Complete 911 Timeline: Military exercises up to 9/11
Paul Thompson has updated his 9/11 timeline. His newest update is about 9/11 related military exercises. This update provides extensive coverage of events prior to 9/11 involving aircraft being used as weapons as well as the wargames of 9/11.

Between 1991 and 2001: NORAD Exercise Simulates Crash into Famous US Building (WTC)
..
Between October 24 and 28, 2000: Military Holds Exercise Rehearsing Response to a Plane Crash at the Pentagon

Conspiracy Theories and the Fight for Truth

Remember the "Jersey Girls?" That's a phrase we haven't heard in a while, a reference to several New Jersey-based widows who lost their husbands in the attack on the World Trade Center on 9/11. They were ordinary apolitical suburbanites, mostly with Republican leanings, who did an extraordinary thing in questioning the Administration's version of the attack and demanding that their government do so as well.
..
Its now been a year since that Commission finally led by former Republican New Jersey Governor Thomas Kean, and co-chaired by former Democratic Congressman Lee Hamilton, published its best-selling and novel-like report offering up an official conspiracy theory naming the Osama bin Laden run Al Qaeda as the solo perpetrators.

Unanswered Questions of 9/11
This is a very lengthy article covering a bunch of different topics, here is a listing:

• 9/11 Pre-Warnings by Jessica Frioland
• The Building 7 Collapse Mystery By Josh Parrish
• Concerns About Flight 77 and the Pentagon By Bridget Thornton
• Rumors of Israeli Involvement in 9/11 By Brooke Finley
• Unanswered Questions about the Put-options and 9/11 By Ambrosia Pardue
• The 9/11 War Games By Rebekah Cohen
• Atta and the $100,000 By Rebekah Cohen and Ambrosia Pardue
• Some 9/11 Terrorists Still Alive? And Other Troubling Inaccuracies By Chris Kyle
• The Democratic Party, Like The Republican Party and The Media, Covered Up The Deep Complicity In The 9/11/01 Attack By Bush-Cheney-Rumsfeld-Myers By John B. Massen, Guest Writer — Summary Analysis

They Are Not “Conspiracy Theories” - They Are, in Fact, “Discoveries”

There seems to be no set criteria for dismissing information as a foolish conspiracy theory. The only prerequisite for information to be so categorize seems to be the desire to reject it. The reason for the rejection does not seem to matter. It appears that anything people do not want to believe is simply set aside as not believable.
..
It's time to put an end to this nonsense once and for all. It's also time dispense with the name calling and understand the dynamics of what is happening when new information is rejected. We have to deal with the resistance to any tampering with accepted "truths." And we have to find ways to convince people to seriously consider the new information, new discoveries if you will - that so many refuse, under any circumstances, to acknowledge.