August 2007

(For a historical archive of our old site visit http://911blogger.com/archive)

AA changes WIKI-entry on AA flights 11 & 77

I don't know if this is important or if it even EAS AA who changed the entry
or a truther with access to their computers but someone from a IP-number registerd
to American Airlines has changed the WIKI-entry so it now states that none of the 2 planes where
scheduled for flight on 9-11-2001 ..

"* Two American Airlines aircraft were hijacked and crashed during the September+11,+2001+Terrorist+Attack: Flight 77 (a Boeing+757) and Flight 11 (a Boeing+767)."

"* Two American Airlines aircraft were hijacked and crashed during the September+11,+2001+Terrorist+Attack: Flight 77 (a Boeing+757) and Flight 11 (a Boeing+767). Although these flights were daily departures before and a month after September 11, 2001. Neither flight 11 nor 77 were scheduled on September 11, 2001. The records kept by the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (www.bts.gov/gis/) do not list either flight that day."

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=50132865

A-10 Warthog Made the Shanksville Crater?

A-10 Warthog/Thunderbolt was flying very low over the crash site at exactly the moment the explosion, fireball occurred.

Susan Mcelwain - who lives two miles from the site, knows what she saw - the white plane rocketed directly over her head. "It came right over me, I reckon just 40 or 50ft above my mini-van," she recalled. "It was so low I ducked instinctively. It was traveling real fast, but hardly made any sound. "Then it disappeared behind some trees. A few seconds later I heard this great explosion and saw this fireball rise up over the trees, so I figured the jet had crashed. The ground really shook. So I dialed 911 and told them what happened. "I'd heard nothing about the other attacks and it was only when I got home and saw the TV that I realized it wasn't the white jet, but Flight 93. I didn't think much more about it until the authorities started to say there had been no other plane. The plane I saw was heading right to the point where Flight 93 crashed and must have been there at the very moment it came down.

Shatter the Lies: O'Neill Tells '60 Minutes' Iraq Was 'Topic A' 8 Months Before 9-11

Anyone remember this?

"Long before "9/11 changed everything", former Secretary of the Treasury Paul O'Neill reveals that within days of taking office, President Bush was already planning the invasion of Iraq and the overthrow of Saddam."

Polls continue to show many Americans believe Iraq had something to with the attacks and many people see the Iraq war as a response to 9/11. Paul O'Neill was very clear about the Iraq agenda being rolled out 10 days into the first term.

The following CBS clip really needs to be included on any 9/11 DVD material that is being compiled.

Download Full CBS Report:

http://undergroundclips.com/video/ONeil_on_60min_320.mov

"It was all about finding a way to do it. That was the tone of it. The president saying ‘Go find me a way to do this,’" says O’Neill. “For me, the notion of pre-emption, that the U.S. has the unilateral right to do whatever we decide to do, is a really huge leap.”

-------------------------------------------------------------

Also ABC News:

9/11 and The Left

[Updated to include Robert Fisk]

http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2006/03/911-and-left.html

Several prominent liberal writers are arguing that 9/11 is a distraction from the fight for liberal causes. Are they right?

Riddle Me This

Before I address that question, let me ask another one:

Q: What do Daniel Ellsberg, Lewis Lapham, Michael Moore, Cindy Sheehan, Thom Hartmann, Rabbi Michael Lerner, Marc Crispin Miller, Howard Zinn, Ray McGovern, Robert McChesney, Gore Vidal, Robert Fisk, Medea Benjamin, Doris "Granny D" Haddock, Paul Hawken, David Cobb, Randy Hayes, Ernest Callenbach, Dennis Bernstein, Paul H. Ray, Michael Franti, Janeane Garafalo and Ed Asner all have in common?

A: All of these leading liberal voices question the Bush administration's account of what happened on 9/11.

9/11 entries in Wikipedia

I am appalled by the current state of 9/11-related entries on Wikipedia. Looking at the main 9/11 article there, I see that editing has been blocked, which has the effect of freezing the Official Conspiracy Theory as the only available interpretation. There is a Wikipedia entry for the 9/11 Truth Movement, but the main 9/11 article only links to "conspiracy theories," which is not a favorable entry for us.

Does anyone have hardcopy documentation, as a FOIA request to the FBI with a reply, stating that there is no hard evidence that Osama bin Laden was involved in 9/11, or is this only a rumor?

I think that it is important for us to clean house a little bit, making sure that we are dealing with documented facts rather than replicated rumor.

A visual guide to the archive.org clips

Archive.org generates an animated gif for each video. (see original post: http://911blogger.com/node/10830)
On this page they can all be viewed at once. Each image is linked to the source file.
Hold the mouse over a video to read it's url description.

Caution: Don't click here if you are using a 486.
http://governmentterror.com/images/archive.org.agifs.html

Archive.org folder: http://ia341239.us.archive.org/2/items/911_News_Clips/
bash code to generate page: http://pastebin.ca/raw/669866

Barack Obama Confronted!!

Senator Barack Obama paid a visit to Coastal Carolina University yesterday and 911 Truth Myrtle Beach asked him some very important questions.

Enjoy!

Robert Fisk: Even I question the 'truth' about 9/11

digg_url = 'http://www.digg.com/world_news/Robert_Fisk_Even_I_question_the_truth_about_9_11';

Robert Fisk, a veteran reporter on the Middle East, has just come out for 9/11 truth. The Independent's got the story.

Each time I lecture abroad on the Middle East, there is always someone in the audience – just one – whom I call the "raver". Apologies here to all the men and women who come to my talks with bright and pertinent questions – often quite humbling ones for me as a journalist – and which show that they understand the Middle East tragedy a lot better than the journalists who report it. But the "raver" is real. He has turned up in corporeal form in Stockholm and in Oxford, in Sao Paulo and in Yerevan, in Cairo, in Los Angeles and, in female form, in Barcelona. No matter the country, there will always be a "raver".

A "Full And Complete Accounting" Of The 9/11 Attacks

Jon Gold
8/24/2007

The 9/11 Commission's mandate is/was as follows:

The Commission's mandate is to provide a “full and complete accounting” of the attacks of September 11, 2001 and recommendations as to how to prevent such attacks in the future.

Specifically, Section 604 of Public Law 107-306 requires the Commission to investigate "facts and circumstances relating to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001," including those relating to intelligence agencies; law enforcement agencies; diplomacy; immigration, nonimmigrant visas, and border control; the flow of assets to terrorist organizations; commercial aviation; the role of congressional oversight and resource allocation; and other areas determined relevant by the Commission for its inquiry.

Here is a partial list of things omitted from the 9/11 Report:


  • Sibel Edmonds' testimony
  • John M. Cole's testimony
  • Bogdan Dzakovic's testimony
  • Behrooz Sarshar's testimony
  • Melvin A. Goodman's testimony

URGENT!! Full Scale Exercise to be conducted in Oct. '07

With recent warnings from Dr. Paul Craig Roberts regarding a false flag terrorist attack some time this year, I did some research on the web. We all know that terror attacks happen to take place at the same time as simulated government exercises. Well, on the Department of Homeland Security's website I found an interesting declaration. On Oct. 15-24, the government plans to launch a Full Scale Exercise conducted with 15,000 people simulating a real life scenario of a radiological terrorist attack in Arizona, Oregon, and the US territory of Guam.

The scenario goes as such:

RSS