jBBC`s SNAFU reporting in detail wtc7`s collapse 23 minutes early censored at youtube

 BBC, 911 Truth, BBC Error ! Huge smoking gun of pre-knowledge collapse of WTC7, 9/11 truth censorship,

 recently this message was sent to my inbox at youtube,

it is part of an ongoing effort of 911 truth minded people who return to the videos comments section perodically of a highly popular you tube video of jane stanley discussing ,live,the collapse of the salomon bros bldg while she stands live with said building [wtc7] clearly doing just fine right behind her head! OOPS!

Source: washingtonpost.com

Sunday, April 22, 2007; Page Y03

There's a simple principle underlying "Buying the War," said television journalist Bill Moyers:

Be skeptical.

"People should read and watch the news with a raised eyebrow," said Moyers, a writer, executive editor and narrator of the 90-minute documentary about U.S. media coverage of claims and information leading to the invasion of Iraq in March 2003.

The "phenomenon of terrorism" and the events of Sept. 11, 2001, shaped press coverage, he said. The film notes: "As the administration organized to strike back at the terrorists, there was little tolerance for critical scrutiny from journalists."

Clips from sources as varied as presidential news conferences, network newscasts and "The Oprah Winfrey Show" illustrate how issues leading up to the war were covered.

I was a little bored so i made the following image. It was inspired by someone here at 9/11 Blogger who made similar comments.

Today, "a federal appellate court has decided that it was not "conscience-shocking" for the head of the Environmental Protection Agency to have reassured New Yorkers that the air near ground zero was safe following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, even if the air was toxic."

The "panel of three judges reasoned that the government's interest in returning New York to normalcy following the attacks should protect it from lawsuits alleging that the government made false statements about air quality."

It was reported that "the court did not make any factual finding as to the quality of the air, or as to whether the EPA had intentionally misled the public."

I have news for the court. Some of us have made "factual findings" as to how our heroes have been treated. The court should be ASHAMED of itself.

Here's a message from John Feal about this:

"The justice system was served a black eye by our courts. Their ruling to let this woman walk away from any responsibility is a gross mis-conduct of their powers. When our judiciary process lets us down, where else are we to turn? It truely is a sad day to be a proud american and proud responder to 9/11. To the residents of Manhattan, the victims of 9/11, their families, and to the responder community, I apologize for those who feel they dont have to." - Jon