August 2006

(For a historical archive of our old site visit http://911blogger.com/archive)

How do you get search engines to find your page?

My site's been up a while and still I can't find it using any of the major search engines.

I know that they trawl through links they find on web pages to find new pages, but I've got http://www.911faq.org in various places now and still it does not exist :]

Anyone know if there's a minimum number of links required for a search engine to index your page?

Egos

There are several people within the movement who have TREMENDOUS egos. I have even referred to myself as an "Evil Genius". However, I am a VERY sarcastic individual, and OFTEN take part in jokes at my expense.

The reason I'm writing this is to remind everyone with egos of the following:

No ONE person has made a difference. It has been a COLLABORATIVE effort by people all over the world.

People like Dr. David Ray Griffin, Michael Ruppert, Paul Thompson, Dylan Avery, Carol Brouillet, etc... are all heroes. Each and every one of them.

However, how many people would have heard of their books, and videos, etc... if not for the 9/11 Truth Movement? How many mainstream media outlets have you seen post stories about their books? How many local stations have you seen post stories about their books? Think about how often in your daily life you see mention of anything related to 9/11 Truth. I can tell you it's not very much.

So my sincerest thanks to everyone in the movement. If not for us, the truth would have died.

Those of you with egos, please try to remember that.

Professor's 9/11 theories outrage NH leaders

Good, because these "leaders" unwillingness to do anything about this particular situation has outraged all of us for years. Another professor comes forward, follow the link to the article where you will have an opportunity to submit feedback.

http://tinyurl.com/lghto

A tenured professor of psychology at the University of New Hampshire believes an "elite" group within the federal government orchestrated the September 11th attacks on America.

William Woodward has already raised that possibility in his classroom and later this year hopes to teach a class that would explore Sept. 11th "in psychological terms -- terms like belief, conspiracy, fear, truth, courage, group dynamics."

He may not get the chance. Several state leaders yesterday criticized Woodward for bringing the radical theories into the classroom.
...

Thanks to Steve/FHB for sending this in.

Jones Replies to Reynolds and Wood

And once again, a 9/11 Activist and Investigator has to take time away from investigating and exposing the true perpetrators in order to respond to attacks.

Download a 500K preliminary report by Steven Jones in MS Word format here:

http://www.911podcasts.com/files/documents/JonesReplytoReynolds-Wood.doc

A notable quote from this document:

I could go on, but the fact is that as editor of the Journalof911Studies.com, I have invited Morgan Reynolds and whoever he wishes to join him, and another author to write papers on BOTH sides of this issue – did REAL planes hit the Twin WTC Towers, or not? Both sides agreed. In this way, readers will have two peer-reviewed scholarly papers side by side, both confronting the evidences presented above and whatever other evidences they wish to bring in – and then the reader can judge for himself or herself. And that is MUCH better than ad hominem arguments – it is the way of modern science.

I couldn't agree more. Thanks to PhrankM for sending this in.

9/11 Bloglines (08/27)

9/11 Bloglines (08/27)
http://www.bloglines.com/blog/ewing2001

Professor William Woodward's 9/11 theories outrage NH leaders (NH Union Leader)
Powerhouse Collection of 9-11 Controlled Demolition Quotes
OwntheNWO at 911blogger rants at '911hoax' posting: TV networks aired fake video of animated, CGI planes
At 911blogger: Suspicions about Prof. Jones grow...
TerrorStorm Texas Premiere a Huge Success!
Updates on LC broadcasts on Dutch TV
Delver's blog claims: "9/11 Eyewitness" is disinfo
FMNN: Moseley retracts...
Junk scientist Mark Bilk rants back again...
LC possibly premieres on History Channel Australia
Wood/Zebuhr: Strange Coincidence

[dz: updated to remove mischaracterization of OwntheNWO's statements as was changed in the original source for this post]

god whoever this is over at the history channel forum is killing us with garbage like this

http://boards.historychannel.com/thread.jspa?threadID=800013594&tstart=0&mod=1156549162488

I want to slap this F*cking idiot

" no planes struck the WTC
Posted: Aug 24, 2006 7:11 AM (1 of 11)

* Click to reply to this Reply to Topic
* Report

Around mid-2002 the case for controlled demolition of the WTC was essentially proven in the minds of many in the 911 truth movement. It was about this time that a small group of researchers discovered an even more remarkable facet of 9/11. Specifically, the shocking realization that the TV networks aired fake video of animated, CGI planes striking the WTC.

I was the first person to declare that the TV networks aired fake video. Since those early days many people have joined in support of this conclusion. At the moment, the question of whether real Boeing 767s struck the WTC is the hottest topic in the 911 Truth Movement. This is the area of research that is most promising for reaching the general public.

TerrorStorm Texas Premiere a Huge Success!

marquee

Around 800 of Alex Jones and Jim Marrs' closest friends filled the Dallas Lakewood Theater to near capacity on the evening of August 26, 2006, for the Texas Premiere of "TerrorStorm" and to hear Jim Marrs speak.

The crowd was diverse; many races, many different political stripes, and people of all ages were in attendance. Jones opened up the evening with a stirring 30 minute speech, putting the "elite" on notice; people are educating themselves about the existence of state sponsored terror as a political tool, and they're not going to take it anymore.

Despite the serious nature of TerrorStorm, the crowd was positive, receptive to Jones' message, and the audience gave the film a rousing ovation at its conclusion.

Following the premiere of the final cut of TerrorStorm, Jim Marrs gave a nearly 1 hour speech, talking about his research into 9/11, and how aspects of the assassination of JFK parallel the events of 9/11. Chief among them, the destruction/disappearing of evidence from the crime scene which covered the trail of the villians, as well as competent authorities not being allowed to examine the evidence that did exist.

Globe and Mail "reviews" Towers of Deception

Martin Levin, writing in the Books section of the Globe and Mail yesterday (page D13), trashes Towers of Deception and says some of the "more important" books on 9/11 will be "reviewed at length" in coming weeks.

Levin misrepresents Zwicker's argument, claiming, for example, that Zwicker says Noam Chomsky "is part of the plot," without explaining what he means by that. Levin writes:

"Now I have little trouble believing it possible that plutocrats of the Bush-Cheney-Rumsfeld axis of ego are orchestrating things for their own benefit and that of their Fortune 500 cronies. Or that the war in Iraq is based on an unsavoury stew of misconceptions, stupidity, wishful thinking and deceit. But what I do have difficulty believing is that the 'perpetrators' are intelligent enough and, I suppose, quite evil enough, not only to concoct such a grand strategy, but to carry it off so deviously that only Zwicker and his allies can discern its true nature. I have just as hard a time believing that this sometimes entertainingly obsessive screed has proved anything at all."

"Only Zwicker and his allies"? You mean the 100 million Americans, 20 million Canadians, and countless millions of foreigners who believe the US government did it?

RSS