April 2007

(For a historical archive of our old site visit http://911blogger.com/archive)

Possible Disinfo Alert

On Monday February 12, 2007, a man by the name of Paul Laffoley was interviewed by Mike Hagan on the radio program radioOrbit, broadcast on Columbia, Missouri's KOPN. (Download 16mb MP3 here).

Laffoley makes a number of remarkable claims. The first one is that he was tasked to design a host of interior elements for floors 15 through 45 in Tower II while he was employed at Emery Roth & Sons in Manhattan, during 1963-1964. This, despite the fact that Laffoley has no degree in Architecture, and was kicked out of the Harvard Graduate School of Design, sans Degree.

I think it's highly unlikely that one of the oldest and most prestigious architectural firms in the world, responsible for more buildings than any other architect in Manhattan, would find any need to hire a Grad-school reject as a designer on one of the tallest skyscrapers on the planet, especially considering that at the time, the WTC's design was on the cutting edge. It's more likely that he was getting coffee for an Art Director or keeping tables clean for the Architects.*

Anyhow, he goes on;

"I began to see some things going on there, that were kind of dangerous. Like, they were eliminating asbestos flocking, because they wanted to fast-track it. Meaning, they wanted to design and build simultaneously." - (36:50 mark.)

Sure "they" were. Pretty easy claim to make. A claim that makes experiments like shooting asbestos covered steel with a shotgun kind of redundant, no? The shock from the jet-crash didn't knock the asbestos off, there was no asbestos! How convenient.

"They started doing things like instead of welding steel together, they bolted it. And it turns out that those are some of the reasons why it came down..." - (39:33 mark.)

It doesn't take too much browsing time to find pictures of welders welding steel together during the construction of the WTC. The welding even extended to the floor pans:

Scientists Debunk 9/11 Myths

Here's the original

This essay is written to draw in people who don't know that many credible scientists believe the trade centers were demolished. It SOUNDS like its going to attack controlled demolition, but the theory which the scientists debunk is actually the GOVERNMENT's myth.

Numerous credible scientists have recently disproven some of the most commonly-held theories about the collapse of the World Trade Centers on September 11, 2001:

A prominent physicist with 33 years of service for the Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, DC, said that the official theory for why the Twin Towers and World Trade Center building 7 collapsed "does not match the available facts" and supports the theory that the buildings were brought down by controlled demolition

How to Become a Dictator in 6 Easy Steps

http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2006/05/how-to-become-dictator-in-6-easy-steps.html

Updated in light of a new article in the Guardian newspaper.

Here's how to become a dictator in 6 easy steps:

1) Scare the people with false flag attacks, exaggerated threats of foreign and domestic enemies, etc.

2) Present yourself, the would-be dictator, as a strong leader who will protect the people. Specifically, have your political and media lackies set you up as the "Great Leader". You must then "reluctantly" agree to save the country, since you have been "called" by God and the people to do so

Proof of Controlled Demolition with Richard Gage, part 3 Questions & Answers. April 20, 2007

Architect, Richard Gage explores the flawed conclusions of the 911 Commission report and the conclusions of NIST, in this new presentation on evidence supporting controlled demolition for World Trade 1, 2 and 7.

Newly produced architectural blueprints of the north tower augment Richard's analysis. ae911truth.org

Produced by John Parulis of brightpathvideo

The presentation at Sonoma State University, Project Censored, is divided in 3 parts, this is part 3, question & answers

William Rodriguez Hits the Mainstream

Email from Kevin Barrett of Mujca.

William Rodriguez's real story - the story of the explosions he witnessed that day - was never reported in the US mainstream media...until now.

Thanks to the dozens of people who kicked in with time, energy and money to bring William Rodriguez on his first Midwest speaking tour, William is now on the record, in the US mainstream media, describing the explosions he witnessed while performing heroic rescue work on September 11th, 2001.

http://www.leadertelegram.com/story.asp?id=82015
http://www.weau.com/news/headlines
http://www.weau.com/news13noonand5/headlines/743082.html
http://badgerherald.com/news/2007/04/23/trade_center_custodi.php
http://www.dailycardinal.com/news/world-trade-center-custodian-tells-heroic-9-11-rescue-tale.html
http://www.pjstar.com/stories/042307/TRI_BD10AM9S.060.php

Proof of Controlled Demolition, part 2 Richard Gage, AIA

Architect, Richard Gage explores the flawed conclusions of the 911 Commission report and the conclusions of NIST, in this new presentation on evidence supporting controlled demolition for World Trade 1, 2 and 7.

Newly produced architectural blueprints of the north tower augment Richard's analysis. ae911truth.org

Produced by John Parulis of brightpathvideo

The presentation at Sonoma State Univ, Project Censored, is divided in 3 parts, this is part 2

Only 3 percent of Pakistanis believe al Qaeda was behind 9/11

But the poll found uncertainty about whether al Qaeda was responsible for the September 11 attacks on the United States in 2001. Some 20 percent believed the U.S. government was behind the attacks.

"On average less than one in four believes al Qaeda was responsible for September 11th attacks. Pakistanis are the most skeptical -- only 3 percent think al Qaeda did it," said WorldPublicOpinion.org.

"There is no consensus about who is responsible for the attacks on New York and Washington; the most common answer is 'don't know'."

Full article

Where Were the F-15s on 9/11?

September 11, 2001 was an extraordinary day for many reasons. It was a day when hijackers who were amateur pilots and had never before flown jet planes suddenly gained remarkable flying skills. It was a day when scientific laws apparently changed, so that relatively small fires supposedly could cause three massive skyscrapers to disintegrate into dust, each in the space of just a few seconds. And it was also a day when two F-15s appear to have made possibly the slowest journey by military fighter jets in all history.

Democrats: Bush in denial on Iraq war

Democrats: Bush in denial on Iraq war

True, so do something about it.
Also, you Democrats and Republicans are all in total denial about 9/11. The official story cannot be true as stated, and this fact is more than obvious. Next time someone asks you a question about 9/11, do not claim that you "have never looked at the evidence" or you "never heard anything like that before" or "send me the info and I'll get right on it." It's over 5 1/2 years now and if you are still not informed about that day and the controversy surrounding the absurd gov't explanation of it, you better "get on it" real fast because the tide has turned. ABN
_________________

Apr 23, 2007, 22:11 GMT

Washington - US President George W Bush is in a 'state of denial' about the war in Iraq, a top Democratic lawmaker said Monday, as Congress headed for a showdown with the White House over war spending.

http://americanbuddhist.net/node/5596

Us Capt. slips up about 911 bombings?

Us Capt. slips up about 911 bombings? This is another great slip regarding 911!!

The 911 REcommisson Report
http://www.911wasrigged.com