: "9/11 Eyewitness" is disinfo
FMNN: Moseley retracts...
Junk scientist Mark Bilk rants back again...
LC possibly premieres on History Channel Australia
Wood/Zebuhr: Strange Coincidence

[dz: updated to remove mischaracterization of OwntheNWO's statements as was changed in the original source for this post]

god whoever this is over at the history channel forum is killing us with garbage like this

http://boards.historychannel.com/thread.jspa?threadID=800013594&tstart=0&mod=1156549162488

I want to slap this F*cking idiot

" no planes struck the WTC
Posted: Aug 24, 2006 7:11 AM (1 of 11)

* Click to reply to this Reply to Topic
* Report

Around mid-2002 the case for controlled demolition of the WTC was essentially proven in the minds of many in the 911 truth movement. It was about this time that a small group of researchers discovered an even more remarkable facet of 9/11. Specifically, the shocking realization that the TV networks aired fake video of animated, CGI planes striking the WTC.

I was the first person to declare that the TV networks aired fake video. Since those early days many people have joined in support of this conclusion. At the moment, the question of whether real Boeing 767s struck the WTC is the hottest topic in the 911 Truth Movement. This is the area of research that is most promising for reaching the general public.

Globe and Mail "reviews" Towers of Deception

Martin Levin, writing in the Books section of the Globe and Mail yesterday (page D13), trashes Towers of Deception and says some of the "more important" books on 9/11 will be "reviewed at length" in coming weeks.

Levin misrepresents Zwicker's argument, claiming, for example, that Zwicker says Noam Chomsky "is part of the plot," without explaining what he means by that. Levin writes:

"Now I have little trouble believing it possible that plutocrats of the Bush-Cheney-Rumsfeld axis of ego are orchestrating things for their own benefit and that of their Fortune 500 cronies. Or that the war in Iraq is based on an unsavoury stew of misconceptions, stupidity, wishful thinking and deceit. But what I do have difficulty believing is that the 'perpetrators' are intelligent enough and, I suppose, quite evil enough, not only to concoct such a grand strategy, but to carry it off so deviously that only Zwicker and his allies can discern its true nature. I have just as hard a time believing that this sometimes entertainingly obsessive screed has proved anything at all."

"Only Zwicker and his allies"? You mean the 100 million Americans, 20 million Canadians, and countless millions of foreigners who believe the US government did it?

Antigovernment protesters seize 12 private radio stations

Protesters including striking school teachers in southern Mexico seized 12 private radio stations today after unidentified assailants shot up a government-owned station already under the demonstrators’ control.

http://www.cpj.org/news/2006/americas/mexico21aug06na.html

Why aren't we organizing this kind of action in the US? ... And I'm really talking about our public radio stations, but the Mexicans took over both Public and Private stations. Damn!

I tried to organize citizens in my hometown to protest the 'public' National Propaganda Radio station run by agents and/or useful idiots- but the anti-war 'leaders' (who have been in this small town for years longer than me, and they know everyone) who "know about 9/11" - yet all they want to do is organize a useless Saturday afternoon march!

When I brought up the importance of the radio and reaching more people than the 50 at the march... they told me: "never going to happen." And the rest of the crowd was all too happy to follow the leaders... the republicans aren't the only sheep in America.

How about 911bloggers? How about us? Do we have it in us to take the message to the next level, by marching on and possibly taking over tv and radio stations? If nothing else, we'd be informing/shaming the tv news crew, etc.

New WTC 7 Photos?

Perhaps this was posted before, but here are some previously unseen photos of WTC 7 and surrounding area during the fires.
They don't show anything new about WTC 7 itself, but it does reveal more about how extensive the fires and damage were to some surrounding buildings, which did NOT collpase. There are also a couple of "no-planer" debunking photos:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/august2006/230806wtccomplex.htm
There is a link on the bottom of the page from which
you can download additional photos.

The Liquid Bomb Hoax: The Larger Implications

The Liquid Bomb Hoax: The Larger Implications

by James Petras
www.dissidentvoice.org
August 25, 2006

The charges leveled by the British, US and Pakistani regimes that they uncovered a major bomb plot directed against nine US airlines is based on the flimsiest of evidence, which would be thrown out of any court, worthy of its name.

An analysis of the current state of the investigation raises a series of questions regarding the governments’ claims of a bomb plot concocted by 24 Brits of Pakistani origin.

The arrests were followed by the search for evidence, as the August 12, 2006 Financial Times states: “The police set about the mammoth task of gathering evidence of the alleged terrorist bomb plot yesterday.” (FT, August 12/, 2006) In other words, the arrests and charges took place without sufficient evidence -- a peculiar method of operation -- which reverses normal investigatory procedures in which arrests follow the “monumental task of gathering evidence.” If the arrests were made without prior accumulation of evidence, what were the bases of the arrests?

The government search of financial records and transfers turned up no money trail despite the freezing of accounts. The police search revealed limited amounts of savings, as one would expect from young workers, students and employees from low-income immigrant families.

"9/11 Eyewitness" is Probably Disinformation

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3211807290597119388&hl=en

"Blue Star Media Group" and Rick Siegel are suspect. Look at the speculative, misleading crap in the above trailer for "WMD at the WTC." The film actually claims that "directed energy hydrogen fusion" or thermonuclear devices were used to bring down the towers.

While their production quality and promotion is surprisingly strong (well funded) they seem to make up most of their "evidence" out of thin air.

The original "9/11 Eyewitness" arrived on the scene last year out of nowhere with a slick promotional burst and wide distribution. The "new evidence" in the movie seemed to be stretching it (to say the least) and the myopic focus on controlled demolition was quite suspicious.

Rick Siegel and friends appear to maintain the following slick websites:

http://www.911eyewitness.com/
http://www.striketheroot.org/
http://www.ricksiegel.com/
http://www.911citizenscourt.com/
http://www.onlinetv.us/index.php
http://www.onlinetv.com
http://www.911eyewitnesstruth.com/

None of these sites seem to link to credible 9/11 research and they all appear to be template module sites meant to look professional, respectable, and active. They mostly only link to each other and repeat the same content.

9/10: Loose Change to air on national tv in the Netherlands !

LOOSE CHANGE 2 (full version, dutch subtitles) broadcast in Europe!

BNN, Nederland 3, sunday september 10th from 23.40 till 01.00 hrs (monday september 11th!)
Source: http://www.mediacourant.nl/?p=1516

And at 9/11 itself a free screening of Loose Change will happen at De Balie Cinema in Amsterdam at 19:00 hrs as part of a 9/11 theme day with lectures, debates and more.
Source: http://www.debalie.nl/artikel.jsp?articleid=56500&podiumid=politiek

De Balie http://www.debalie.nl
Is a much repected national wide famous political and cultural debate center in Amsterdam.

BNN http://www.bnn.nl
Is a non-commercial broadcast organisation with airtime on national Dutch public radio & tv channels

Nederland 3 (Ned. 3) http://www.nederland3.nl
Is a much respected third national public tv channel of The Netherlands, comparable with BBC.

100% of the dutch population can receive this channel via air, cable, satellite or IP TV. Ned. 3 is also on cable systems in all the flemisch speaking parts of Belgium, Luxemburg and some cable systems in Germany. Because of overspill of aether transmitters, Ned. 3 is transmitting on air over the border into small regions of Germany and Belgium. (with sporadic good athmospheric conditions much further, even reaching Britain)

"No Planes" debunked here!!

The following is an exchange between me and Nico (Click on the images to see them separately, the second image might be cut of by the page);

I really feel sry for you Nico, you’re a hopeless case it seems.

“quot;...when the plane hits the building the momentum it carries with it translates into the direction of the impact....quot;

Nico: There is no crumbling of the walls. Are you blind?

Crumbling of walls? The walls are being blown out as the jet tanks in the wings and elsewhere explode. WTF do you mean "There is no crumbling of the walls"?

"...In that video the plane hits from the left..."

Nico: But according to the WABC7 live footage it couldn't have come from *this left direction. You ignored this all over again.

I don't give a shit about "WABC7", the plane is coming from the left hand side from the perspective that the video was taken.

"...the debris is hurled through the building and out the other side to the right...."

Nico: Which comes from internal explosives.

Really, Ronald Wieck, you should be better informed.

From http://www.conspiracysmasher.blogspot.com

Ronald Wieck said...
It is NOT "known" that Bush had heard of the first attacks before he left his hotel. Someone is making this up (I never heard this one before and the timeline makes it impossible).
The reasons for invading Iraq have never changed. People with agendas want to pretend that Bush claimed there was only one rationale for the war, but nobody ever believed that.
When did Cheney contend that UBL had nothing to do with the attacks? This claim is nonsense.
If Rumsfeld ever thought that Flight 93 was shot down, he certainly changed his opinion as more information became available.

It's tiresome. If you have something, tell us about it. Stop spreading falsehoods. You aren't investigating a controversy; you're creating one out of whole cloth.

11:17 PM

Sword of Twooth said...
Sorry Ronald. Wrong on all four counts.

1) Bush knew about attacks before leaving hotel.

http://forums.bluelemur.com/viewtopic.php?t=3601

Here is a transcript of an ABC report from that day:

'ABC News' Special Report:
(8:53 AM ET) Tuesday 11 September 2001

[SNIP]

JENNINGS: ...Want to check in very quickly with the president of the United States. John Cochran with the president in Florida. John:

HELMETS, FLAK JACKETS AND MACHINE GUNS CONFRONT NY 911 TRUTH

From: Luke
Date: Aug 25, 2006 3:26 PM

NYPD, THE G. : HELMETS, FLAK JACKETS AND MACHINE GUNS CONFRONT NY 911 TRUTH

Aug. 12, 2006

INCIDENT REPORT: SAT CIRCA 2 PM

LARGE POLICE VAN LABELED NYPD PARKS BEHIND 911 TRUTH BANNER
SECOND LARGE UNMARKED VAN WITH BLACKED OUT WINDOWS PARKS BEHIND NYPD VAN (possible video-audio surveillance van)

WHITE OFFICER EARLY TO MID 40S, WITHOUT BADGE , MILITARY LIKE CREW CUT, SUIT, IDENTIFIES HIMSELF TO 911 TRUTH AS PART OF NYPD "INTELLIGENCE"

THEN ASKS IF 911 TRUTH HAS PERMIT FOR BANNER, SAYS BANNER POLES REQUIRE A PERMIT

I TELL HIM THESE GUYS HAVE BEEN HERE FOR YEARS NOW, AND COURTS HAVE ALLOWED PROTESTS.
HE SAYS POLES REQUIRE PERMIT

L. JOINS DISCUSSION , SAYS WOOD POLES NOT PERMITTED, BUT POINTS OUT TO OFFICER THAT POLES ARE CARDBOARD
NYPD INTELLIGENCE SAYS HARD CARDBOARD IS NOT PERMITTED
POLICE OFFICER'S MANNER IS POLITE AT ALL TIMES AND NOT INFLAMMATORY OR THREATENING.
HOWEVER

2-3? BODY GUARDS, TO THIS MOST LIKELY SENIOR OFFICER WHO TRAVELS IN TWO VANS WITH SWAT PERSONNEL,