(For a historical archive of our old site visit http://911blogger.com/archive)
To promote our cause we are offering a free v911t Bumper Sticker when you join.
Anyone can join; we have 2 kinds of members, Veterans and non-veteran Auxiliary, so anyone can join, vet and non-vet alike. Join us today in our fight for Truth, and Justice.
Resist. Fight. Win. Never Quit,
Randi Rhodes has questions. Lots and lots of questions! Yesterday, she dedicated a significant part of her show examining the various anomalies surrounding the Pentagon hit, Hani Hanjour's wicked awesome flying skills, the lack of NORAD response and had several clips from recent media coverage.
She invited her listeners to take a hard look at the "5 frames" and assess what they saw. She spent a solid hour of Air America prime time radio raising the questions that so many of us have had.
Drop by her Message Board and say thanks!
Also, drop Paul Thompson a dime or two, I do believe that Randi relies on his incredible timeline quite a bit: Cooperative Research
In a segment broadcast on BBC2's "Newsnight", reporter Mark Urban presents Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton and Dave Von Kleist on the recently released Pentagon sequence.
Look for the "Pentagon 9/11 Theories" link under the "Newsnight Player" section at the Newsnight main page (straight link to the video doesn't seem to work consistently):
Fitton and Urban seem to have made up their minds that the video cinches the official story. Von Kleist remains defiant.
...an anonymous White House source told her in July 2001 that an NSA intelligence report predicted a large al Qaeda attack, possibly on the continental United States
'I think everybody knew that an attack was coming -- everyone who followed this.'"
We have received word from numerous different sources that CNN is trying to bait 9/11 truth activists to appear as guests on its programs and attack Charlie Sheen.
WTC survivor and truth activist William Rodriguez was contacted by the Anderson Cooper show and asked if he would go on record as saying the new Pentagon footage dispelled all 9/11 questions. They also requested that he attack Charlie Sheen's public stance on 9/11.
Wow, what a week, please continue spreading the word. People are talking about it, no better time than the present to promote the Truth.
Here is a little ammunition for you, thanks to everyone for their submissions:
Mirrored at 911podcasts here:
Got this email from Weldon today
Thank you for your continued interest regarding Able Danger - the Department of Defense planning effort prior to 9/11 tasked to identify and target the linkages and relationships of Al-Qaeda worldwide.
While the hearing held on Able Danger by the House Armed Services Strategic Forces and Terrorism, Unconventional Threats and Capabilities Subcommittees last February marked progress, the matter is far from resolved.
The Department of Defense Inspector General (DOD-IG) continues its investigation into allegations that the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) impugned the career of LTC Shaffer shortly after coming forward to the 9/11 Commission and the American Public with information about Able Danger and its work. In the next week, I will be following up with the DOD-IG on the status of the investigation and where it is headed as well as the link analysis chart that has been discovered. I will be asking the IG about the chart, its origin and why it has not been made public.
Here are some excerpts:
Question 1 â€” How many World Trade Center skyscrapers 40 floors and taller fell on 9/11?
Question 2 â€” What evidence do we have left over from the collapsed towers?
Question 4 â€” Approximately how many steel framed towers have collapsed due to fires before and after 9/11?
Question 6 â€” According to government reports, what is the PRIMARY cause of the WTC towers' collapses?
A couple of things about this clip, first of all, it is the fairest coverage I have seen. Second of all, they are talking about the newly released footage, and yet only show the 5 frames that were released|leaked years ago:
Also, they call this segment either Revisiting 9/11 or 9/11 Revisited. What do you think people will get when they Google: September 11 Revisited? This could work in our favor.