911blogger.com seeks to cover a broad spectrum of news. Blog posts are the responsibility of the poster. Readers are encouraged to check the facts, debate, and form their own conclusions.
Chris Sarns's blog
12-31-09 revised 7-12-10
Summary and Analysis of "National Security Alert" by Chris Sarns
Like many others I was impressed with the Citizen Investigation Team (CIT) video "National Security Alert" (NSA) when I saw it for the first time. I thought that the unanimous testimony of the witnesses confirmed the north flight path of American Airlines flight 77, but I could not see how that in any way proved their "flyover theory". I did not give the "flyover" theory much thought because it seemed to be a minor point. As it turns out, the strong evidence for the north flight path was just the "hook", and "flyover" was actually their main point.
From the OpEd article:
Independent Investigation into Pentagon Attack Yields Alarming Information, Garners Wide-Ranging Endorsements
"The eyewitnesses in all of the most critical vantage points, on the other hand, independently, unanimously, and unequivocally report a drastically different flight path, proving that the plane absolutely could not have hit the light poles or the building."
The underlined part of this statement is not true.
At 14:37 in this video, P4T establishes the north flight path into the Pentagon is aerodynamically possible.
The witnesses prove the light poles were staged but they do not prove the plane did not hit the Pentagon.
You be the judge.
These photos were taken minutes after the impact, before the fire trucks arrived.
Full size images at:
(Note: This dates from July of 2008. It wasn't circulated very well, that's for sure. -rep.)
Local Chico, California CBS station airs piece on the Truth movement.
They actually presented it as news in a non-judgmental, journalistic manner. They also showed three views of the collapse of WTC 7. They get it! They showed it!
This needs to go viral. So far, it's only had 368 views. People should be encouraged to send the URL for this video or a copy to their local TV stations.
Obama has already stated himself that waterboarding is torture. Bush and Cheney have now both admitted to authorizing waterboarding. So it MUST be prosecuted.
CALL THE DEMOCRATIC SENATORS ON THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE TO COMMIT
ERIC HOLDER TO ENFORCING THE LAW FOR PAST BUSH CRIMES
We are all one with and inseparable from God, and each other.
Stand By Me
NIST left out key words in a statement about shear studs so they could falsely claim that there were no studs on the key girder between columns 79 and 44.
This is critical to their collapse theory.
NIST L pg 6 [10 on pg counter]
Most of the beams and girders were made composite with the slabs through the use of shear studs. Typically, the shear studs were 0.75 in. in diameter by 5 in. long, spaced 1 ft to 2 ft on center. Studs were not indicated on the design drawings for many of the core girders.
NCSTAR 1-9 vol.1 pg 15 
Most of the beams were made composite with the slabs through the use of shear studs. Typically, the shear studs were 0.75 in. in diameter by 5 in. long, spaced 2 ft on center. Studs were not indicated on the design drawings for the girders.
NCSTAR 1A pg 49 
Shyam Sunder describes in the NIST technical briefing and the slide show/document titled;
NIST Response to the World Trade Center Disaster Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster August 26, 2008
states on page 32: “Forces from thermal expansion failed the connection at Column 79, then pushed the girder off the seat.” [to the west]
In NCSTAR 1-9 Vol.1 page 353 [397 on pg counter] it says:
“Axial compression then increased in the floor beams, and at a beam temperature of 436 °C, the northmost beam began to buckle laterally. Buckling of other floor beams followed as shown in Figure 8–27 (a), leading to collapse of the floor system, and rocking of the girder off its seat at Column 79 as shown in Figure 8–27 [to the east]
Dylan Avery posed the question "Who writes this stuff?"
I can't say for sure but the evidence seems to point to one of the founding fathers.
Note text at 0:30
The fire on floor 12 is critical to the NIST hypothesis because the collapse of floor 13 in the north east corner of the building is supposedly the beginning of the initiating event that led to the implosion of WTC 7.
On page 383 of NIST NCSTAR 1-9 volume 1, the fire simulation graphic of floor 12 shows the fire conveniently burning around column 79 and then coming back to it at 5:00 p.m. The NIST fire simulation is not consistent with the photographs of the fire. The photographs show, and the NIST Appendix L report states, the fire on floor 12 had burned out by 4:45 p.m. In fact, it had burned out in the east end before 4:00 p.m.
Therefore, the fire did not cause floor 13 to collapse at 5:20 p.m. and the implosion of WTC 7 did not occur as NIST has proposed.
Below is a link to a composite graphic that compares the NIST graphic with a more realistic representation of the progression of the fires on floor 12.
A professional version of this graphic will be published soon.
World Trade Center Building 7 Adviser
Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth
BBC was not the only network to 'get it wrong'.
John Conyers and two staffers met for over an hour with two members of Code Pink and discussed activism and impeachment, including Congressman Robert Wexler's proposal to begin impeachment hearings on Cheney.
He hinted he could be swayed by a convincing argument, leaning out of his chair for dramatic effect.
Wexler's call for hearings to start is having an effect.
The more signatures, the greater the effect.
Please join the call.
229,734 have signed on so far.
Support the NYC 9/11 Ballot Initiative
NY State Green Party
Code Pink NYC
David Ray Griffin
Paul Craig Roberts
`We know they have biological and chemical weapons.'
March 17, 2002, Press Conference
and we know they are pursuing nuclear weapons.'
March 19, 2002, Press Briefing
`And he is actively pursuing nuclear weapons at this time . . .'
March 24, 2002, CNN Late Edition interview with Vice President Cheney.
`We know he's got chemicals and biological and we know he's working on nuclear.'
May 19, 2002, NBC Meet the Press interview with Vice President Cheney.
`But we now know that Saddam has resumed his efforts to acquire nuclear weapons . . . Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction. There is no doubt that he is amassing them to use against our friends, against our allies, and against us.'
August 26, 2002, Speech of Vice President Cheney at VFW 103rd National Convention.
Thursday, October 7, 2004
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Saddam Hussein did not possess stockpiles of illicit weapons at the time of the U.S. invasion in March 2003 and had not begun any program to produce them, a CIA report concludes.
April 23, 2006
The 7th Floor slab consisted of 5 in. of 3,500 psi normal weight concrete on top of 3 in., 18 gage
composite metal deck, for a total thickness of 8 in. The slab was reinforced with #5 rebars at 6 in. oncenter
in both directions. Regions of the slab on the south side of the building had 8 in. of formed
concrete without any metal deck. In these regions two layers of steel reinforcing were provided (see
• H2.7 Collapse Progresses: The horizontal tensile force would tend to pull the line of
columns 74, 71, 68, 65, and 62 towards the east.
*The general absence of the Floor 7 slab*
and braced frames around the center core column line, due to the presence of elevators shafts,
creates a more likely scenario for the simultaneous lateral displacement of the center core
columns without similarly displacing other core columns. The possible result is a failure of
all the columns at their splices, as shown in Fig. L–49.
2) Sky Marshalls & the "No Fly List"
A year or so after Sky Marshall's were placed back on airplanes because of 9/11, there was an article in the NorthCounty Times Newspaper and on local TV News Channels about Sky Marshall's being required to turn in names of people on the flights to their Homeland District Supervisors of people they "Thought" could be a future "Flight Risk."
> These names were then placed on the "No Fly List." It was pointed out that District Supervisors made it an"Unofficial Requirement" that all Sky Marshall's under them were to turn in at least one persons name per flight or loose promotions & pay increases, (I think Los Vegas District Office was the only one to "mistakenly" put it in writing to their Sky Marshall's, and had to retract it after it became known to the newspapers that this practice existed).