April 2007

(For a historical archive of our old site visit http://911blogger.com/archive)

Piece of Mind

Piece of Mind

As citizens and media consumers, we are embedded and embroiled in a battle for our minds.

When we actively tune into television news or other programming, read the major newspapers, seek out alternative media, play video games, watch a movie, or browse the Internet, we are subject to the influences, overtly and covertly, of people, organizations and ideologies which remain hidden to us.

There is also increasing evidence that we are subject to having our thoughts and mental processes surveilled and affected, even passively, beyond our choice or recognition.

This six-part series will examine the news media, propaganda, social agenda setting, the influences of corporations, the Pentagon, the CIA and related organizations, in driving not only what you perceive but also how you perceive it, what you think you understand, and perhaps how you will behave in a given socio-political context.

Several cases studies will be presented.

Numerous articles and other sources will be noted.

In some cases, this effort is focused on the masses… reaching tens of millions of people at once, or repetitively.

Rare Flight 93 footage

Many of you have probably already seen this, but this is rare news footage of flight 93, where the news station clearly talks about the 3-4 mile debris field.

Call to Action

This was sent in by Richard:

WE ALL NEED TO BE CALLING PELOSI, AND OUR RESPECTIVE CONGRESSMEN TO DEMAND THEY GET ON BOARD WITH KUCINICH'S ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT. MENTION ONE OF THE REASONS AS BEING TREASON FOR CRIMES COMMITTED ON SEPTEMBER 11TH, 2001.

PLEASE, FORWARD THIS EMAIL ALONG.

PEACE.

House Speaker Pelosi's office is taking calls voting for Impeachment of Bush/Cheney at 202-225-0100.

Folks, each of you who have been wanting Impeachment, need to commit right now to ask at least 10 others to call and ask each person to commit to asking 10 others to call and so on. It needs to happen fast and NOW. Let's BLITZKREIG the Speaker's office with demands for Impeachment of Bush AND Cheney.

Thanks.

2. From David Swanson:

Kucinich Has Introduced Articles of Impeachment Against Vice President Richard Cheney

Congressman Dennis Kucinich has acted. Here are his Articles of Impeachment and supporting materials.

It's time now for us to follow through by asking the rest of Congress to get on board with the American public, and by letting the media know where we stand.

http://www.impeachcheney.org

Bill Moyers Journal BUYING THE WAR watch online

Bill Moyers Journal BUYING THE WAR watch online

Bill Moyers Journal
BUYING THE WAR

Watch online:

http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/btw/watch.html

"9/11"" 9/!! 9/!!"

Censorship by the media- even in "live" transmissions

I've just read that Rosie O'Donell's show "The View" was normally pre-taped and then broadcasted with a few days delay, but occasionally it was really live.

***

One of the primary reasons why O'Donnell rejected ABC's contract offer was because the show's Neo-Con producer, Bill Geddie, was continually editing her statements and censoring what could be broadcast. The View is normally pre-taped and aired the next day but occasionally on Tuesdays or Thursdays the broadcast goes out live. Sources tell us that O'Donnell would choose the live show to make statements about 9/11, but that after the initial furore, Geddie even resorted to inserting a delay between the recording and the transmission so that he could live edit controversial statements he didn't like.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2007/260407toldrosie.htm

***

This delay can be only a few seconds to some minutes, and usually we may not even notice. As the show still may be announced as "live".

And who brought us this?
Right, it was "Nipplegate", Janet Jacksons "shocking" showing of her "naked" breast.

http://www.answers.com/topic/super-bowl-xxxviii-halftime-show-controvers...

Fascist America, in 10 easy steps

Here is an excellent analysis of fascism in general compared to the situation in the US today.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,,2064157,00.html

But: Unfortunately Naomi stopped short of suggesting that 911 was false flag terror, even if she explains the exploitation of false flags throughout history and the concept of creating terror myths. Maybe it was because of the editor of the Guardian, a left gate keeper instance so far.

