I think this guys is on our side, or he wouldn't have even bothered to write this article.

For the NY Times, this is probably as good as it's gonna get. For now.

By Jim Dwyer The New York Times
Published: September 1, 2006

U.S. moves to debunk 'alternative theories' on Sept. 11 attacks

http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/09/01/news/conspiracy.php

QUOTE
NEW YORK Faced with an angry minority of people who believe the Sept. 11 attacks were part of a shadowy and sprawling plot run by Americans, separate reports were published this week by the State Department and a federal science agency insisting that the catastrophes were caused by hijackers who used commercial airliners as weapons.

The official narrative of the attacks has been attacked as little more than a cover story by an assortment of radio hosts, academics, amateur filmmakers and others who have spread their arguments on the Internet and cable television in America and abroad. As a motive, they suggest that the Bush administration wanted to use the attacks to justify military action in the Middle East.

If you're looking for something to do tonight, tune in to the Friday Night Block Party on the Revere Radio Network. Robb Revere is on live right now (11pm EST)

LISTEN LIVE 8K
http://www.revereradio.net/e107/e107_plugins/wrap/wrap.php?3
LISTEN LIVE 32k
http://www.revereradio.net/e107/e107_plugins/wrap/wrap.php?1
LISTEN LIVE 128k
http://www.revereradio.net/e107/e107_plugins/wrap/wrap.php?2

More info:
http://www.revereradio.net

We've been hearing a lot lately about what if anything hit the towers. The "no plane theory" or different plane theory is being pushed by some.

All these arguments are irrelevent. So what if a different plane or no plane hit the towers. Or if mini-nukes were used instead of thermite or dynamite or what have you. 9-11 was still an inside job. It doesn't matter. This infighting is ridiculous. All these wild theories do, when pushed to the forefront, is scare away potential converts adn divide the movement.

---------

so having said that... Its time that we put aside our fueding and jump on the truth train and realize the only thoery that makes sense is one that's been under our noses the whole time. Yes I'm talking about the no-buildlings theory. If the planes were holograms, why would the CIA stop there? Why wouldn't they also fake the buildings too? duh!

You no planers are all so un-hip. If you really want to not exclude any possibilities you must embrace the no-building theory right now!! It is the new no plane theory.

http://www.petitiononline.com/nobs/petition.html

Visibility 9-11 welcomes to the program Kevin Ryan. Kevin is a former Site Manager working for Underwriters Laboratories, the company which certified the steel which was used in the construction of the World Trade Center twin towers. UL was also contracted by the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) to conduct tests of floor model assemblies of the WTC during their investigation on the trade center collapses. Kevin blew the whistle in November of 2004 with his letter to the director of the NIST investigation, Frank Gayle, raising questions about the outcome of the findings of the investigation. Kevin was subsequently fired in retaliation and has since been a force in exposing the fraud of September 11th. Kevin is a member of Scholars for 9-11 Truth and co-editor at the Journal of 9-11 Studies.

From FluxRostrum;

Here's the UTube post.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6c3192xCzk

there is now a bit torrent available for the big phat file. You can get the torrent on my site.
http://fluxrostrum.blogspot.com/2006/08/divide-911-music-video.html

I'm currently trying to enter it into Arrianna huffington's "Contagious Film Fest"
but the upload keeps crapping out...
http://cf.huffingtonpost.com/

If I can get it listed there a plug to vote for it would mean a lot...

Solidarity,
~FluxRostrum

For those who aren't familiar with Arizona radio talk show host Charles Goyette's recent interview with Popular Mechanics' Davin Coburn, have a listen to it before listening to the follow up phone call made to Mr. Coburn by "Jeff" from PUMPITOUT.com .

Charles Goyette Interview:
9/11 Debunking the Debunkers —"The Charles Goyette Show", interview with Popular mechanics' Davin Coburn Wed Aug 23, 2006

The Goyette Interview is also available on 911podcasts.

PUMPITOUT.com calls Davin Coburn of Popular Mechanics (Aug 29, 2006)
MP3 Download

Related:

3 Minute audio clip of Davin Coburn saying "'Pull It' is not a controlled demolition term" on the Charles Goyette Show. Included at the end of the audio clip is PUMPITOUT.com's phone call to Controlled Demolitions Inc. asking them "what does 'pull it' mean?"
MP3 Download

More calls at PUMPITOUT.com

NIST's World Trade Center FAQ
A Reply to the National Institute for Standards and Technology's
Answers to Frequently Asked Questions
by Jim Hoffman

Introduction

On August 30, 2006, the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) posted on their website a list of fourteen frequently asked questions (FAQ) and answers to them. NIST should be commended for at least addressing a number of the serious questions that have been raised with regard to its investigation. However, NIST's new FAQ avoids answering the central charges of its most visible critique, Building a Better Mirage.

* That NIST fails to support it's key assertion that "collapse initiation" automatically leads to "global collapse".

* That NIST uses the diversionary tactic of describing some events -- such as the airliner crashes -- in great detail, while almost completely avoiding the core question of what brought the Towers down.

* That NIST's report is internally inconsistent, supposing that steel columns were heated to temperatures hundreds of degrees in excess of the maximum temperatures indicated by its steel samples.

* That NIST fails to substantiate it's implied claim that its computer models predicted "collapse initiation".

* That NIST fails to even address most of the features of the Towers' destruction that are apparently unique to controlled demolitions.

