911blogger.com seeks to cover a broad spectrum of news, posts in the blogs section are the responsibility of the poster, readers are encouraged to check the facts and form their own conclusions.
The Infowars article on the NIST WTC 7 Report is available in A5 booklet form as a downloadable PDF.
I have added: a brief introduction, for people new to this information.
More images, to aid comparison of WTC 7's fires with more severe ones in other steel-frame skyscrapers, which did not collapse.
A note exposing the deceptive, restricted analysis performed by NIST to support their claim re. collapse speed.
Useful comments from 9/11 Blogger members and readers at Infowars.
Links to archives of the NIST news conference, the AE911Truth one, the No Lies Radio interview with Dr Sunder, the NIST Report PDF, Arabesque's roundup of responses to the report and the Journal of 9/11 Studies.
Eye-catching title graphics.
Download, free, from www.mediafire.com/?sharekey=ac1039fd00817eecd2db6fb9a8902bda
There's little news value to this, I know. But, honestly, f*ck Fox News.
They're at it again. This time it's Arianne Cohen (where the heck is Benjamin Chertoff? I thought this was his baby?). It should be noted that Ms. Cohen makes no mention of PM's own gaffes on the causes of the collapse of WTC7. It's quite an interesting read.
6 Debunked 9/11 Conspiracy Claims From Today's NIST Report
By Arianne Cohen
Published on: August 21, 2008
(Photograph by AP/Wide World Photos)
If you happen to be in the greater San Diego area please feel free to join our weekly Sunday protest at 4:00pm sharp at the end of Diamond Street in Pacific Beach. If you can't make it, please feel free to copy us and start a weekly Sunday protest ride in you neck of the woods.
"...and there are going to be all kinds of efforts to subvert your work, all kinds of efforts to corrupt your work, and all kinds of efforts to discredit you. Please understand that! and take it in the spirit in which it is being given, because this is what WILL HAPPEN and probably IS HAPPENING. So, PLEASE! Your work is too important, your mission is too precious! Be careful in EVERY ASPECT of the work! Make sure your allegations, your claims are WELL FOUNDED, because if THEY ARE NOT, you will be discredited." -- William F Pepper
(8 Minute Video)
Pepper said these words years ago. Pepper is my personal hero and a living legacy. His advice should be branded to our hearts. I thought of him today.
The long awaited sequel to the most viewed internet documentary of all time, "Zeitgeist, The Movie",
will premiere on October 2nd 2008, as the opening night feature of the 5th Annual Artivists Film Festival,
in Los Angeles CA. Upon the conclusion of the work, a Q & A will commence with the creator,
Peter Joseph, and his guests.
It will be released online for free viewing the next day, October 3rd, 2008
Tickets for the premiere will be available soon through http://www.artivists.org
Here is the trailer for the new work:
The work claims to offer the solution(s) to the problems we are facing today.
According to the website, a new "activism" website will be launched at the same
time the film is released.
feedback, ideas, link/logic/fact checking, etc. appreciated. This one is too long, i think, and i still could've put a lot more stuff into it, but my goal is mainly to introduce info to new people and interest them in following the links, i'm just summarizing research others have done.
9/11 Truth, Part 6 of 11: Air Defense “Failures”, Simultaneous War Games & Continuity of Government
Click here for all the articles in the 9/11 Truth Overview Series
This article summarizes some of the events concerning the 4 hijacked flights on 9/11, provides information on standard air defense procedures and warnings received prior to 9/11 and gives a brief overview of the multiple war games and military operations surrounding 9/11, including Continuity of Government planning. Links are provided for more in depth research.
Air Defense “Failures”:
Richard Gage, AIA, while on the phone with Jason Bermas of the Alex Jones Radio Show, unwittingly brings new light on the subject of 9-11 to an unsuspecting American citizen.
Nothing compares to witnessing someone new wake up to the truth about 9-11.
Nearly seven years out from 9/11, and disinformation remains a persistent problem within the 9/11 Truth movement. Part of the problem has been that sites like 911blogger.com have been slow to label blatant disinformation as such. Back in April, I noted that certain topics would no longer be tolerated here. In the interim, two of these topics were introduced in a U.S. District Court in New York, setting a poor benchmark for future 9/11 Truth-related cases in New York. It's now time for a firmer, (and admittedly glaringly late), stance on Fakery, DEW, and "SBHT" syndrome, here at 911blogger.
