(For a historical archive of our old site visit http://911blogger.com/archive)
Researchers and investigators have uncovered links between a Miami bank that collapsed in 2002 amid a fraud scandal that was highlighted by billions of dollars in questionable cash and fraudulent loans and money movements linked to the Bush family and businesses linked to funding pilot training for the 9-11 hijackers.
Now defunct Hamilton Bank: Interesting clients
As previously reported by WMR last July (Intelligence Whispers), "In 1995, a $10 million transfer was made to Houston. The source was the Saudi Royal family. The funds were transferred to Nations Bank via Banca Svizzera Italiana via SWIFT. On September 28, 1995, a $50,000 check was cashed at Nation's Bank of Pasadena, Texas. It allegedly originated from the $10 million of transferred funds from Saudi Arabia and the payee was "Fayyaz Ahmed." Fayyaz Ahmed, aka Fayez Ahmad, was also named as one of the hijackers aboard United 175 that crashed into the South Tower of the World Trade Center
You know what would have prevented 9/11 from happening? If Norad came to work that day. If Standard Operating Procedures were followed, 9/11 could not have possibly happened. But lets not investigate any of that, instead, lets start illegal wars of aggression and spy on Americans to prevent the next one...
As the Senate prepares for a showdown vote to reauthorize the Patriot Act, members of the World's Greatest Deliberative Body should deliberate on this: Had it existed, could the Patriot Act have prevented the Sept. 11 massacre?
More information on all of these events available here: http://www.communitycurrency.org/events.html.
What: 9/11- Truth, Stolen Elections and Beyond: What's going on in our country and what can we do about it? A three part multimedia series presented by Ken Jenkins
When: Three Wednesdays: January 25, February 1, February 8th
Where: Harmony Community Room
400G Morris St.
(across from Coaches Corner Health Club)
Cost: $10 - No one turned away due to lack of funds RSVP = email@example.com
Scholars claim government's account violates laws of physics and engineering.
UPDATE: Please vote in this poll "Is This an Impressive Group of People?": http://www.dailykos.com/view_poll
(PRWEB) January 27, 2006 -- An influential group of prominent experts and scholars have joined together alleging that senior government officials have covered up crucial facts about what really happened on 9/11. The members of this new non-partisan association, "Scholars for 9/11 Truth" (S9/11T), are convinced their research proves the current administration has been dishonest with the nation about events in New York and Washington, D.C.
While site changes here may seem sporadic at times, we continue to apsire to being the best 9/11 related news blog on the web. In reaching this goal we are dependent on the suggestions and submissions of our users.
A large majority of the links and upcoming events on the right panel, as well as a good percentage of our posts, come from suggestions from our viewers. Our abilities to be useful to the 9/11 community comes through contributions to our website in a few different forms, but primarily through suggestions and feedback.
The sites we have listed on the right panel were originally compiled in April 2005. Since then we have added a lot of 9/11 related links which have been sent in from our visitors. If you have other 9/11 related site links you would like us to add please send them in via our contact links on the left panel.
Letters: Bush failed to act on pre-9/11 warnings - The Sheboygan Press
The latest assertion by the Bush administration is that if they had had the wire-tap capabilities before 9/11 that they've recently been exposed of using (i.e. illegal), they could very well have prevented the terrorist attacks. As one recent writer to The Sheboygan Press expressed, thousands of our fellow Americans would have been spared.
This current lie manufactured by Bush and Co. would be hilarious if not so tragic. The non-partisan 9/11 Commission published the facts surrounding the weeks and months leading up to the attacks on 9/11.
Locals challenge 9/11 in film - The Daily Star
"Loose Change," a controversial film on the events of 9/11, will be shown Friday night as part of an independent film festival at Hartwick College.
Written and directed by Dylan Avery of Oneonta and produced by Korey Rowe of Oneonta, "Loose Change" challenges official explanations of how the World Trade Center collapsed and the Pentagon was damaged on that fateful day.
"What you will see inside," they say, "will prove without a shadow of doubt that everything you know about 9/11 is a complete fabrication."
"It is not merely the opinion of the editorial writer, or of the columnist, which is protected by the First Amendment. It is the free flow of information so that the public will be informed about the Government and its actions." - Murray Gurfein, former U.S. district judge, 1971.
The time is long overdue to make information available to the public that questions the official government story of the events surrounding 9/11/01. To that end, an organization called Citizens For 9/11 Truth will be presenting videos on that topic. The first showing will be on Saturday, Feb. 4, at 1 p.m. in the basement of the Glenwood Springs Library, 413 Ninth St. [Gleenwood Springs, CO] It is free and open to the public (and not sponsored by the library).
During his January 25 speech at the headquarters of the National Security Agency (NSA), President Bush repeated the debunked claim -- previously articulated by Vice President Dick Cheney and Gen. Michael V. Hayden, a deputy director for national intelligence and former head of the NSA -- that had the Bush administration's warrantless domestic spying program been in place before the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the NSA might have identified some of the hijackers in the United States. When several media outlets uncritically reported this claim -- as advanced by Hayden -- Media Matters for America noted that the 9-11 Commission and congressional investigators reportedly reached a very different conclusion: that the Bush administration had information on two of the 9-11 hijackers well over a year before the attacks occurred, and it was primarily bureaucratic problems -- rather than a lack of information -- that were responsible for the security breakdown.