Source: Rawstory.com

Ron Brynaert
Published: Thursday October 12, 2006

Early Thursday morning, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice denied that she gave the "brush-off" to an "impending terrorist attack" warning by former C.I.A. director George J. Tenet and his counterterrorism coordinator in July of 2001, two months before the September 11 attacks, which was first reported in Washington Post investigative reporter's Bob Woodward's latest book State of Denial.

The former National Security Adviser, interviewed on Detroit's Paul Smith Show on WJRI Radio, said that the "assertion that [she] would hear about a specific attack and not do anything" is "obviously just not true."

"On July 10, 2001, the book says, Mr. Tenet and his counterterrorism chief, J. Cofer Black, met with Ms. Rice at the White House to impress upon her the seriousness of the intelligence the agency was collecting about an impending attack," David E. Sanger reported for the New York Times in September. "But both men came away from the meeting feeling that Ms. Rice had not taken the warnings seriously."

Mike Berger's "Improbable Collapse" has received several good reviews, and comes highly recommended by 911Truth.org

A look at the collapse of the World Trade Towers and WTC 7 by Scholars for 9/11 Truth. Including Steven E. Jones, Kevin Ryan, and Dr. David Ray Griffin.

Please show support for the makers of this film.

http://www.improbablecollapse.com/

They call us nuts. Time to put up or shut up! If they feel so confident what better way then to show it to the
masses then to face us in a national televized event!
Ed Haas has already tried once to set up a national debate.The first time they ran like cock roaches when the lights turn on.Now they pushed it out for months,and still the NIST,9/11 Commission,Popular Mechanic run,and hide!
This event needs to be an all day event,advertized a week in advance.Covered by FOX,ABC,CBS,NBC.
There you go Mr Orilley.......TIME TO PUT UP OR SHUT UP!

I'd like to start by recognizing the obviously big news that South Park, in whatever way, has chosen to give exposure to the truth movement. It is a fascinating development no matter how big or small their audience, no matter which truth site they advertised, no matter their treatment, fair or unfair of the subject. It is a blip on the radar and that is all that matters. These blips are currently being picked up by more and more people in more and more walks of life. One of those walks of life with which I am most acquainted is the walk of students and other members of the Harvard community through their daily routine. Last night I pulled of a hat-trick--three DVDs handed out to three passing students--the tendency for people to follow an example is evident in this and other cases--when people see others doing something, they are curious, and want to add to their knowledge of the world around them by participating in whatever it is, or at least taking an interest as an informed spectator. The more people look like them and talk like them, the more likely they are to be receptive to the new thing they see the people doing. Right now, one thing a lot of people around Harvard are doing is becoming familiar with the issue of 9/11. More and more people are posting links to message boards, sharing DVDs, emailing their friends, talking in the dining halls, and personally waking up to an unfamiliar but gripping reality. We need not make matrix references at this point--what is happening is not a movie and drawing the parallel is an exercise in redundancy. We live in a manufactured reality, and until now the creation of meaning and truth has been confined to the few while the many have trusted--very important that word--that they were getting the whole story. Sadly they have been deceived. Fortunately they are realizing it at a breathtaking pace.

Why Indeed did the WTC Buildings Disintegrate?

A peer-review of Steven E. Jones' 9/11 Research

by Morgan Reynolds and Judy Wood

Added several images, further proving that molten aluminum does not retain a silvery color when elevated to higher temperatures. This contradicts Professor Steven Jones' research, which makes the (false) assumption that aluminum would be silvery at ~1500° C simply because it's silvery at ~600° C.

Once I made the transition form investigating the truth, to dispersing it, I thought at first that others would easily recognize what's going on. But instead was called many nasty names, considered crazy or gullible, or grossly misguided. I realized that although its easiest to get thru to those who trust me implicitly, or those who have always thought the government was behind a lot of evil crap, it was still difficult to get thru even to a Bush or Republican hater, and impossible to get thru to the white house supporters and true skeptics. For the last 3 weeks, I've used everyone that I've spoken to as test subjects. I've studied reactions to words like "conspiracy", "theory", and "activist", and discovered that these words are damaging. Conspiracy implies paranoia, theory implies unsupported by validated facts, and activist implies politically anti-bush, republican, or government.

I've gauged the results of talking to people based on "over the phone", "in person", and "in person with evidence in hand". The results are obvious, you are less likely to ever succeed over the phone unless the receiver follows up with viewing DVDs or goes on line after to review the evidence, and its too easy for them to cut you off and hang up. You have a better chance in person, but you still need to trust that they will review further on their own, and your best chance is to have the evidence in hand when referring to it, at least the first 3 or 4 things. If you validate the first few pieces of evidence, it provides more validity to what you will divulge after. Talking about what you’ve read or heard, bears much less weight unless you have the proof in hand. We have been conditioned to be skeptical of what reporters write as they are capable of telling half-truths, twisting the truth, omitting the truth, or blatantly lying. So how can you battle the paradox of supporting “I read this article…”…or “this reporter said this…” when many prefer not to believe everything they read in the papers. I’ve heard it a couple of times “you believe everything you read?”, followed by a skeptical laugh.

