CB_Brooklyn's blog

North Tower Strike Pictures -- Something "Fishy"

What's wrong with these? They don't look right




[dz: this thread has been locked. users who wish to argue further over this subject matter are welcome to find a forum to do so on. users who continue to use this site only as a method to argue over personal opinions will find their posts removed, and will be banned.]

Former Military Analyst Daniel Ellsberg says U.S. "slipping towards a police state"

Prominent whisteblower

Daniel Ellsberg
Former American Military Analyst Employed by the RAND Corporation
Well Known for Leaking the “Pentagon Papers” During Vietnam War

"…we’re slipping toward, uh, in the direction of a police state, without a lot of resistance, which is what happened in Germany…"

Interviewer: “…have you had a chance to look at a lot of this information coming from America’s leading scholars, physicists, engineers, etc. who have taken a look now at 9-11 and are now not only questioning what might have happened on 9-11, but really being very direct…”

Ellsberg: “I have looked at a lot of that and I tell you, without going into it all, which would take a lot of time, I find some of it very implausible and other parts of it, quite solid. There’s no question in my mind, that there is enough evidence there to justify a very comprehensive and hard hitting investigation of a kind that we have not seen, with subpoenas, and general questioning of people, and release of a lot of documents. There’s no question that, uh… put it this way, that very serious questions have been raised about how much they knew beforehand and how much involvement there may have been. Is the administration capable, uh, humanly and psychologically, of engineering such a provocation? Yes. I would say that, I worked for such an administration myself... Johnson. President Johnson put destroyers in harm’s way in the Tonkin Gulf, not only once, but several times, with a lot of his people hoping that that would lead to a confrontation, and claiming that it had, and could have resulted in the loss of many lives in the course of it...”

My Theory on the 9/11 Truth Movement's Future

My opinion...


1. News of Steven Jones on paid leave and his thermate findings go MSM

2. Millions and millions of Americans contact the media, the government, and BYU demanding that Jones be allowed to release his so-called evidence

3. Jones' evidence is released

4. Jones is then completely discredited by the MSM based on:

  • thermate findings ("arson investigation") not collected in a manner admissible in a court of law (i.e. no proof of authenticity)
  • his paper is reviewed by hundreds of thousands of scientists and found to be inaccurate and deceitful

5. Next false flag attack in the US, as per Ray McGovern's and Alex Jones' predictions

6. Government blames and attacks Iran

7. Martial Law declared in the US

Why Indeed did the WTC Buildings Disintegrate? (Reynolds/Wood)

Why Indeed did the WTC Buildings


The Trouble with Steven E. Jones' 9/11 Research
by Morgan Reynolds and Judy Wood*



a few excerpts:

Jones neglects laws of physics and physical evidence regarding impossible WTC big plane crashes in favor of curt dismissal of the no-big-boeing-theory (NBB). He relies on "soft" evidence like videos, eyewitnesses, planted evidence and unverified black boxes. When others challenge how aluminum wide-body Boeings can fly through steel-concrete walls, floors and core without losing a part, Jones does not turn to physics for refutation but continues to cite eyewitnesses and videos, thereby backing the OGCT.

Important Information on Steven Jones' Research

As a former major supporter of Steven Jones I must convey the following


Steven Jones spends much of his time on molten metal, in particular the molten metal dripping from the South Tower. Using a picture from the NIST report, he determines the color of the molten metal in order to gauge the temperature. However, the NIST report states that the “intensity levels” of the picture were adjusted. This information was placed at the bottom of the picture, but for some reason Jones removed it.


Why did Jones use a picture that had its intensity level adjusted to determine the color or something?

Why did he hide the fact that the levels were adjusted?

Was the dripping molten metal really there? Notice that the windows switch.



Whether wide-body jets were used is unimportant. CGI Fakery is Already Fact

Just like controlled demolitions, CGI is already fact given that...

an aluminum airplane will not slice through 100s of feet of structural steel and reinforced concrete, not show any signs of crushing, breaking, bending, and have it's delicate nose pop out the otherside. And on top of that, not have an exit hole in the building.

Also, different flight paths prove TV Fakery as well.

People must know that this technology exists and is in the hands of TV Networks, and that improvements are being made all the time.

Any news, even live news, from Iraq could all be fake!


Quotes from a Founding member of S.P.I.N.E., and retired Software Engineer in the Aerospace Industry:


"The video is phony because airliners don’t meld into steel and concrete buildings, they crash against them!"

