Blogs

Iran and 9/11: Down the Rabbit Hole of Blame by George Washington Nov 6, 2017

Iran and 9/11: Down the Rabbit Hole of Blame

by George Washington
Nov 6, 2017

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-11-06/iran-and-911-down-rabbit-hole-blame

reface: Given the new attempt to use documents (cough fake?) linking Iran and 9/11, this piece is timely indeed ...

Background here.

By Kristen Breitweiser, one of the four 9/11 widows – known as the “Jersey Girls” – instrumental in forcing the government to form the 9/11 Commission to investigate the 2001 attacks. Follow Kristen Breitweiser on Twitter: www.twitter.com/kdbreitweiser.

Largely unreported and unknown to almost everyone is the recent push to re-establish an Iranian role in the 9/11 attacks. To be more specific, some in Washington are currently trying to allege that Iran played a larger role in the 9/11 attacks than the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Why this assertion about Iran— that has been lying fallow for years—is so recently being resurrected raises questions, bears scrutiny, and begs an examination.

Zelikow : No Evidence that CIA Sought to Recruit Hijackers

 

Excerpt from latest essay by Phillip Zelikow, publish at The Cypher Brief

 

"Former senior White House counterterrorism official Richard Clarke and a former FBI agent, Mark Rossini, alleged in the History Channel program that the CIA failures to share information with the FBI appear to have been deliberate. This was because, they say, the CIA had hoped to recruit al-Mihdhar or al-Hazmi to become agency informants, a plan approved by Director of the CIA Tenet and CIA leadership. This is obviously a grave allegation.

 

The Fat Bin Laden Confession Video - ? Translation Questioned

James Corbett of the Corbett Report discusses a question about the translation of the “Fat Bin Laden Confession Video”. In his show notes, he provides links to more information about the video and the translation.

Corbett Report Episode with shownotes and links - https://www.corbettreport.com/who-is-nicholas-rockefeller-questions-for-corbett-038/
YouTube Link - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MGyrxK0pXWM&feature=youtu.be&t=25m45s
BitChute Link - 25:45 mark - https://www.bitchute.com/video/MGyrxK0pXWM/

Complete Bin Laden “confession” video (C-Span) - https://www.c-span.org/video/?167830-1/bin-laden-videotape
Higher quality clip from Bin Laden video (from Moussaoui trial) - http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution/AF00007DVD.html
Taking the fat out of the fat bin Laden confession video – pdf - http://nuke.crono911.org/Portals/0/Documenti/muckracker.pdf
Corbett Report - Interview 285 – Maher Osseiran - https://www.corbettreport.com/interview-285-maher-osseiran/

DoD Inspector General Reports For 9/11 Can't Be Trusted

“Isn't it great that all of these "reports" are coming out clearing the Pentagon of any wrong doing?” - Jon Gold, 9/22/2006

Jon Gold
9/28/2017

On 5/7/2009, New York Times columnist Frank Rich went on the Rachel Maddow show, and shared his belief that the DoD Inspector General's office's investigations over the years may have been cover-ups that were "carried out in response to "orders from above." He said that any report "over the past five or six years during the war in Iraq" may be suspect, and that "there may be a much bigger story here."

In 2006, two reports were released from the DoD Inspector General’s Office. One on 8/5/2006, and one on 9/21/2006.

NEW! Ed Asner introduces The Lawyers Committee for 9/11 Inquiry

NEW! Ed Asner introduces The Lawyers Committee for 9/11 Inquiry

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UinyVio76dY&t=323s

911TAP Feature Article-- WTC7 Evaluation

Nice, detailed elaboration of Professor Hulsey's 6 SEP Presentation, including a much improved video with pointers. This new version will open this information up to a greater audience.

https://www.911tap.org/557-news-releases/700-professor-hulsey-s-interim-report-undercuts-nist-wtc-7-study

Randi Rhodes & Paul Thompson Discuss ABC's "The Path To 9/11" - 9/12/2006

Not posting this to start an argument.