Here's the Methaddicts' lie about the molten steel.  This pretty much amounts to their claim: the steel melted because the rubble piles were insulated from the atmosphere and so the temperatures kept rising up to the point at which the steel melted.  Yep.  They claim they heard this from three experts, yet the paragraph is cleverly embedded so that one may not notice that the three allegedly making this claim are not in fact the three experts mentioned in the subsequent paragraphs, who are named and make much more reasonable and less relevant claims themselves.  I would eat Davin Coburn's hat if the three named experts were to claim they were responsible for the absurd "pressure cooker" theory of the molten steel in the rubble piles, or if PM actually would deign to name the sources who really did make these absurd claims which are patently false.  I may not have the time, so I encourage others to run with this straight at PM and their cult-like following, including John McCain.

I heard Davin "DNA" Coburn from Propoganda Mechanics on another radio show and a caller asked him
if he had ever heard of Operation Northwoods. He claimed he hadnt heard of it which I find hard to
believe as he is meant to have fully researched internet conspiracy theorists. He went on to say that his
boys are happy to look at any new evidence and we should send it to them.

So I have done just that. I sent a pdf of Northwoods to them and, as is usual in such cases, I have recieved
no reply. I am calling on you to send any smoking gun evidence you have to them. If you dont get a reply ring
them.

popularmechanics@hearst.com is the email

212-649-2000 is the phone number

212-586-5562 is the fax number

Some time ago you will remember the "Call to Action" by Alex Jones regarding the next false flag attack possibly on American soil. A lot of us rose to the occasion and compiled media emails for USA & Canada and fired them off.

I personally fired emails to all of Canada media and most of the USA, asking the media to stand up and report on the false flags and also the inconsistencies in the official story in general. Yesterday I received an email from THE CANADIAN NATIONAL NEWSPAPER stating that they ran a story on 911. Take a look.

http://www.agoracosmopolitan.com/home/Frontpage/2006/10/10/01242.html

Maybe the tide is now turning, however, we need to keep the pressure up.

Dear President Bok,

I appreciate your reply. I must however take issue with the notion that I would expect Harvard to wish to or be able to review every report and/or document with which Harvard professors are associated. I would expect that it could and would moreover review one in particular that shocks the conscience as profoundly as the 9/11 Commission Report. It is also a fact that Professor May is teaching a course on the subject and in the process more than likely conveying false information to Harvard students (unless of course he is in the process of disavowing the report which is not born out by the course description.)

I urge you to reconsider your position as this issue is currently gaining widespread interest among the Harvard community and you will find that the facts are not on the side of the Commission, its report, or current conventional "wisdom". If indeed you have considered the facts and in your judgement they do not merit further scrutiny of Professor May's teaching that is your prerogative. If, however, you have not studied the issue closely I respectfully recommend that you do and take appropriate measures, lest Harvard continue to serve as the vehicle for a criminal falsification of history that is currently unraveling and will soon be exposed. It will certainly not be arguable down the line that Harvard was misled or was not aware of the problems with the status quo if its leadership decides to dismiss without further study this most urgent of matters.

Host: D. L. Abrahamson

Just a reminder to listeners that False Flag News now airs at 9 p.m to 10 p.m. (EST M-F). DL will probably have a lot to say about the plane hitting the highrise in NYC today.

Call in to have your say:

(800) 313-9443

9 p.m. to 10 p.m. EST

Listen live:
http://rbnlive.com/listen.html

Archive will be posted here:
http://mp3.rbnlive.com/Dan06.html

Here's D. L. Abrahamson's website:
http://www.falseflagnews.com/

STAN Jones running for Senate from Montana Libertarian, tells the Truth about Globalization, North American UNION, our new money the AMERO and the NAFTA SUPER Hwy.

Related (This is dope!): CNN Video:Lou Dobbs Slams CFR & North American Union

http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/42867/

Study: More than 600,000 Dead in Iraq

By John Tirman, AlterNet. Posted October 11, 2006.

A researcher associated with a brand new mortality study is blunt to critics: 'its accuracy is not an issue... those who publicly dismiss the findings must offer an alternative.'

The new mortality survey of Iraq that estimates 600,000 deaths by violence is startling, and should alter the way America thinks about this war.

The John Hopkins University researchers were meticulous about the methods used to randomly choose the survey sites and analyze the data. It is state-of-the-art work, and its accuracy is not an issue. The survey is the only scientific account of the war dead. There is no other, and those who publicly dismiss the findings must offer an alternative. There is none. Every other account is deeply flawed in method, and this one is not. It is standard in epidemiology and disaster response.

