(For a historical archive of our old site visit http://911blogger.com/archive)
Regarding the explosive Andrew Grove audio we posted here:
A transcript is now available in M$ Word format here:
04-25-06 PROJECT CONSTELLATION MESSAGE MANUSCRIPT_WITH FINAL CHANGES.doc
Update: Some were having trouble with the MS Word format, it is now available in PDF format here: http://www.freewebs.com/abigsecret/Grove.html
From the Loose Change forum here:
we've spoken with the naudets.
everything is being worked out.
to our enemies: sorry, turn those smiles upside down
to our friends: told ya.
btw, not everyhing is a conspiracy, guys. the naudets had an exclusive agreement with the firefighters to not release the footage to ANYONE, they only allowed the first plane strike to be licensed out to people.
therefore, i was treading on the firefighters and their families toes', not just the naudets.
The latest audio tape attributed to Osama bin Laden appears to be one more installment in a succession of evidence fabricated by the US government to deceive the American people, according to Scholars for 9/11 Truth. "This tape is only the latest in a series of fabrications intended to mislead the American people," said James H. Fetzer, the society's founder. "The closer we get to revealing the truth about 9/11, the more furiously the government fights to conceal it!" He said members of Scholars and other experts had detected evidence of fakery.
Canada's "Maclean's" magazine posted a cautionary article about those pesky 9/11 truthseekers, the Scholars for 9/11 Truth in the May 15th, 2006 issue.
The article is now viewable online; "Hijacking the Truth on 9/11"
Framed as a hit piece by the magazine editor, (the online version doesn't even extend the courtesy of a hyperlink to ST911), the writer, Jonathon Gatehouse still manages to allow some of the alternative theories to see the light of day.
Read it and form your own conclusions, and of course, write the editor(s);
Have questions about the official 9/11 conspiracy theory? Come to â€œ9/11 Revealing the Truth, Reclaiming Our Future,â€ the international educational and strategy conference, on June 2-4 at Embassy Suites Hotel, Rosemont.
The 9/11 truth movement has gained enormous credibility and momentum in 2006. It offers the greatest opportunity in modern history for courageous, ethical people to positively influence the future of humanity.
THE LASTEST alleged bin Laden tape raises even more questions regarding the "official version" of 9/11.
Why would bin Laden wait until immediately after Moussaoui's sentencing to proclaim his innocence? Why do we never hear anything regarding the actual process by which these tapes are authenticated?
Are we to accept the word of the same intelligence authorities who assured us of the presence of WMDs in Iraq? Perhaps the tapes should be analyzed by independent experts before expecting the repeatedly duped American population to accept these findings at face value.
10 AM Pacific (1 PM Eastern) time.
For more information, The Meria Heller Show
The Sept. 11 Commission Report Omissions and Distortions, by David Ray Griffin.
Thanks to Bozo for this find.
FYI, Some speculation in this article. Thanks to FHB for this submission.
The scenarios that played out on the morning of Sept 11, 2001, in military preparedness terms is very suspect, to put it mildly. And should not have happened AT ALL!!! This is what we train for and for those three planes to have gone off course the way that they did without ANY alarms going off and nobody responding is ridiculous!!! You will notice that I said three instead of four planes for good reason. The type of damage and debris area that was shown at the Pentagon could not, in anyones wildest fantasies, been caused by a jumbo jetliner. But I will cover that later.
The Democratic Party, Like The Republican Party and The Media, Covered Up The Deep Complicity In The 9/11/01 Attack By Bush-Cheney-Rumsfeld-Myers
By John B. Massen, Guest Writer -- Summary Analysis
On March 11, 2003, Congressman John Conyers, Ranking Member of the House Judiciary Committee, called an emergency meeting of 40+ top advisors, mostly lawyers, to discuss immediately initiating impeachment against Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Ashcroft, to head off the impending war against Iraq, which began eight days later. Also invited were Francis A. Boyle, professor of law at University of Illinois School of Law, and Ramsey Clark, former U.S. Attorney General, both of whom had drafted Bills of Impeachment, to argue the case for impeachment. The meeting ended with a second revised draft Bill of Impeachment, because eminent lawyers believed that Bush et al deserved impeachment for multiple violations of international treaties and laws. However, influential Democrats opposed impeachment on the ground that the effort would hurt their party's interest in gaining control of the federal government in the 2004 election.