Here's the most important issue:

***

Creating a terrifying threat - hydra-like, secretive, evil - is an old trick. It can, like Hitler's invocation of a communist threat to the nation's security, be based on actual events (one Wisconsin academic has faced calls for his dismissal because he noted, among other things, that the alleged communist arson, the Reichstag fire of February 1933, was swiftly followed in Nazi Germany by passage of the Enabling Act, which replaced constitutional law with an open-ended state of emergency). Or the terrifying threat can be based, like the National Socialist evocation of the "global conspiracy of world Jewry", on myth.

Who Has Rosie Been Talking To?

Some of you may have been wondering things like:

"Did Rosie mention a Physics Professor out of the blue, or did someone mention Prof. Jones to her?"
"Who is this Rosie Source Jon keeps mentioning?"

As it turns out, one of the most prominent members of this movement, and a hero to boot, has been talking to Rosie.

Can you guess who it is?

In case you can't, here are a couple of clues:

He has traveled all over the world speaking to anyone willing to listen to his heroic story.
He recently spoke in Wisconsin in support of Kevin Barrett.
He has been to the White House, and even met the President because of his bravery on 9/11.

Can't figure it out? Lucky for you, Willie Rodriguez has asked me to tell everyone that he fully supports Rosie O'Donnell.

Thank you Willie for your efforts with Rosie. It has been much appreciated.

How 9-11 truth will play out

This is a fictional account of what can happen in the future. This assumes the year is 2007 forward.

1. 9-11 truth is spreading too far for the conspiracists to contain. 9-11 was convenient when it was first executed, citizen rights were curtailed, media was controlled, occupation troops were deployed in Afghanistan and Iraq. At present however, 9-11 is becoming a liability. A big concern is that 9-11 truth, if pursued to its true benefactors would expose the plutocrats that really hold US wealth and power, exposure of the plutocrats is considered unacceptable at any cost.

2. The plutocrats determine that the Republican party cannot win the 2008 elections due to the Iraq war debacle. This is sad for the plutocrats. The Republicans were real go getters. 9-11 after all was executed under their watch.

ISI not connected to Islam, but is connected to 9/11

Abid Ullah Jan has an interesting point of view in this article on recent CIA allegations agains the ISI.

To be fair, like the overall Pakistan military force, the much dreaded ISI has been used like a whore by the CIA in every possible way. At home, both the civilian and military dictators use the ISI as a draconian tool. But this is all that the ISI is: just a tool, without any strategic mission, vision or direction of its own.

and

In this backdrop, the March 2003 hearing of the U.S. Senate[1] was just another threat in the vast trap being laid for the Pakistani army for the next several years. Furthermore, ISI assets, Saeed Sheikh and Khalid Sheikh Mohammed were used in operation 9/11. The extent to which the ISI was dragged into the trap of 9/11 is not fully known. That, however, remains a time bomb for Pakistan. It didn’t get diffused with the “termination” of former ISI chief General Mahmood Ahmad. It can explode at any time the US decides to disarm and neutralise Pakistan like Iraq.

http://usa.mediamonitors.net/content/view/full/42839

Analysing South Park. Cui Bono? By Morgan Stack.

From: Morgan Stack, Scholars for 9/11 Truth Ireland

http://www.911truth.ie/plus-emails/plus42.html

"The Hardy boys are called in to investigate the World Trade Centre conspiracy and once Detective Yates points out that ‘there were two towers that stood right here, and they're gone.’ One of the Hardy boys immediately muses ‘mnnn, who would benefit most from two buildings disappearing?’ The subtext again is easy enough to spot here. Who benefits? Whoever claims the insurance payoff.

For the unaware, that would be one Larry Silverstein, who only purchased the lease to the WTC on July 24th 2001, seven weeks before the buildings were destroyed. This was the first time in the building's 31-year history that the complex had changed ownership. The lease agreement applied to WTC Buildings One, Two, Four and Five, and about 425,000 square feet of retail space. (He already owned WTC7). Silverstein put up only $14 million of his own money and was also given the right to rebuild the structures, should they be destroyed..."

Hardly Boy 1: Ooo... oh, I just started getting a clue.