WASHINGTON — The American Al Qaeda spokesman known as "Azzam the American" will be indicted Wednesday by a federal grand jury in Los Angeles, FOX News has confirmed.

The two guys above are known collectively as Adam Yahiye Gadahn ??????????

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,219861,00.html

http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/10/11/plane.crash.ap/index.html

A small aircraft has crashed into a NY building.

Sirens everywhere. Reports that a plane hit a high-rise building on Manhattan's upper east side.

Guns & Butter
Wednesday, October 11, 2006, 1:00PM Pacific

"Wayne Madsen & William Pepper Speak at the Fifth Anniversary of 9/11 in New York"
Speeches by Washington, D.C. based investigative journalist, Wayne Madsen, and attorney and author, William Pepper, at events marking the Fifth Anniversary of 9/11 in New York City in September, 2006. Fundraiser for KPFA Radio in Berkeley.

Five years on the air and still going strong, Guns and Butter is the only show on KPFA that has consistently provided in-depth coverage of alternative 9/11 analysis.

Please show your support by caling in a pledge at 800-439-5732 during air-time today, from 1-2pm. If you don't want to or can't afford to pledge, you can still support us by calling the listener comments line at 510-848-6767 x 622 and saying something nice about the show.

Airing live at 1pm Pacific on KPFA 94.1FM Berkeley, and streaming and archived at www.kpfa.org

www.gunsandbutter.net

By Donna Marsh O’Connor
Mother of Vanessa Lang Langer, WTC Tower II, 93rd floor
October 11, 2006

If the American people have, indeed, free and fair elections the Republicans and George W. Bush’s free pass will be voted out this November. These are the three key notes George W. Bush hit today, October 11th, 2006 in the mode of the authoritative father, the ultimate use of paternal rhetoric:

The economy is strong, stupid.

I went to war with Iraq and will the stay the course there because it was the right thing to do.

There is no red line as it pertains to North Korean threats against us because Japan and China will be with us. Hear this loud, America: There is no red line that Bush will name before the election. There is no plan for our defense.

It might seem that the American press corps is getting smarter, more efficient, posing more difficult questions about our actual safety as we face a blatant warning from North Korea. It might seem so because they actually asked Bush about the dissonance in his rhetoric and actions regarding North Korea and, too, about Iraq, but when, after a horrible explanation of the apparent contradictions in Bush/Cheney policy (we mistakenly attacked Iraq without enough backing from the rest of the world, without pursuing diplomacy) Bush has learned from these mistakes. He has learned that when actual threats are made against our country, that is the time to erase a red line, to say “Japan and China will help us. It didn’t work in Iraq.”

Google seems to be playing the games with all 9/11 videos. Terrorstorm was knocked out of the top
10 videos a couple weeks ago, with Google admitting an "ERROR" in the counter system. Well now that the video has come back to be #83 on most watched list, Google has frozen the counter. For over 5 days the counter has remained at under 160,000. People are going crazy on the google comment section...

Here is the link... then click "comments" to see..

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4757274759497686216

AUDIO: William Rodriguez Speaks Out
Submitted by davidswanson on Wed, 2006-10-11

William Rodriguez is a native of Puerto Rico, a citizen of the United States, and a resident of the State of New Jersey. On September 11, 2001, and for approximately 19 years prior thereto, Rodriguez was employed as a maintenance worker at the World Trade Center (WTC) in New York, N.Y.

On 9/11, Rodriguez single-handedly rescued fifteen (15) people from the WTC, and as Rodriguez was the only person at the site with the master key to the North Tower stairwells, he bravely led firefighters up the stairwell, unlocking doors as they ascended, thereby aiding in the successful evacuation of unknown hundreds of those who survived.

Listen to this message from William:

http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/node/14587

This dosen't have anything to do with 911, but it does show how a BIG secret can be kept for a LONG time among ALOT of people for PERSONAL gain.

I saw this, this morning on ESPN's Cold Pizza. It talks about how the Gaints stold pitching signs to come back and win the world series, and how everyone kept the secret nearly 50 years.

This is amazing; he even has an eyewitness in NY who's also a Structural Engineer who states that the Towers collapses’ were “perfect controlled demolitions”. So there was an eyewitness Structural Engineer saying they were demoed ON THE DAY! All this bullshit from “popular mechanics” about no Structural Engineers blah blah blah is a TON OF CRAP!

Part 1

Part 2

Part 3

Ashcroft Responds To 9/11 Foreknowledge Charges
Former Attorney General confronted on radio show, claims reports he stopped flying commercial before September 11 2001 false, war on terror not a money making scheme for some

Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | October 10 2006

Former Attorney General John Ashcroft has been confronted on a nationally syndicated radio show about why he stopped flying commercial before 9/11 and other issues of government complicity in the attacks. Ashcroft's terse and evasive responses to the questions do not match the facts.

