Who Should We Trust?

I received a great question by email today:

"[In the last couple of weeks,] the whole 911 truth movement seems to have gone to the dogs; everyone is attacking everyone else and calling them names. How to know the genuine article from the counterfeit?"

Indeed, many people are calling other people disinformation agents, or untrustworthy. How can we figure out who to trust and who not to trust?

I don't have any definitive answers. But my initial thought is that we should ask a couple of questions about someone, which will help us determine whether or not they are trustworthy.

Are they Putting Things in Context?

First, ask whether the person is helping to put 9/11 in historical context. For example, are they educating people about the history of false flag terror in Western countries? If you don't know what "false flag" means, start here.

Brzezinski, PNAC and the Bush administration are all important topics also. However, in my opinion, they are solely recent manifestations of the ancient history of false flag terror, which goes all the way back to ancient Rome. Educating people about the big picture concept of false flag terror is key.

"No Buildings" Petition Got Hacked!!!!

I was just checking out that "no buildings petition", which I didn’t actually start but put in the thread anyway because it was funny, and becuase it kind of underlined the fact that nobody wants this "no planes" bs at 911blogger anymore. Anyway I go to check it and my name and everyone else’s is gone, and replaced with some bullshit with names like George Bush and Clinton etc. Here's the link;

And just in case it gets f*cked with again here's a screen shot that a took;

Important Questions: What Does "Victory" Look Like?

(A response to the following thread:

As the movement gains more and more visibility and mainstream recognition, it is important for us to ask what the next steps should be and what our true goals really are.

Let us take the JFK case as an example--something like 70% of the public believe in a conspiracy, yet no justice or progress has been achieved.

9/11 Truth is on the brink of being acknowledged as a widespread (though still very fringe) alternative perspective. That doesn't mean that anything is going to change. We've got to realize that we're going up against the ENTIRE ESTABLISHMENT, and they're not gonna go quietly.

I personally do not expect to be able to "win" this battle and "get back to my life." Rather, this is a lifelong commitment to truth and progressive social change. If 9/11 Truth really does "come out," can you imagine what it's going to look like? What comes to your mind: Riots in the streets? A peaceful transition to fresh and honest government, media, and economic systems?

These are some of the questions that we must consider.

International Truth Movement Censor 9/11 Advertising in Ireland

Scholars for 9/11 truth in Ireland have had an ad in removed from the website.
The notice was for the forthcoming -
'9/11 Truth: The Key to Stopping WW3’ by Webster Tarpley in Dublin. have become notorious for censoring 9/11 Truth debates, any criticism of Noam Chomsky's views of 9/11 Truth - State Sponsored Terrorism or AIPAC/Israeli lobby. responded to emails questioning why they removed the notice by pointing to their T&C's -
"The Independent Media Centre Network is a network of collectively run media outlets for the creation of radical, accurate, and passionate tellings of the truth. We work out of a love and inspiration for people who continue to work for a better world, despite corporate media's distortions and unwillingness to cover the efforts to free humanity."

They also accused Tarpley of being a recruiter for "Lyndon Larouche's far-right anti-semitic cult".
So, once again, any criticism of Zionist fascism is "anti-semitic".
Please note that the Independant Media center Network is a British based organisation & NOT IRISH.
In fact, their attitude to Irish people who express "radical, accurate, and passionate tellings of the truth' is at best patronising & at worst, censored. Therefore the past imperial relationship of master/slave between Britain & Ireland is being re-enforced by these lefty creeps.

Explosions at WTC

This sounds genuine -- you can hear one of the firemen say "we got to get back we got explosions right now".

9/11 Bloglines (09/01)
1 September, 2006

NY Villager mentions Haupt and TV Fakery
am New York covers "911 Skeptics"
Loose Change in Turkish Newspaper
"Here is a REAL Airplane Crash @ 500MPH"
Griffin on Hannity/Colmes Friday 09/01 on Malloy/Tarpley Air America Scandal
ScrewLoose on new "explosion video"
9/11: More Info On Upcoming WND Hit Campaign
Jersey Girls to speak out on "9/11 Report" again
GeorgeWash: "Animations of Planes Hitting the Twin Towers"
Jim Hoffman in Kansas City - 9/2/2006
Total911: "How FEMA drugged 9/11 Pentagon witnesses"
Eric Hufschmid about the "WING TV/Bollyn affair"
Whereabouts of historic 9/11 flag unknown - UPI
9/11 Explosion caught on tape
Planehuggers' desperate satire attempt: "No Building Petition"
MP3 download: Griffin claims NORAD Tapes are doctored
"9/11 Blogs Infiltrated"
Barry Zwicker on Canadian CKNW 98
Real Time Video Manipulation Exists 911 Conspiracy Theories You Decide
Archived: David Ray Griffin on "Guns and Butter"
Mike Malloy apparently canned from Air America

Here is a REAL Airplane Crash @ 500MPH (Video Link)

Here's a video of a controlled crash to demonstrate how fragile planes really are: South Tower super slow-mo for comparison:



Picture of North Tower (formerly mislabled as South Tower) "plane" impact. Notice the right wing tip? Aluminum through structural steel???





South Tower:


Educate Military Families on No Iraq-9/11 Connection GWB Quote

We should take advantage of this. How about a campaign to inform military bases, families, etc that Bush has admitted NO connection between Iraq and 9/11?

Nafeez Ahmed: US Army Contemplates Redrawing Middle East Map to Stave-off Looming Global Meltdown

US Army Contemplates Redrawing Middle East Map to Stave-off Looming Global Meltdown

by Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed

In a little-noted article printed in early August in the Armed Forces Journal, a monthly magazine for officers and leaders in the United States military community, early retired Major Ralph Peters sets out the latest ideas in current US strategic thinking. And they are extremely disturbing.

