Support 911Blogger


911blogger.com seeks to cover a broad spectrum of news, posts in the blogs section are the responsibility of the poster, readers are encouraged to check the facts and form their own conclusions.

French President Nicolas Sarkozy friend says 9/11 was a lie

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/2712363/French-President-Nicolas-Sarkozy-friend-says-911-was-a-lie...

French President Nicolas Sarkozy friend says 9/11 was a lie

One of France's most successful stand-up comedians and a close friend of President Nicolas Sarkozy has sparked outrage by becoming the latest French star to question the official account of the September 11 attacks.

By Henry Samuel in Paris

Last Updated: 6:07PM BST 09 Sep 2008

In an embarrassment to the French President, and with just two days to go before the seventh anniversary of the deadly terrorist strikes, Jean-Marie Bigard - a member of Mr Sarkozy's inner circle of showbiz friends - said the official version was a "lie".

"We are now absolutely certain that these two planes - the one that supposedly fell into a forest (flight 93 in Pennsylvania) and onto the Pentagon don't exist... those planes are still flying.

"It's an enormous lie," he told Europe 1 radio.

"It's an American missile that hit the Pentagon, they provoked it themselves, they killed fellow Americans.

"Usually one learns of these things 30 years afterwards. We know it now," he went on.

The Definitive Treatment of 9/11

The Definitive Treatment of 9/11

a review of The New Pearl Harbor Revisited, by David Ray Griffin

by Tod Fletcher

http://www.amazon.com/New-Pearl-Harbor-Revisited-Cover-Up/dp/1566567297/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1221009067&sr=1-1

In THE NEW PEARL HARBOR REVISITED, David Ray Griffin provides a brilliant and much-needed companion to his path-breaking and movement-building book on 9/11, The New Pearl Harbor (NPH; 2004). Now, on the occasion of the seventh anniversary of those horrific events, Griffin surveys in detail all the main lines of evidence against the official account of 9/11 to have emerged during the last four years. THE NEW PEARL HARBOR REVISITED (NPHR) has been designed as volume 2 of a two-volume set with NPH as volume 1; together they provide a thorough and up-to-date case against the official conspiracy theory (they can be bought separately, of course).

Magnetic forces to blame for 9/11 tower collapse?

Saw this news story

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/magnetic-forces-to-blame-for-911-tower-collapse-924509.html

Independent. co. uk
Magnetic forces to blame for 9/11 tower collapse

By Steve Connor
Wednesday, 10 September 2008

Scientists can finally explain why the Twin Towers collapsed on September 11, despite the temperature of the fires being well below the 1,500C melting point of the steel girders holding up the buildings.

The discovery that unusual magnetic forces within the girders made them weak at temperatures of about 500C explains away the conspiracy theories that have spread like wildfire since the disaster.

Sergei Dudarev, of the UK Atomic Energy Agency, found that steel loses its strength above 500C because its molecules undergo a physical transition from one state to another due to magnetic fluctuations. "The steel didn't melt, it just became soft. It is an unusual state and the temperatures in the Twin Towers were high enough to cause it because the thermal insulation was knocked off the girders through the impact with the aircraft," he said.

2008 Now or Never Tonight on True School Radio

Me, Donna from SMT Studios and Hakim from Channel Live are going on True School Radio tonight with Afrika Bambaata, Yoda, and Dr. Shaka Zula to promote the 9/12/2008 fundraiser for the first responders.

8:00 PM to 12:00 PM Eastern.

Official Website Here.

"Was America Attacked by Muslims on 9/11?" by David Ray Griffin

Original Content at http://www.opednews.com/articles/Was-America-Attacked-by-Mu-by-David-Ray-Griffin-080909-536.html

September 9, 2008

Was America Attacked by Muslims on 9/11?

By David Ray Griffin

Much of America's foreign policy since 9/11 has been based on the assumption that it was attacked by Muslims on that day. This assumption was used, most prominently, to justify the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. It is now widely agreed that the use of 9/11 as a basis for attacking Iraq was illegitimate: none of the hijackers were Iraqis, there was no working relation between Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden, and Iraq was not behind the anthrax attacks. But it is still widely believed that the US attack on Afghanistan was justified. For example, the New York Times, while referring to the US attack on Iraq as a "war of choice," calls the battle in Afghanistan a "war of necessity." Time magazine has dubbed it "the right war." And Barack Obama says that one reason to wind down our involvement in Iraq is to have the troops and resources to "go after the people in Afghanistan who actually attacked us on 9/11."

