October 2007

(For a historical archive of our old site visit http://911blogger.com/archive)

We need a comparative analysis between the WTC '93 bombing and the 2001 plane impacts

I have been spending the last few hours trying to come up with a way to compare the explosive forces between the '93 bomb and the plane impacts of 2001. However, my lack of expertise in this area of physics, pertaining to kinetic energy, explosive force, pressure, etc. is preventing me from making any sort of informed conclusion. On the other hand the information I have gathered suggests ( and I use that term lightly) that a bomb ( on the order of magnitude used in the '93 bombings: The bomb exploded in the underground garage at 12:17 P.M., generating a pressure estimated over one GPa (Giga Pascal) and opening a 30-meter-wide (98 foot) hole through four sublevels of concrete. The detonation velocity of this bomb was about 15,000 ft/s (4.5 km/s). Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Trade_Center_1993_bombings#Bomb_characteristics) planted in the sub-level basement (which houses the critical main support for the tower) had a much larger probability of collapsing the building than an impact of a 767 carrying 10,000 gallons of jet fuel nearly 1,000 feet up from the basement.

Why Is The 9/11 "Fringe" Movement So Mainstream?

Source: newswithviews.com

By: Devvy
October 25, 2007

“It just didn't make any sense to me... When one starts using his own mind, and not what one was told, there is very little to believe in the official story.” September 5, 2007 - U.S. Navy ‘Top Gun’ pilot, Commander Ralph Kolstad

On October 19, 2007, some individuals in the audience of a taping of the Bill Maher show disrupted the airing; Maher joined security in removing these folks from the building. I know little about Maher and have never subscribed to any of the so-called premium channels like HBO on moral grounds. The individuals removed wanted Maher and his guests to talk about 911. The aftermath was a fresh barrage of verbal missiles aimed at anyone with questions about 911. Useful idiot, John Gibson, of the FAUX (FOX) Network, refers to people with reasonable questions about 911 as "ragtag conspiratorialists."

Mika Tries to Turn Page on Rosie's 9-11 Lunacy

We truthers need to attend to the comments section for this article ASAP!

Source: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/mark-finkelstein/2007/10/30/mika-tries-turn-page-rosies-9-11-lunacy

View Video here

Published on NewsBusters.org (http://newsbusters.org)

Mika Tries to Turn Page on Rosie's 9-11 Lunacy

By Mark Finkelstein

Created 2007-10-30 07:52

Sure, Rosie O'Donnell's a 9-11 conspiracy nut. But she's also a big-time liberal and ardent Republican critic. That makes her our 9-11 conspiracy nut. So let's literally [see screencap] turn the page on her lunacy.

9/11 – A Letter to a Die-Hard Supporter of the Official Explanation

Dr. Frank Legge (PhD in Chemistry) writes a letter to an educated friend who is a "Die-Hard Supporter of the Official Explanation," presenting straightforward arguments regarding the collapse of WTC 7. This marks Letter #50 in the Journal of 9/11 Studies. He begins:

"Dear friend, let's not talk about the details of our previous discussions. Instead let's start from the beginning and consider emotions, and move from there to a brief summary of the case. You already have the observations, calculations and conclusions in the papers in front of you, from the Journal of 9/11 Studies. These will not be repeated, but the essential thread of the argument relating to WTC 7 will be carefully spelled out as an example of how the case for explosives may be made.

Osama Bin Framed?

http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2006/10/osama-bin-framed.html

Project Censored's list of the Top 25 Censored Stories is, appropriately, getting wide coverage all over the web.

The 16th censored story from the Project Censored list reads:

#16 No Hard Evidence Connecting Bin Laden to 9/11
Source:
The Muckraker Report, June 6, 2006, and Ithaca Journal, June 29, 2006
Title: “FBI says, ‘No Hard Evidence Connecting Bin Laden to 9/11’”
Author: Ed Haas
http://www.teamliberty.net/id267.html

Embezzled Money Is Used to Pay Insurance Claims

It is a well kept secret that insurance companies are not required to account for the source of money to pay claims. The relationship between 9/11 and insurance industry money laundering needs further investigation by researchers who have more time and resources than I do.

Larry Silverstein's settlement for the WTC destruction of 9/11 was fraudulent. He received much more than the appraised value of the buildings. Why did the insurance companies not prosecute Silverstein for fraud? It wasn't insurance company money used to pay the settlement. http://www.911blogger.com/node/8886

No regulatory agency oversees that insurance claims are actually paid with insurance company money. Insurance companies accept embezzled money to pay claims. The embezzled money cannot be traced back to its original source.

Here is a documented example. From: http://www.mackwhite.com/Yogurt1.html

Outrageous! Listen to the Snake Oil Sales Talk! Bill Clinton speaks about how Hillary takes care of dying 1st Responders!

Bill Clinton speaks about how Hillary takes care of dying 1st Responders!

Bill Clinton speaks about firefighters and their ailments.

Lies Lies Lies Lies Lies Lies Lies Lies!

Your valued critique and comments pls!

If you are not Outraged, talk to a 1st Responder.

Ask the Feal Good Foundation what Hillary is doing for them.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dYX9KYQZyiY&NR=1

Commentary needed on article at Op Ed News

http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_michael__071030_questioning_9_2f11_and.htm

This article at Op Ed News takes Tarpley, Bollyn, Von Kleist and others to task, based in part on their associations with others.Get on over to Op Ed News and hit the comments section. There is a long comment quoting most of an article by Chip Berlet on conspiracism. It surely requires some response. So far, the 9/11 "official story" folks are dominating the field.

October 30, 2007 at 06:10:12

Questioning 9/11 and to Hell with Caution

by Michael Shaw Page 2 of 2 page(s)

http://www.opednews.com

Tell A Friend

As for David Horowitz, here's a guy who is promoting a rash of anti-radical Islamic events on several US College campuses and in his last outing and along with his perpetual sidekick, Ann Coulter; had invited a guest speaker who turned out to be one of Britain's biggest holocaust deniers. Isn't that a kick in the shorts!?! Frankly I see him(and Coulter) in the same light as I see LaRouche, Bollyn, Piper and Carto.

Listen Carefully to a Master Gatekeeper: Chomsky dispels 9/11 "conspiracies" with "sheer logic"

Listen to a Master Gatekeeper: Chomsky dispels 9/11 "conspiracies"" with "sheer logic"

LOGIC? Hmmmm. Submitted for your valued critique and analysis.

The Art and Science of Gatekeeping.

Someone should refer him to www.ae911truth.org, www.patriotsquestion911.com

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwZ-vIaW6Bc&NR=1

RSS