CB_Brooklyn's blog

The BTS database [Flights 11 (WTC 1) and 77 (Pentagon) Did NOT Exist]

06 December 2006


The BTS database

When I described the BTS database as having been fixed that wasn’t totally accurate.
It has been altered, but not enough to provide the evidence necessary to show that these flights ever existed.
When the database was examined in 2003 it contained no record whatsoever of either flight11 or flight 77.
That database has been backed up, as it was envisaged that it would be altered.
Then ten months later it was found that the flights had been added to the database as scheduled, but that there was no flight data for them.
And the tail numbers have not been added.
The flight data is recorded in real time as the planes fly, and would be almost as difficult to fake as pictures of stars from the moon, for similar reasons of complexity.
“No flight data” shows that the planes never flew.
The summary statistics for the day were also not altered to include these flights.
So even after the database has been altered, it still provides ABSOLUTE PROOF that Both AA flights 11 and 77 never flew that day.
That is:
According to the database, the flights didn’t take off.
http://www.bts.gov/programs/airline_information/airline_ontime_statistics/
So any individual who says that those flights flew is going directly against the evidence of the BTS database!
So how does the hijacking story fit in with that?

 

[Comment from CB_Brooklyn: 11 and 77 are numbers used in numerology. See here]

Exploding the Airliner Crash Myth (By Morgan Reynolds and Rick Rajter)

Excerpt below. Click here for full paper.
Exploding the Airliner Crash Myth
By Morgan Reynolds and Rick Rajter - October 27, 2006
I. Introduction
Newtonian laws of motion combined with physical evidence prove no Boeing airliners crashed on September 11, 2001 at any of the four designated sites. The government's story is a provable, gigantic lie although various possibilities remain open about what really happened.
From a narrow prosecutorial point of view, we already have enough evidence to prove guilt at the top. The 9/11 hoax was a stunning psychological operation (psy-op), the most audacious and murderous false-flag operation in history, well-planned, deceptive at every level, intended to manipulate public opinion, and wildly successful in the short run.

9/11 TV-Fakery... Hunt the Boeing (WTC) 2: Pythagoras Exposes Phantom Flight UA175 as a Hoax (Analysis by StillDiggin)

Thursday, October 26, 2006

9/11 TV-Fakery... Hunt the Boeing (WTC) 2: Pythagoras Exposes Phantom Flight UA175 as a Hoax

Introduction

It appears that the newer source of the "Jim Friedl" audio has more to offer than meets the ear. In this newly released video, we are presented with an uninterrupted “live” video feed, which provides us with a reverse version of the magic trick "Now you see it... Now you don't."

At 7:38 of this video, the feed is switched to a different helicopter. A few seconds later, FOX commentator Jim Ryan describes the image from the video feed as "the picture from our chopper now arriving at the scene." This comment seems to validate that this is indeed the same video that was broadcast “live” by WNYW FOX5 on 9/11/01, since the picture correlates with the commentary. In what I referred to in my previous article as the "original source," the video feed never switches to this helicopter (this would have occurred approximately 2:44 into that video).

Although this matching commentary does not necessarily prove that this newly released video is exactly what was broadcast “live” by WNYW FOX5 on 9/11/01, it does seem to prove that this is the feed that Jim Ryan was looking at as he was commentating
Continued here...

Did The Digital Plane Image Decelerate At WTC 2? (Paper by Rick Rajter)

Rick came to MIT as an undergraduat in Materials Science and Engineering. Rick graduated from MIT with a bachelors in 2003 and is now in the Ph.D program at MIT.

DID THE DIGITAL PLANE IMAGE DECELERATE AT WTC 2?
By Rick Rajter - October 26, 2006
One of the major oddities of all WTC2 videos is the apparent lack of plane deceleration from many of the observed camera angles. The plane seems to fly in effortlessly, but then comes to a complete stop while inside (apparently violating conservation of momentum and energy). To the layman, these two conservation laws mean we should expect TWO major sources of slowdown when one object penetrates another:
• Energy is lost via dissipation as the intruding object breaks and destroys the impacted area into smaller pieces
• Energy is transferred to the broken pieces in the form of kinetic energy or gained velocity.

Was Thermite used to Cleanup Ground Zero After the Collapses?