The Government as Wizard of Oz in Anthrax and 9/11 Investigations. . . "Don't Look at the Man Behind the Curtain"

http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2008/09/governments-scientific-argument-in.html

As top independent anthrax experts, physicists, engineers and architects confirm, the government makes claims in the anthrax and 9/11 investigations but does not provide the details which would allow the claims to be independently tested by scientists not affiliated with the government. At the end of the day, the government is simply begging us - like the Wizard of Oz - not to look at the man behind the curtain.

Anthrax

The government admits that Dr. Bruce Ivins passed 2 lie detector tests, that hair samples and handwriting samples don't implicate him, and that there is no direct evidence linking him to the anthrax murders.

The Debate: 9/11: The Physics

Steve Pakin is airing the following tonight on TVO.
http://www.tvo.org/cfmx/tvoorg/theagenda/index.cfm?page_id=7
It is described as "The physics of 9/11: why do the rumours live on? 9/11 Truthers, the laws of probability ... and the laws of science."
Please check ou the poll on the left side of the page.
It's currently at 56% MIHOP and 21% LIHOP.
Michael Keefer and Graeme MacQueen will be speaking for our side.

Ivins Didn't Do It

from: http://wwplanet.blogspot.com/2008/09/ivins-didnt-do-it.html

Ivins Didn't Do It

Bruce Ivins is not responsible for the 2001 anthrax letter attacks. How can I be so sure? Because the facts say he didn’t do it. Let’s examine the FBI’s “evidence” against Ivins:
Using a new process, the anthrax material has been genetically traced to the beaker (the murder weapon, as the FBI calls it) that Dr. Ivins controlled. Sounds convincing, doesn’t it? Sounds like there’s undisputable scientific evidence that points to Ivins, right? However, this new genetic tracing process has never been peer reviewed. This means it has never been objectively tested. No independent scientist has reproduced the kind of accuracy that the FBI is claiming. Beyond the FBI saying it works, there is no evidence that it does work. Had there been a trial, this vaunted genetic evidence against Ivins would have crumbled under cross-examination. With the genetic evidence gone, the link to Ivins’ lab and to the “murder weapon” beaker is gone.

9/11 Truth Civil Informationing, Sept. 7th, 2008

Sunday, Sept. 7th in Maple Ridge, B.C. (Canada)

Fraser Valley 9/11 Truth gathered in Maple Ridge again this day at our usual spot at 224th and Dewdney for more 9/11 Truth Civil Informationing with 7 members on hand.

The response was overwhelmingly positive with many, many honks and thumbs up.

While there, we were spontaneously approached by 3 members of the alternative media.

The truth of 11 September 2001 is just a rumour ! Sorry that they have not read the arguments of the 911 truth movement.

John MITCHELL
Herblay FRANCE

bonjour ,

today the French nation newspaper "Le Parisien" has done two pages on the 911 truth movement which they summerize as just a rumour.

see

http://www.leparisien.fr/faits-divers/11-septembre-pourquoi-l-absurde-rumeur-persiste-09-09-2008-208462.php
http://www.leparisien.fr/faits-divers/quand-bigard-derape-09-09-2008-208460.php
http://www.leparisien.fr/faits-divers/une-compilation-video-qui-fascine-les-internautes-09-09-2008-208463.php
http://www.leparisien.fr/abo-faits-divers/pour-les-conspirationnistes-la-verite-est-ailleurs-09-09-2008-208458.php
http://www.leparisien.fr/abo-faits-divers/aux-etats-unis-la-theorie-du-complot-perdure-09-09-2008-208457.php

The requested URL /abo-faits-divers/il-est-quasiment-impossible-de-lutter-contre-ce-phenomene-09-09-2008-208459.php was not found on this server.

I have put a copy of the text incase they are taken off the internet.

11 Septembre: pourquoi l’absurde rumeur persiste

Who the heck is Arthur Scheuerman, and why did he comment at my blog?

