<-a><-i><-p><-div>

A Preview Chapter For The Upcoming Book "We Were Lied To About 9/11: The Interviews"


Hello. I am currently working on another book called "We Were Lied To About 9/11: The Interviews." Each interview has already been transcribed, and I am in the process of editing them now. When I started this project I never realized how important it would actually be. I've already posted so many quotes from the parts of the book I've worked on. I'm not tooting my own horn, I'm not saying this for ego purposes, I'm not bullshitting anyone. This book will simply blow people's minds.

Here is a preview Chapter. It's the second interview that I did with Mickey Huff of ProjectCensored. I'm sharing this one because the "news" has been the biggest obstacle towards getting truth, accountability and justice for what happened.

http://occupyyourself.org/download/docs/911/mickeypreview.pdf

I would think the book would be done by June, but I could be wrong.

Enjoy.

New 9/11 Timeline Entries: White House on September 11, Actions of Pentagon Officials, Flight 93 Passengers' Revolt, and More

From the History Commons Groups blog:

A large number of entries have been added to the Complete 9/11 Timeline at History Commons, the majority of which provide new details about the events of September 11, 2001.

WHITE HOUSE STAFFERS WERE PREPARING FOR THE CONGRESSIONAL PICNIC

The Indifference and Inaction of Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz During the 9/11 Attacks

Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz had a crucial role to play in the military's response to the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, and yet he did nothing to help protect his country until the attacks were over and it was too late for him to make a difference to the outcome of the crisis.

As the second-highest-ranking official in the Department of Defense, Wolfowitz surely had critical duties to perform and should have promptly taken action when America came under attack. Furthermore, since he was at the Pentagon when the attacks occurred, he was in a good location to help the military respond to them. And yet he appears to have reacted to the catastrophic events with indifference.

Why Did the Top Army Officer in the U.S. Do So Little in Response to the 9/11 Attacks?

General Jack Keane

General John M. "Jack" Keane was the most senior Army officer in the United States on September 11, 2001. Working at the Pentagon, he was ideally placed to respond promptly and effectively to the terrorist attacks that day. And yet he appears to have done alarmingly little while the attacks were underway.

The only action he has recalled taking after learning about the crashes at the World Trade Center was ordering that the Army Operations Center (AOC) at the Pentagon be brought up to full manning. He apparently did not order the activation of the Army's Crisis Action Team (CAT), even though this was designed for dealing with emergencies like the one taking place at the time.

Accused Vegas Shooter's Doctor A DHS Employee; Is Division Leader of NV Emergency Response Agency

The physician who last June prescribed accused Las Vegas shooter Stephen Paddock Diazepam (a drug used to make some more hypno-suggestible or "hypnotizable" and induce amnesia) [1][2], is Dr. Steven P. Winkler of Las Vegas, NV. Winkler is the Chief Medical Officer of Nevada-1 DMAT (Disaster Medical Assistance Team)[3]. DMATs operate under the direction of the Department of Homeland Security and Winkler is thus what is known as an intermittent federal employee and also serves on a number of professional committees. [4] NV-1 DMAT is also a division of Nevada's Clark County Emergency Management agency who just prior to the October 1, 2017 Las Vegas mass shooting, hosted at least one multi-agency mock-mass casualty terrorism response exercise in Las Vegas. [5][6] CIA code named “MK-ULTRA” "mind control" programs experimented heavily with amnesia inducing hypnosis, facilitated by certain drugs like Diazepam. [7]

DoD Inspector General Reports For 9/11 Can't Be Trusted

“Isn't it great that all of these "reports" are coming out clearing the Pentagon of any wrong doing?” - Jon Gold, 9/22/2006

Jon Gold
9/28/2017

On 5/7/2009, New York Times columnist Frank Rich went on the Rachel Maddow show, and shared his belief that the DoD Inspector General's office's investigations over the years may have been cover-ups that were "carried out in response to "orders from above." He said that any report "over the past five or six years during the war in Iraq" may be suspect, and that "there may be a much bigger story here."

In 2006, two reports were released from the DoD Inspector General’s Office. One on 8/5/2006, and one on 9/21/2006.

9/11: The Pentagon’s B-Movie

By Graeme MacQueen.

The events that took place in the United States on September 11, 2001 were real and they were extremely violent. As David Griffin has recently shown in detail, they also had catastrophic real-life consequences for both the United States and the world. [1]

But these events were also deeply filmic (like a film) and they were presented to us through a narrative we now know to be fictional. This “9/11 movie” reveals itself to careful investigators as scripted, directed and produced by the U.S. national security state. The movie does not represent the real world. It violates the rules operative in the real world, including the laws of physics. Audiences will remain in thrall to the spectacle and violence of the War on Terror only as long as they remain mesmerized by the B-movie of 9/11.

Please see the full article at the Centre for Research on Globalization:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/911-the-pentagons-b-movie/5606573