Ethnically Cleansing the Entire Middle East

Maj. Peters, formerly assigned to the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Intelligence where he was responsible for future warfare, candidly outlines how the map of the Middle East should be fundamentally re-drawn, in a new imperial endeavour designed to correct past errors. "Without such major boundary revisions, we shall never see a more peaceful Middle East," he observes, but then adds wryly: "Oh, and one other dirty little secret from 5,000 years of history: Ethnic cleansing works."

Thus, acknowledging that the sweeping reconfiguration of borders he proposes would necessarily involve massive ethnic cleansing and accompanying bloodshed on perhaps a genocidal scale, he insists that unless it is implemented, "we may take it as an article of faith that a portion of the bloodshed in the region will continue to be our own." Among his proposals are the need to establish "an independent Kurdish state" to guarantee the long-denied right to Kurdish self-determination. But behind the humanitarian sentiments, Maj. Peters declares that: "A Free Kurdistan, stretching from Diyarbakir through Tabriz, would be the most pro-Western state between Bulgaria and Japan."

Save Mike Malloy video!!

Here's a copy of the email I sent to AAR:

To whom it may concern,

This e-mail is submitted in support of Mike Malloy.

I was stunned to learn that Mike has been fired from AAR. As a listener, it's really important to me that you know how disappointed I am with
your decision.

I believe you will come to regret letting Mike go. He is the only AAR radio host that has demonstrated true courage and righteous outrage over what has taken place in our country. I place the events of 9/11 at the very top of that list.

Not even Randi Rhodes has shown the level of true patriotism we need now, in order to expose the depth of corruption, to which the Bush administration has sunk.

Your termination of Mike Malloy has the effect of condoning the actions of this corrupt administration in as much as it is apparent that you are censoring the views expressed by Mike.

True progressives are not blind to the fact that this action qualifies AAR as being nothing more than a left-wing gatekeeper.

The fact that you would take this action so close to the mid-term elections only intensifies the utter contempt I now hold for AAR and it's affiliate stations.

To say that you should feel shame is not only an understatement, but an obvious waste of text. Your organization clearly has no shame.


Some of you may have seen the news regarding the families and the anniversary. They are going to call for a new investigation into the attacks of 9/11.

Chris Bell, and several others posted 1000's of email addresses here. And phone numbers as well.

Thanks to them.

There are also several other available lists...

The families are doing their part, and we have to do EVERYTHING within our power to back them up.


If you can be there to support the families that day, please do.


President Bush to visit all 3 sites on 5th anniversary of 9-11

President Bush to visit all three sites on 9/11 anniversary

Published: Thursday August 31, 2006

Although specific details haven't yet been released, the White House announced today that President Bush would be visiting "all three sites" on the fifth anniversary of 9/11.

During a press gaggle held aboard Air Force One on Thursday afternoon, Deputy White House spokesperson Dana Perino announced the news when asked by a reporter for a "preview" of the president's planned events for the day.

"No, we have not announced all of those details yet," said Perino.

"The one thing I can say is that the President will visit all three sites on the anniversary," Perino continued.

Perino also said that there may be "additional travel" but that she wasn't "able to reveal that yet."

The 9/11 Commission: Underfunded, Stonewalled, and Conflicted

Guys, I've been working on a column on 9/11 for a few months now, and it's turning out to be much longer than I originally intended it to be. It's actually nearly book-length now, with over 200 pages completed. My goal is to make it as readable and accessible as possible -- almost a "9/11 Inside Job for Dummies."

Thought I'd share a sample chapter/section with you on the 9/11 Commission. Still needs to be edited down, properly footnoted, and corrected for syntax, but I thought I'd pass it along. Let me know if there's anything I got blatantly wrong, or anything you'd suggesting adding:

Keith Olbermann Delivers One Hell Of a Commentary on Rumsfeld


Keith had some very choice words about Rumsfeld’s "fascism" comments tonight. Watch it, save it and share it.

For video links see here

Olbermann delivered this commentary with fire and passion while highlighting how Rumsfeld’s comments echoes other times in our world’s history when anyone who questioned the administration was coined as a traitor, unpatriotic, communist or any other colorful term. Luckily we pulled out of those times and we will pull out of these times.

Remember - Rumsfeld did not just call the Democrats out yesterday, he called out a majority of this country. This wasn’t only a partisan attack, but more so an attack against the majority of Americans.

The transcript of Keith’s comments tonight is available below the fold.

The Road Behind, The Road Ahead.

Smart and ingenious, offers no implied distinction between benevolent and diabolical.

The blurring of the line between church and state, was the strongest signal to many people (not enough at the time) that George was a piece of shit from day one, if only for his willingness to blur that very line. He demonstrated his willingness to burn the constitution, before he was even elected by so publicly flaunting his faith "respecting one form of religion, at the loss of another". He sent this message to the people who forgot why this was a dangerous thing, and also to the very people who knew how this could be played to financial gain. A piece of scum, no matter how you try to clean it up.

9/11 was a bet, a bet played by a group of very calculating people. Beyond calculating the necessary demolition techniques, the DoD foil, and the extent of media and every other manipulated complicity possible.... their BIGGEST gamble was most likely; What level of gullibility had the populous attained?

My suspicion, is that the timing of 9/11 was narrowed into a window of opportunity, "just before it will be too late to get away with it." Gullibility through heavy mass media addiction, debit loading, mental distance between the concepts of possible vs. plausible, the growing popularity of Religiosity, and the emerging global decline of American respectability in general.... all of that, vs. an America waking up on her own, facing her GDP slack-y-ness, and a re-emergence of secular pragmatism.