Open Letter To Paul Joseph Watson (regarding your article on infowars.com)

in regards to this article


Mr Watson:

I ask that you follow Alex Jones' advice and look at the data.

You claim the fuselage of flight 175 poked through the opposite side of the south tower. If so, where is the exit hole? An exit hole is not visible in any of the photographs.

What you see on the film footage is a CGI fuselage, a "special effect".


This video shows what happens when an F4 slams into a concrete wall at 500MPH. Note that F4s are built to much higher standards than wide-body aircraft, and are designed to fly 1500MPH. You'll see the F4 pulverizes into dust.


What happens on 9/11? The flimsy wide-body "airplane" penetrates the structural steel / concrete building just as it glides through the air! Wing tips don't break off, tail doesn't bend, the "plane" doesn't even change direction. It shows no change at all.

Update on our Debate with Steven E. Jones (Reynolds / Wood)

Morgan Reynolds and Judy Wood — August 29, 2006
Printer friendly copy of this article available here.

Update on our Debate with Steven E. Jones

To our fans and opponents: Our critical review of the 9/11 work of Steven E. Jones appeared the evening of August 23. We understand that he responded on August 25, but we were not notified. We discovered it on the PhysOrg forum on August 27 and we replied to it on August 27. We posted our response and sent Jones the link. After posting our response, we learned that Jones had changed the file he had posted. So, it appears that to respond to whatever he posts is like aiming at a moving target.
Jones’ response has appeared at st911.org but not our original article nor ourreply. Only one side of the debate is represented at the Scholars’ site. Can there be better evidence of what Scholars’ "Truth" is really about?
It looks like Jones intends to issue a string of rebuttals over the next XX weeks. Once we judge that he has dribbled the bulk of his replies out, we will scoop them up and put them under the microscope and refute them.
In the meantime, we urge interested parties to consult our original critique since it contains a great deal of 9/11 analysis, including some original findings, in the context of knocking down Jones’ errors. Our original article and our reply to Jones’ August 27 response are key to uncovering the bogus nature of Jones’ work.

Paperless Electronic Voting Machines Must Be Stopped

Shocking election-theft testimony


Vote-rigging software written for Republican...


Computer programmer Clinton Eugene Curtis testifies under oath before the U.S. House Judiciary Members in Ohio (back in 2004)


Article / Video




The Presidential Election Special Edition

(Election Fraud)

(Google Video)

News Footage From Iraq, Afghanistan, etc. Could All Be Fake

The fake "War on Terror" is being driven by public opinion it seems. Whenever the mainstream media televises their propaganda events from the Middle East, Americans seem to stand behind it.

We have no proof that any of these "videos" are of real events...


People need to understand that ANY video - EVEN LIVE VIDEO - can be fake. This article from Technology Review explains all the details about realtime, live, on-the-fly video manipulation, deleting/editing/inserting prerecorded footage into live feed as it's happening.


Former High Level Government Insiders Speak Up About 9/11

Former High Level Government Insiders Speak Up About 9/11


...a list of many former insiders speaking up, along with specific quotes, mp3/video links, and articles.


Take a look


A good way of waking up newspapers - let's them know who's speaking up!

If ANY Real Airliners Were Used On 9/11, Where Are The Parts' Serial Numbers?

This article explains...


Aircraft Parts as a Clue to their Identity by George Nelson Colonel, USAF (ret.)



Notable Quotes:

"It will soon be five years since the tragic events of 9/11/01 unfolded, and still the general public has seen no physical evidence that should have been collected at each of the four crash sites, (a routine requirement during mandatory investigations of each and every major aircraft crash.) The National Transportation Safety Board has announced on its website that responsibility for the investigations and reports have been assigned to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, but there is no indication that mandatory investigations were ever conducted or that the reports of any investigations have been written."

Here is a REAL Airplane Crash @ 500MPH (Video Link)

Here's a video of a controlled crash to demonstrate how fragile planes really are: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1556575484235720126&q=airplane+crash&hl=en South Tower super slow-mo for comparison: http://webfairy.911review.org/video/ghostplane2.wmv



Picture of North Tower (formerly mislabled as South Tower) "plane" impact. Notice the right wing tip? Aluminum through structural steel???





South Tower:


Educate Military Families on No Iraq-9/11 Connection GWB Quote

We should take advantage of this. How about a campaign to inform military bases, families, etc that Bush has admitted NO connection between Iraq and 9/11?