After accepting an invitation to briefly appear with Ashcroft on Chicago's Mancow program, radio host Alex Jones grilled the former Governor of Missouri on why he was warned to avoid using commercial airliners in the weeks before 9/11.

The two best papers on the collapse of the towers are the jones and griffin paper "why the towers collapsed" They are sourced and scientific. If a movie was made summing
up their main points that was a slickly produced as Loose Change it would spread. They have so many quotes and contradictions to NIST specifically and the flawed investigation.
Although movies like loose change and 9/11 mysteries are good, the jones 12 points he brings up and the contradictions articulated in a entertaining video format would be very nice
to see.

Points that are brought up in the jones paper that need to be spread in a new loose change type movie

1. evaporated steel
2. molten metal
3. nist claim that they only investigated the "pre collapse events, not the subsequent collapses"
4. Nist floor models that did not melt or sag, so they resorted to computer modeling that was rigged. (read jones paper)
5.The samples from the fire area that only showed evidence of fire reaching a max of 250c, no more
6. windows not breaking
7. bright orange reaction that fits thermite reaction like a glove.
8. block above impact area that turns into dust in midair. (how could it crush the rest of the building if it turned into dust?)

At appx 3.5 seconds into the video, you can see a squib on the collapsing tower, near the bottom middle of the screen. There is no reasonable way to explain this occurance via “the pancaking” theory. This squib appears to be around 35-40 floors below the actual collapse when it first appears. I froze the the squib from the video and made a "still" . I am guessing the debunkers will claim this was caused from "air pressure," which would mean the other 35-40 floors were "air tight." (impossible)

http://rattube.com/blog1/2006/10/10/wtc-2-demolition-911/

Alex Jones is really on the case. Not only did he predict 9/11 but in this broadcast which started just an hour after the towers fell he is already talking about operation northwoods. Its a riveting listen.

http://www.infowars.net/articles/October2006/111006Broadcast.htm

Yes, finally. After being assaulted with the Maddox 9-11 page over and over again, and having no quick response, I am glad someone went and made an excellent article debunking his page.

It is partly satire (featuring redone cartoons) but also a serious debunking - like giving links to NIST and pop-mech debunk sites - as well as posting 3 full-length Alex Jones movies.

It answers all his accusations and statements.

Debunking Maddox

Makes a nice response link in the forums. :)

I feel ashamed. I always say "these people were willing to kill upwards of 250,000 innocent civilians in the Middle East, and you're going to tell me they weren't willing to kill 2973?" Little did I know that I was WAY OFF.

600,000+ individuals have been killed as a result of our invasion. I don't understand how Americans can sit idly by and allow this genocide to take place. In OUR names. Based on obvious lie after obvious lie. Americans have blood on their hands, and it is STICKY.

Expose the truth behind 9/11, and bring our troops home.

Source: NYTimes.com

By SABRINA TAVERNISE and DONALD G. McNEIL Jr.
Published: October 11, 2006

BAGHDAD, Oct. 10 — A team of American and Iraqi public health researchers has estimated that 600,000 civilians have died in violence across Iraq since the 2003 American invasion, the highest estimate ever for the toll of the war here.

A New Estimate of Civilian Deaths The figure breaks down to about 15,000 violent deaths a month, a number that is quadruple the one for July given by Iraqi government hospitals and the morgue in Baghdad and published last month in a United Nations report in Iraq. That month was the highest for Iraqi civilian deaths since the American invasion.

Came across this article in the Israeli paper Ha'aretz about how unlucky poor Larry was with the whole 9/11 thing, and how bravely he weathered the tragedy... here's an excerpt:

Silverstein told his friends in Israel that for the next five years, he will be busy rehabilitating the site. It's the last project of my life, he explained to an Israeli acquaintance. To advance his project, Silverstein needs the support of politicians. He has paid three visits to Washington since September 11. As the largest private donor to Hillary Clinton, he has an open door to the office of the junior senator from New York. Other senators who received hefty donations from Silverstein have said that they are in favor of the project at Ground Zero.

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=97338&contrassID=3...

So where else has Lucky Larry spread his political largesse?

http://opensecrets.org/indivs/search.asp?txtName=silverstein&txtState=NY...

Oh, Hillary, say it ain't so!

Check out this patronising podcast from all the popular mechanics liars.

Notice that they dont balance it with an opposing view, they start by inferring that all people who disbelieve theofficial story are anti jewish, they claim that all 9/11 researchers are amateur, they say "conspiracy theorists" at least a thousand times without actually mentioning people who are conducting academic research. its just appalling,

 http://www.odeo.com/show/1783494/view