The following information is from Dr Judy Wood

(I did minor rewording)

Also see her new paper updated Oct 23

 

 

A Challenge To All Who Believe Real Boeings Hit the WTC

A CHALLENGE
TO ANYONE BELIEVING THESE VIDEOS SHOW A
REAL PLANE HITTING THE SOUTH TOWER
I think this could benefit us all!
1. Go down to your local college/university.
2. Find a physics/engineering professor you can trust. (A real one, with a PhD)
3. Show him/her the slow-motion videos here (or better yet, show straight from the CNN DVD)
4. Ask the professor flat out: "Is that a real plane?"
5. Ask the professor to explain the answer scientifically, and list the laws of physics that would apply.
6. Post your results here.
7. Let others with the nohow evaluate it.
8. If any errors are found, make a second trip to the professor ask him/her to explain the errors.
9. Post your results here!
==============================
Former Mechanical Engineering Professor Dr Judy Wood and former Aerospace Engineer Joseph Keith both say the videos violate the laws of physics. If you don't trust them, then get someone who you do trust.
Getting answers from multiple professionals will help us all. Find people you can trust! They should follow the laws of science and nothing else. If they do, all responses should be identical. If you want, tell them that you'll post their answers on this website, but will keep them anonymous. (Perhaps you can post the name of the univerisity.)

The Bush Family History

Seeing the following quote on RawStory prompted me to make this blog.

"Just 34% of Americans say that they support the war; 70% of women opposed."

Sixteen percent of America believe Bush is telling the truth about 9/11, but 34% still support the Iraqi war? The torture taking place there is unimaginable.

 

The information below may help put in context, what is going on:

 

The 9/11 Attacks Were Predicted in a 1990s Card Game (For Real)

Education is the Key to Learning What's Going On!
Here are two cards from the Steve Jackson Games
1995 card game...

Thoughts on How to Respond When asked "Why hasn't one media outlet covered the evidence?" (Excellent for MSM spots)

RE: Recent appearance on FOX News

When asked "Why hasn't one media outlet covered the evidence?"

Respond something like this...

 


The media is hiding the truth of 9/11 and I can prove it:

 

  1. This past May, a national Zogby poll revealed that half of the country wants a new investigation into 9/11. Why didn't the media report this? When half the country wants a new investigation into the biggest terrorist attack in its history, all the news channels should have had breaking-news flashing on the screen. Why didn't they? Is Michael Jackson and runaway brides more important?
  2. The family members of victims held a press conference on September 11, 2006 at the National Press Club in Washington DC demanding a new investigation into the attacks of September 11th. The mainstream media failed to report this. Why? Doesn't the media side with the victims' families?
  3. At Ground Zero on this past 9/11 anniversary were 3000 people wearing black t-shirts reading "investigate 9/11". Where was your coverage on that?

 

Dr Judy Wood issues update on paper

Why Indeed did the WTC Buildings Disintegrate?

A peer-review of Steven E. Jones' 9/11 Research

by Morgan Reynolds and Judy Wood

 

Added several images, further proving that molten aluminum does not retain a silvery color when elevated to higher temperatures. This contradicts Professor Steven Jones' research, which makes the (false) assumption that aluminum would be silvery at ~1500° C simply because it's silvery at ~600° C.

Some Evidence of Planted Plane Wreckage @ WTC Site

 

 

 

 

 

Source: "We Have Holes" by Dr Morgan Reyolds, March 2006

Highly recommended reading

Is the Media REALLY Involved in the 9/11 Attacks?

Is the Media REALLY Involved in the 9/11 Attacks?

 

 

It is the duty of the press and TV networks to report the news to the public. It is their job, their responsibility.

 

What does it tell us when certain stories are withheld? What does it tell us when CNN/FOX/et al report on nothing but Michael Jackson, Scott Peterson, Terri Schiavo, and runaway brides, for hours on end? Surely there are more important issues to discuss. What are they hiding?

 

The mainstream media are part of the 9/11 cover-up and therefore complicit in the attacks. If they weren’t, they would have reported on this May 2006 Zogby poll revealing that about half of America wants a new investigation, including the investigation of government officials for possible involvement.

The Growth of the 9/11 Truth Movement

911Blogger.com Stats

September 2005 - September 2006

Source of Data 

 

Definition of a Disinfo Agent

A disinfo agent can be described as someone who...

 

  • discourages others from looking at information
  • encourages others to make assumptions instead of examining evidence

These people are causing great harm to the Truth Movement and are a very bad influence to newbies.

What Energy Source Can Convert Concrete and Steel into Dust?

What Pulverized the South Tower's Concrete to Ultra-Fine Powder?

 

 

Was it a Nuclear Explosion, like this test in the Nevada Desert?

 

What Turned the North Tower's Spire into Steel Dust?

 

Here's a CNN Video of the spire AND what looks like the entire steel core turning to DUST!

http://st12.startlogic.com/%7exenonpup/spire/spire_collapse_from_north.avi

RSS