July 2007

(For a historical archive of our old site visit http://911blogger.com/archive)

Pelosi Says "No" to a New 9/11 Investigation, Claims Close Collaboration with Victim's Families on 9/11 Bill Passage

Pelosi Says "No" to a New 9/11 Investigation, Claims Close Collaboration with Victim's Families on 9/11 Bill Passage
9/11 Investigation Also Off the Table For Speaker Who Refuses to Impeach Bush

Aaron Dykes / JonesReport.com | July 31, 2007

Newport, Rhode Island - Reporters affiliated with WeAreChange.org and Infowars.com confronted Speaker Nancy Pelosi about a new 9/11 investigation just after the passage of the 9/11 Bill, which only increases already strict security measures, particularly in airports.

Pelosi rattled off a quick, "No, no, no" to the idea of a new 9/11 investigation before changing the subject to claim that she "worked closely with the victims' families" and that they supposedly wanted the recent legislation.

Not only were many families of 9/11 victims disappointed with the 9/11 Commission's findings, many 9/11 survivors were outraged that their testimony had been omitted or distorted in the final report. Recommendations by the 9/11 Commission, which were the basis of this legislation, only obscured the lingering questions that families wanted answered in the first place.

Furthermore, nearly all of the victims' families want a new investigation and a large number of families believe 9/11 was an inside job, including Bill Doyle, the head of the largest 9/11 victim's families group.


Thanks, Aaron and Chris for submitting this.

A First for the Journal of 9/11 Studies

Why Did the World’s Most Advanced Electronics Warfare Plane Circle Over The White House on 9/11?
By Mark H. Gaffney
(July volume of the Journalof911Studies.com )

The editors just received word from the author that his paper had to be taken down until further notice, pending approval of posting of some of the photographs in his provocative paper. We did so at the request of the author, who is awaiting approval from CNN to display the photographs of the military plane in question. The editors will restore this paper as soon as approval is received.

Also, please note the letter by Steven W. S., "A Response to the Bennett/Manwell Exchange."
The author writes: "I believe that James Bennett’s questioning of Laurie Manwell's interpretation of the
Angus-Reid poll is unwarranted nit-picking. More importantly I feel that it is also an invalid criticism."

More: http://journalof911studies.com/letters/b/ResponseToBennettManwellExchange.pdf

Redcoats and Scapegoats

This is a response to an AP article today:
"Retired general censured in Tillman case"

AP Article: "It's a perfect storm of mistakes, misjudgments and a failure of leadership," said Geren in announcing his decision after an investigation into the death of the former pro football player.

Aha - mistakes. Sort of like the "mistakes" of NORAD on 9/11? Maybe like the Secret Service breaking protocol in a Florida classroom? Let us not forget that Pat Tillman recieved 3 shots to the head in "close proximity." From an "M16... 10 yards away"
10 Yards. That's one first down marker on a football field. A short pass. Keep that in mind. Incompetence is always the first scapegoat they bring out to cover intent.

"No evidence at all of enemy fire was found at the scene _ no one was hit by enemy fire, nor was any government equipment struck."

urnotfree on Truth Revolution Radio

Truth Revolution Radio July 2007 30 MP3

Las Vegas meetup
urnotfree on myspace

Nick and Kyle from urnotfree were the guests on Monday night's edition of TTR. Topics include guerrilla street art for 9/11 truth, doing street actions on the Strip in Vegas and the upcoming General Strike on September 11. We talk to Chris (CV) from truthaction.org and Luke Rudkowski calls in with breaking news of a confrontation with Nancy Pelosi.

The Eleventh Day of Every Month

In case you missed it

This may well have been already reported here, but in case it got missed, I noticed it just now. Here is the link.


Former Fed analyst questions M1 currency component spike prior to 9/11

March 22, 2007 – William Bergman worked at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago from July 1990 until early 2004. He served as an economist for eight years, and then moved to a senior analyst position in a new department researching financial market and payment system risk policy issues. In late 2003, he was asked to consider an assignment in the money laundering area. Bergman accepted the assignment, underwent a background check, received credentials affording access to confidential banking information, and began working in the area. He was told that he was “part of the fight against terrorism” and that he “had been asking good questions.”

One aspect of the assignment to the money laundering area was for Bergman to develop a paper that, if accepted, could serve as a reference source for the Federal Reserve System.

9/11 doubts becoming mainstream

Noting that she tends to be about six months ahead of mainstream thinking when she speaks up about things, Cindy Sheehan speaks of her doubts about 9/11 in the context of those in power using another false flag attack to implement martial law.

See the second part of this two part interview here (also embedded below)

The first part is here

FBI, Congress: Sibel Edmonds case 'unclassified'

Lukery posted this over at Daily Kos.

In a recent speech, Sibel again emphasized that the reason that she has been gagged is not for reasons of national security, but rather to cover-up criminality, treason, by high level US officials.

As evidence for this claim, Sibel explained that for the three months prior to Ashcroft blanket-gagging her case, the FBI was conducting unclassified briefings for Congress on the case.

In other words, from the beginning, neither Congress, nor the FBI, even considered that this information might be classified, let alone a 'national security' issue.

As Michael Ostrolenk, National Director of the Liberty Coalition, said: "The excuse of protecting national security is fallacious."

Washington DC - 9/11/07

NYC and the First Responder Fund Raiser out of reach? If you live near the nation's capitol, there is a good alternative, four full days of action in DC. A benefit to activism at the capitol is that Congress will be in session, so the Representatives will really have to work to avoid seeing you. Especially if you spend some time being seen around the House.


Come to Washington this September for the historic union of the 9/11Truth, Peace and Impeachment movements.March with us as we honor the victims of 9/11 and the thousands of casualties of the illegal wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Call for the end of the bogus war on terror, impeachment of the criminals in the White House and restoration of our civil liberties.

Come for the Truth, stay for the Peace and Justice!

Tuesday, September 11 Noon - Rally at Lafayette Park,
Pennsylvania Ave., in front of the White House. Cross country walkers arrive.
Speakers: Webster Tarpley, Ralph Schoenman, David Lindorff, Carlo Hawk Walker, and others


This video shows you not squibs but actual blasting charges possibly going off and
rare shots of the making of the WTC "SPIRE".

All the video has been stabilized by me for clarity. The sound has been enhanced and syncronized.

A must see.


Invite Gravel to NYC or Washington for 9/11/07

Senator Gravel has been very supportive of the idea of a new 9/11 investigation.

He has a staff that is very friendly to 9/11 skeptics, and if we can show the campaign that we want a candidate that will stand with us, Gravel could be that man.

All 9/11 skeptics are hereby called upon to write an email to the Gravel campaign to invite Mike to attend the WeAreChange/Alex Jones fundraiser in NYC, or to come and join the festivities in Washington on 9/11/07.

No form-letter-template here, use your own words, and let Gravel know that you want a candidate who isn't scared to look 9/11 in the eye.


(Feel free to make the letter an open letter and post as a comment below.)