The following comment has been posted to my blog (repeated below). It purports to come from:

Arthur Scheuerman
Ret. Battalion Chief
FDNY

It was in response to my reposting of John Wyndham's letter to Nist at http://www.theprogressivemind.info/2008/09/dr-john-wyndhams-comments-to-nist-wtc7.html .

Who the heck is Arthur Scheuerman? Is he on the up and up? This is the internet mind you, and I could pose as the Queen of England if I wanted.

It is a very long and detailed comment on my very inconsequential blog, which I find curious. I believe that Scheuerman's claims are specious, but it would be nice to have some heavyweights weigh in with rebuttal.

I have allowed the comment to be posted on my site, The Progressive Mind, even though I suspect Scheuerman may not be everything he says that he is. See his site: http://www.blogger.com/profile/14211118872671048625 .

He has two posts on his blog, both on 9/11.

Regards
Michael Zimmer

Arthur Scheuerman has left a new comment on your post "Dr. John Wyndham's comments to NIST (WTC7) | 911bl...":

Significant New Information Details CIA Criminal Culpability In Allowing The 9/11 Attacks!

Based on what I know, this sounds legitimate. - Jon

Source: marketwatch.com

Last update: 3:18 p.m. EDT Sept. 8, 2008

WASHINGTON, Sept 08, 2008 /PRNewswire-USNewswire via COMTEX/ -- Palo Alto Publishing will hold a press conference on September 11, 2008, at 9 AM at the National Press Club at 529 14th St. NW, Washington D.C., to detail new information revealed since the release of the 9/11 Commission Report. Entirely sourced from government reports, court documents, and the account of FBI Agent Ali Soufan, this analysis, never before fully detailed, shows that CIA officers, working through liaisons at FBI Headquarters, had repeatedly and criminally obstructed investigations that could have prevented the attacks on 9/11.

Todays 'Le Parisien' (09/09/2008 ) dismisses the 9/11 truth as just 'Rumours'

John MITCHELL
Herblay FRANCE

bonjour ,

in todays Parisien nation newspaper, there is a collection of little articles on the rumour that 911 was an inside job. Obviously these writers have not read a lot of the 911 truth movement's arguments and can only discuss rumours and not facts.

Follow the links. I have included a copy of the text incase the links are taken down.

Yours

John

PS may be someone can do an internet translation. Lunch break has finished and I have to go back to work.

http://www.leparisien.fr/abo-faits-divers/pour-les-conspirationnistes-la-verite-est-ailleurs-09-09-2008-208458.php
http://www.leparisien.fr/faits-divers/11-septembre-pourquoi-l-absurde-rumeur-persiste-09-09-2008-208462.php
http://www.leparisien.fr/faits-divers/quand-bigard-derape-09-09-2008-208460.php
http://www.leparisien.fr/abo-faits-divers/aux-etats-unis-la-theorie-du-complot-perdure-09-09-2008-208457.php
http://www.leparisien.fr/faits-divers/une-compilation-video-qui-fascine-les-internautes-09-09-2008-208463.php

following link to "Il est quasiment impossible de lutter contre ce phénomème" has been blocked already ?

Memo From Cairo, 9/11 Rumors That Become Conventional Wisdom By MICHAEL SLACKMAN New York Times (!)

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/09/world/africa/09cairo.html?_r=1&th&emc=th&oref=slogin

September 9, 2008
Memo From Cairo
9/11 Rumors That Become Conventional Wisdom

By MICHAEL SLACKMAN

CAIRO — Seven years later, it remains conventional wisdom here that Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda could not have been solely responsible for the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, and that the United States and Israel had to have been involved in their planning, if not their execution, too.

This is not the conclusion of a scientific survey, but it is what routinely comes up in conversations around the region — in a shopping mall in Dubai, in a park in Algiers, in a cafe in Riyadh and all over Cairo.

“Look, I don’t believe what your governments and press say. It just can’t be true,” said Ahmed Issab, 26, a Syrian engineer who lives and works in the United Arab Emirates. “Why would they tell the truth? I think the U.S. organized this so that they had an excuse to invade Iraq for the oil.”