[SNIP]

Continued at link.

Just heard, Barrie Zwicker will be hosting a special show on RBN ( www.RBNlive.com ) at 5 pm PT, 6 pm MT, 7 pm CT, 8 pm ET. (2 hours air time in total)

He will apparently have as a guest a certain Dr. Anderson. I am not sure of the exact theme but am sure it will be 9/11 related.

I have no further info, at this time.

This was announced today in the late afternoon by John Stadtmiller on RBN.

Should be interesting. There may be Shortwave coverage too, but I am not sure. Check the RBN site.

Streaming audio via internet: http://www.rbnlive.com/listen.html

Toll-free call-in number: 1 - 800 - 313 - 9443

PS Barrie Zwicker will also be filling in for John Stadtmiller on RBN on Sept. 12th, 2006 while John will be at the 9/11 events in NYC.

Enjoy the show !

Former High Level Government Insiders Speak Up About 9/11

...a list of many former insiders speaking up, along with specific quotes, mp3/video links, and articles.

Take a look

A good way of waking up newspapers - let's them know who's speaking up!

This article explains...

Impossible to Prove a Falsehood True:

Aircraft Parts as a Clue to their Identity by George Nelson Colonel, USAF (ret.)

Notable Quotes:

"It will soon be five years since the tragic events of 9/11/01 unfolded, and still the general public has seen no physical evidence that should have been collected at each of the four crash sites, (a routine requirement during mandatory investigations of each and every major aircraft crash.) The National Transportation Safety Board has announced on its website that responsibility for the investigations and reports have been assigned to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, but there is no indication that mandatory investigations were ever conducted or that the reports of any investigations have been written."

I received a great question by email today:

"[In the last couple of weeks,] the whole 911 truth movement seems to have gone to the dogs; everyone is attacking everyone else and calling them names. How to know the genuine article from the counterfeit?"

Indeed, many people are calling other people disinformation agents, or untrustworthy. How can we figure out who to trust and who not to trust?

I don't have any definitive answers. But my initial thought is that we should ask a couple of questions about someone, which will help us determine whether or not they are trustworthy.

Are they Putting Things in Context?

First, ask whether the person is helping to put 9/11 in historical context. For example, are they educating people about the history of false flag terror in Western countries? If you don't know what "false flag" means, start here.

Brzezinski, PNAC and the Bush administration are all important topics also. However, in my opinion, they are solely recent manifestations of the ancient history of false flag terror, which goes all the way back to ancient Rome. Educating people about the big picture concept of false flag terror is key.

I was just checking out that "no buildings petition", which I didn’t actually start but put in the thread anyway because it was funny, and becuase it kind of underlined the fact that nobody wants this "no planes" bs at 911blogger anymore. Anyway I go to check it and my name and everyone else’s is gone, and replaced with some bullshit with names like George Bush and Clinton etc. Here's the link; 

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/987047344

And just in case it gets f*cked with again here's a screen shot that a took;  

http://xs305.xs.to/xs305/06355/petition.jpg

(A response to the following thread: http://www.911blogger.com/node/2411)

As the movement gains more and more visibility and mainstream recognition, it is important for us to ask what the next steps should be and what our true goals really are.

Let us take the JFK case as an example--something like 70% of the public believe in a conspiracy, yet no justice or progress has been achieved.

9/11 Truth is on the brink of being acknowledged as a widespread (though still very fringe) alternative perspective. That doesn't mean that anything is going to change. We've got to realize that we're going up against the ENTIRE ESTABLISHMENT, and they're not gonna go quietly.

I personally do not expect to be able to "win" this battle and "get back to my life." Rather, this is a lifelong commitment to truth and progressive social change. If 9/11 Truth really does "come out," can you imagine what it's going to look like? What comes to your mind: Riots in the streets? A peaceful transition to fresh and honest government, media, and economic systems?

These are some of the questions that we must consider.

International Truth Movement
http://www.truthmove.org

Scholars for 9/11 truth in Ireland have had an ad in indymedia.ie removed from the website.
The notice was for the forthcoming -
'9/11 Truth: The Key to Stopping WW3’ by Webster Tarpley in Dublin.
Indymedia.ie have become notorious for censoring 9/11 Truth debates, any criticism of Noam Chomsky's views of 9/11 Truth - State Sponsored Terrorism or AIPAC/Israeli lobby.
Indymedia.ie responded to emails questioning why they removed the notice by pointing to their T&C's -
"The Independent Media Centre Network is a network of collectively run media outlets for the creation of radical, accurate, and passionate tellings of the truth. We work out of a love and inspiration for people who continue to work for a better world, despite corporate media's distortions and unwillingness to cover the efforts to free humanity."

http://www.indymedia.ie/about_us

They also accused Tarpley of being a recruiter for "Lyndon Larouche's far-right anti-semitic cult".
So, once again, any criticism of Zionist fascism is "anti-semitic".
Please note that the Independant Media center Network is a British based organisation & NOT IRISH.
In fact, their attitude to Irish people who express "radical, accurate, and passionate tellings of the truth' is at best patronising & at worst, censored. Therefore the past imperial relationship of master/slave between Britain & Ireland is being re-enforced by these lefty creeps.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcRs1fv8i3I

This sounds genuine -- you can hear one of the firemen say "we got to get back we got explosions right now".