I firmly believe this is when we were our most "powerful" as a movement. We were still being ignored for the most part, the media and "debunkers" hadn't really had a chance yet to do their best to discredit us so we were still credible in MANY peoples eyes, Paul Thompson was still "the man," and a year later I wrote an article entitled "This Is Not The Controlled Demolition Movement" when we were being defined both from without and within as the movement that thinks the buildings were brought down in a "Controlled Demolition," and a "missile hit the Pentagon." Then, it was later terrorist sympathizers, holocaust denying murderers, anti-semites, and so on.

Another point can be made that "In Their Own Words: The Untold Stories Of The 9/11 Families" was released in late 2007, and that barely got any attention, both without and within the "9/11 Truth Movement."

DC 911 Truth Seekers 2017

DC 911 Truth Seekers : 16th Year Anniversary with

Richard Gage, Peter Ketchum, Barry Kissin other experts at the National Press Club Sept 11th, 2017

*Barry Kissin talk particularly moving and informative talk starts @1:13:02

CONTINUATION OF THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN TERRORIST ATTACKS

https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/09/11/notice-regarding-continuation-national-emergency-respect-certain

The White House
Office of the Press Secretary
September 11, 2017
Notice Regarding the Continuation of the National Emergency with Respect to Certain Terrorist Attacks

CONTINUATION OF THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY
WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN TERRORIST ATTACKS

Consistent with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act, 50 U.S.C. 1622(d), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency previously declared on September 14, 2001, in Proclamation 7463, with respect to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, and the continuing and immediate threat of further attacks on the United States.

Because the terrorist threat continues, the national emergency declared on September 14, 2001, and the powers and authorities adopted to deal with that emergency must continue in effect beyond September 14, 2017. Therefore, I am continuing in effect for an additional year the national emergency declared on September 14, 2001, in response to certain terrorist attacks.This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to the Congress.

President Trump Amazing Speech @ Pentagon 9/11 Ceremony (9/11/17)

President Trump Amazing Speech @ Pentagon 9/11 Ceremony (9/11/17)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tEzR4sX3HbQ

Evidence-based article in DailyMail (UK) challenges official 9/11 story

In an article published September 8, 2017 and updated the next day, the Daily Mail (UK) strongly challenges the official government narrative of 9/11/2001: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4867124/9-11-conspiracy-theories-persist-16-years-atrocity.html .

The article features Prof. David Ray Griffin's latest book: "Bush And Cheney: How They Ruined America And The World." They also reference Leroy Hulsey's excellent analysis of the official (NIST) story that fire destroyed WTC-7: "This week, eminent Alaska University engineers dismissed this explanation. Dr J. Leroy Hulsey, Chair of the university’s Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, said: ‘Fire did not and could not have caused the failure of this building.’ "

Further, they cite a British physicist, Matt Campbell, who " insists that 9/11 did not happen in the way we have been told and that there has been a huge official cover-up to disguise the truth." Quoting Dr. Campbell: "‘The BBC has presented information to the public that breaks its own editorial guidelines. In at least one documentary, it removed the sounds of huge explosions going off in WTC7 moments before its collapse.

Saudi government allegedly funded a ‘dry run’ for 9/11

http://nypost.com/2017/09/09/saudi-government-allegedly-funded-a-dry-run-for-911/

Saudi government allegedly funded a ‘dry run’ for 9/11
By Paul Sperry
September 9, 2017

Fresh evidence submitted in a major 9/11 lawsuit moving forward against the Saudi Arabian government reveals its embassy in Washington may have funded a “dry run” for the hijackings carried out by two Saudi employees, further reinforcing the claim employees and agents of the kingdom directed and aided the 9/11 hijackers and plotters.

Two years before the airliner attacks, the Saudi Embassy paid for two Saudi nationals, living undercover in the US as students, to fly from Phoenix to Washington “in a dry run for the 9/11 attacks,” alleges the amended complaint filed on behalf of the families of some 1,400 victims who died in the terrorist attacks 16 years ago.

The court filing provides new details that paint “a pattern of both financial and operational support” for the 9/11 conspiracy from official Saudi sources, lawyers for the plaintiffs say. In fact, the Saudi government may have been involved in underwriting the attacks from the earliest stages — including testing cockpit security.