To start, let's skip back to 9/11/2001;
"So did you hear?"
"An airplane hit the World Trade Center this morning."
"What kind? You mean, a little plane?"
"I don't know, just 'a plane'. It was on the radio."
Immediately, something didn't seem quite right. I thought that it could have been a small commuter plane, but not a jumbo, not with contemporary guidance and radar systems. No way. However, before long, the radio was delivering the news of a second plane strike. Definitely a big jet.
This was an attack.
Aircraft struck the twin towers. It's very likely that they were Boeings, and it's also probable* that they were the very Boeings that the media reported as "hijacks". It seems absurd to have to say these things, but the fact of the matter is, there is a disinformation campaign afoot, largely confined to a handful of sites and YouTube, to trick people into thinking that "no planes" hit the Towers, that the objects that hit the Towers were cloaked in holograms, or were holographs, and that digital alterations were made to broadcast footage on the fly, on 9/11.
If this were the case, then there would be no video or photographs in existence that are basically anomaly free, depicting the 2nd aircraft hitting the other WTC tower, but this is not the case;
It's just not the case.
This summer I managed to read at least one book "The Best Democracy Money Can Buy" (2002) by Greg Palast. Excellent book and I am telling everone around me to read it. With this book you can understand how the PNAC projet is so possible.
Said to myself that this guy with his intellectual capacitiy should have interesting things to say on 911 so looked up on youtube
wiewing these videos I was so disappointed that he could be just another 911 gate keeper like Noam Chomsky:
But was pleased to see all the videos that he has done on Youtube
Would it be possible that WeAreChange interview Greg Palast on 911 ?
The Andrews Air Force Base Stand Down: How the 'Capital Guardians' Failed to Guard the Capital on 9/11
"Thank God that guy's there! Where has he been?"
- Firefighter Mike Smith, upon seeing the first military fighter jetarriving over the Pentagon, 10:40 a.m., September 11, 2001
At the time the 9/11 attacks began, many of the pilots with the District of Columbia Air National Guard (DCANG) were in the headquarters of the 121st Fighter Squadron at Andrews Air Force Base, Maryland. They had been suspicious upon learning of the first crash in New York, but when a second plane hit the World Trade Center the emergency became obvious. "We're under a terrorist attack!" someone yelled. One DCANG officer at the base exclaimed, "Well, holy shit, if this is a terrorist attack, we need to get something in the air!" According to Lt. Col. Steve Chase, who was at the operations desk there: "People just launched into action. There was a buzz in the unit." 
Story Linking to 9/11Truth.org was Picked Up by Hundreds of Mainstream News Sources Including NEWSWEEK
Go Comment @Newsweek
I posted it here on Thursday
9/11Truth.org Has 7 Implosion Video on Home/opening page
Feds: Fire took down building next to twin towers
Government scientists rebut conspiracy theories, say fire brought down trade center building
By DEVLIN BARRETT Associated Press Writer | AP
Aug 21, 2008
"The public should really recognize the science is really behind what we have said," he said, adding: "The obvious stares you in the face."
— — —
On the Net:
National Institute of Standards and Technology: http://www.nist.gov/
9/11 Truth: http://www.911truth.org/
My Google search for: "Feds: Fire took down building next to twin towers" ap , yielded 11,000 results. Not all are linking to 9/11Truth'
The White House and U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) are urging Americans to return to the stone age for their own safety.
"After discovering that 'thermal expansion' of steel from a low-temperature fire led to the collapse of World Trade Center building 7," said NIST spokesperson Noh Wei, "we started realizing that other metal objects might also be at risk".
So NIST scientists tested other metallic objects using state-of-the-art computer models. The models predicted that every oven and barbeque in the country could disintegrate at any time, leading to a progressive collapse of entire houses.
"We also determined that car engines, airplane engines, and boat engines could all suddenly fail due to thermal expansion," said Wei. "Indeed, we soon realized that almost all industrial processes could lead to catastrophic failure, other than, perhaps, those used in freezers."
White House spokesman Phil Johnson agreed, saying