this first link is from conspiracyplanet.com.. if you don't like the source go straight to researching the article.. its a good listing of new things learned about 9/11 in 2004:
http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=75&contentid=1757

here is a transcript of an interview with a man named Russel L. Wittenberg.. a highly decorated pilot, engineer, instructor, and dispatcher.. his interview focuses on flight 77 and the terrorist pilots:
http://letsroll911.org/ipw-web/bulletin/bb/viewtopic.php?t=4565

well, i must say im a bit dissapointed at the lack of new 9/11 news the last few weeks.. there is tons of recent 9/11 news that the mainstream media could cover, but they havent, so its not like its really necessary to have new stories every week.. there is plenty to give probable cause for a real investigation, but anyways..

i got my hands on a new video of the collapse of WTC7 today.. its the best quality i have seen of the footage.. watch this video, and ask yourself if a solid steel building could liquify like we see, and ask yourself if bending or breaking steel would cause the puffs of smoke seen along the edge in this video:

came across this image from here:
http://www.septembereleventh.org/bellingham/index.php

-----

well, while i wish this report wasnt so one sided, it does at least show the zogby report about new yorkers thinking a real 9/11 investigation must happen, and it isnt as negative as past reports of 9/11 'conspiracy theories'..

you know whats so messed up? this could easily be phrased as '9/11 deserves more answers'.. there are MASSIVE holes in the official report by the commission.. it doesnt address anything except providing lip-service for the administration.. no physical research, no black boxes recovered (even though rescue workers DID find them), no physical research at all.. despite incredible evidence, first hand accounts, whistleblower information, etc. etc. that could shed more light on the best that is 9/11..