[Click 'Watch Now' on the Vimeo embed to view Part 3 VOD]
"one of the most important documentaries in circulation at the moment
with relevance to the extremely dangerous drumbeat and buildup to major war"
- Joanne Leon [Shadowproof.com]
Part 3: Maintaining the World Order 3hr 32mins [ Out Now on DVD & VOD ]
"When the Berlin wall fell, our work wasn't finished". -- Victoria Nuland, November 2013
“Fuck the EU” -- Victoria Nuland, February 2014
Title: The Fugitive, His Dead Wife, and the 9/11 Conspiracy Theory That Explains Everything
The 9/11 Family Steering Committee’s Website:
9/11 Family Members Lorie Van Auken and Mindy Kleinberg’s report on how poorly the 9/11 Commission answered their questions:
A collection of statements from the September Eleventh Advocates (“Jersey Girls”) since the time of the 9/11 Commission:
They have made many more.
A full page, full color, explosive 9/11 Truth advertisement ran in the Plano Star Courier starting the week of Sunday June 26th, 2016. The dimensions of the full page ad are the typical newspaper size of approximately 10” X 21”. The ad will certainly spark Independence Day fireworks in time for a hot, North Texas 4th of July.
Prince Bandar bin Sultan of “The 28 Pages” and the UK’s Margaret Thatcher involved in “…(the UK’s) biggest, most lucrative arms deal in history….”
~~~ The United Kingdom’s largest ever export contract and largest ever arms deal. ~~~
(Larger image) - http://photos2.meetupstatic.com/photos/event/3/c/2/d/highres_451335405.jpeg
UK’s Daily Express Covers the
WTC 7 Evaluation Study
Yesterday morning we woke up to the great news that one of Britain’s largest newspapers had just published a story on WTC 7 Evaluation. This computer modeling study of World Trade Center Building 7’s collapse is being conducted by engineers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) and is being sponsored by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth). You can check out the article here.
The Daily Express receives an average of 1.3 million visitors each day and has a daily print circulation of 400,000. Although the article starts off with the customary kneejerk sensationalism, it quickly turns to neutrally reporting on the unbiased research being done by UAF’s Dr. Leroy Hulsey into how and why WTC 7 fell.
A number of individuals who worked in key positions apparently knew that the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center were going to collapse before the two buildings came down on September 11, 2001. These men talked with colleagues about their concern that the towers might come down, and some of them issued stark warnings about the danger and ordered people to get away from the World Trade Center.
Although their warnings have, in some cases, been credited with saving lives, the behavior of these men is, on closer examination, surprising and quite suspicious. This is because the general opinion before September 11 was that the Twin Towers would survive being hit by planes and the outcomes of previous high-rise fires should have led the men to think the towers would easily endure the fires they suffered on September 11 without collapsing.
There were so many warnings, and so many indications that this Government knew attacks were coming. We need access to Bush's PDBs among a multitude of other things.
(Larger Image)- http://photos1.meetupstatic.com/photos/event/e/7/7/9/highres_451199257.jpeg
(15 Minute Video Link)
Facebook Theatre - https://www.facebook.com/ae911truth/videos/vb.59185411268/10153493868176269/?type=2&theater
Ae911Truth Campaigns Newsletter Archive (link which will activate the video) - http://us1.campaign-archive2.com/?u=d03bf3ffcac549c7dc7888ef5&id=fd75bb3369&e=[UNIQID]
Ae911truth – Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/ae911truth/
AE911Truth (@AE911Truth) | Twitter https://twitter.com/AE911Truth
Ae911Truth.org – http://www.ae911truth.org/
Ae911Truth.org Older Version Website Evidence - http://www1.ae911truth.org/en/evidence.html
Market Watch - June 14, 2016
...with link to Gallup Poll
...As Gallup’s Jim Norman explains: “Americans clearly lack confidence in the institutions that affect their daily lives: the schools responsible for educating the nation’s children; the houses of worship that are expected to provide spiritual guidance; the banks that are supposed to protect Americans’ earnings; the U.S. Congress elected to represent the nation’s interests; and the news media that claims it exists to keep them informed.”...
...Congress actually earned the “ignominious” distinction of being the only institution sparking little or no confidence in a majority of Americans in the poll....
In 1971, Muhammad Ali Helped Undermine the FBI’s Illegal Spying on Americans
by Betty Medsger - June 6, 2016 in "The Intercept"
Since his death a few days ago, countless tributes to Muhammad Ali have brought to life the memories of his extraordinary accomplishments inside and outside boxing. But one thing has gotten little attention: Ali provided cover for a burglary that changed history.
It was March 8, 1971, the night of Ali’s first fight with Joe Frazier, and the noise from that epic battle provided cover for the break-in of an FBI office in Media, Pennsylvania. The burglary, by eight activists who stole every file in the office, revealed the illegal spying operations that FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover had organized against a broad swath of Americans, including Martin Luther King Jr. The revelations led to congressional investigations and major reforms of all intelligence agencies.
Excerpts from a couple speeches that George W. Bush gave in the two months following 9/11, juxtaposed with some of what we've since heard about the 28 pages from former Senator Bob Graham, 9/11 victims' family members and a number of Congressmen.
Presumption of a Cover-Up …
Judges and lawyers know that – if someone intentionally destroys evidence – he’s probably trying to hide his crime. American law has long recognized that destruction of evidence raises a presumption of guilt for the person who destroyed the evidence.
So what does it mean when the US government intentionally destroyed massive amounts of evidence related to 9/11?
Judge and Prosecutor Destroy Evidence
For example, it was revealed last week that the judge overseeing the trial of surviving 9/11 suspects conspired with the prosecution to destroy evidence relevant to a key suspect’s defense. And see this.
(The Defense Department has also farmed out most of the work of both prosecuting and defending the surviving 9/11 suspects to the same private company. And the heads of the military tribunal prosecuting the 9/11 suspects said that the trials must be rigged so that there are no acquittals.)
Destruction of Videotapes
The CIA videotaped the interrogation of 9/11 suspects, falsely told the 9/11 Commission that there were no videotapes or other records of the interrogations, and then illegally destroyed all of the tapes and transcripts of the interrogations.
9/11 Commission co-chairs Thomas Keane and Lee Hamilton wrote:
Those who knew about those videotapes — and did not tell us about them — obstructed our investigation.
So far, 2016 is proving to be the year the September 11th attacks have been blown wide open. But when the U.S. Government is involved, it’s one step forward, then two steps back.
For the first time since that fateful September day, a once oblivious populace has begun to question why the US invaded Iraq in spite of the fact that 15 of the 19 alleged hijackers were from Saudi Arabia.
Then, in an April episode of 60-Minutes, former Florida governor, Democratic U.S. Senator and onetime chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, Bob Graham implicated a US ally for their role in the September 11th attacks.
“I think it’s implausible to believe that 19 people, most of whom didn’t speak English, most of whom had never been in the United States before, many didn’t have a high school education, could have carried out such a complicated task without some support from within the United States,” said Graham in the interview, implicating Saudi Arabia for their role in 9/11.