(For a historical archive of our old site visit http://911blogger.com/archive)
well, rumsfeld had a slip of the tongue.. alot of people will just write it off.. obviously he just made a mistake.. i would argue his mistake was telling the truth..
I think all of us have a sense if we imagine the kind of world we would face if the people who bombed the mess hall in Mosul, or the people who did the bombing in Spain, or the people who attacked the United States in New York, shot down the plane over Pennsylvania and attacked the Pentagon, the people who cut off peoples' heads on television to intimidate, to frighten â€“ indeed the word 'terrorized' is just that. Its purpose is to terrorize, to alter behavior, to make people be something other than that which they want to be.
well, i must say im a bit dissapointed at the lack of new 9/11 news the last few weeks.. there is tons of recent 9/11 news that the mainstream media could cover, but they havent, so its not like its really necessary to have new stories every week.. there is plenty to give probable cause for a real investigation, but anyways..
i got my hands on a new video of the collapse of WTC7 today.. its the best quality i have seen of the footage.. watch this video, and ask yourself if a solid steel building could liquify like we see, and ask yourself if bending or breaking steel would cause the puffs of smoke seen along the edge in this video:
here is an article from congressman Ron Paul of texas.. its an interesting story that is exactly what you wouldn't expect from a congressman:
much respect goes to someone like this congressman who can speak out against the majority of his colleagues.
came across this image from here:
well, while i wish this report wasnt so one sided, it does at least show the zogby report about new yorkers thinking a real 9/11 investigation must happen, and it isnt as negative as past reports of 9/11 'conspiracy theories'..
you know whats so messed up? this could easily be phrased as '9/11 deserves more answers'.. there are MASSIVE holes in the official report by the commission.. it doesnt address anything except providing lip-service for the administration.. no physical research, no black boxes recovered (even though rescue workers DID find them), no physical research at all.. despite incredible evidence, first hand accounts, whistleblower information, etc. etc. that could shed more light on the best that is 9/11..
here is a scathing article about how 9/11 has become the official seal of the government to get anything it wants accomplished:
But it remains doubtful that the White House will course correct on another tact, the practice of treating 9/11 like a brand name, a tool for selling ideas, selling a party, selling initiatives â€” even selling people. One blemished icon, or even two, is not is going to end what has proved a winning strategy, certainly good enough for first place with American voters in November.
here is a video clip addendum from 'painful deceptions' in which senator mark dayton talks about the failures of the 'independent' commission:
also, here is another good research site: