http://www.usfilms.ea29.com/

THIS FILM IS SPONSORED BY

http://www.luogocomune.net/site/modules/news/library/4directorsb.jpg

URL: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3776750618788792499&ei=bEs-SuuIEojYwgP5peHjAw&q=new+american+century

Welcome to Luogocomune's DVD Shop -- ENGLISH VERSION FILMS
YOU DON'T NEED TO REGISTER TO PLACE AN ORDER
http://www.usfilms.ea29.com/

Massimo Mazzucco is an Italian filmmaker who has lately turned to documentaries in digital format. (See BIO).

Mazzucco is one of the foremost Italian 9/11 "truthers," as his documentary Inganno Globale sparked a major controversy on Italian media in 2006, after having been broadcast nationally by Berlusconi's Canale 5.

http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=13921

by Peter Dale Scott

In his remarkable speech at Cairo University on June 4, President Obama promised “a new beginning.” In the words of the Israeli commentator Uri Avnery, the speech offered “the map of a new world, a different world, whose values and laws he spelled out in simple and clear language -- a mixture of idealism and practical politics, vision and pragmatism.”

Much of what Obama had to say was new, and warmed the hearts of observers like myself, who had become increasingly concerned about the new president’s fidelity to the financial and military policies of the previous Bush-Cheney administration. But while Obama broke new ground on Israel-Palestine issues, he glossed over troubling issues pertaining to the US presence in Iraq and Afghanistan. He also glossed over one of the fundamental issues alienating the Muslim world: America’s relentless efforts to preserve its threatened financial status by moves to dominate the region’s oil resources. Here his careful ambiguity was ominously reminiscent of the Bush era.

Continued...
http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=13921

http://www.timesargus.com/article/20090620/OPINION02/906200304

The truth about 9/11

Published: June 20, 2009

I read with interest the letter from William Rice about 9/11 and the subsequent response from a reader to Rice's observations that discount all the facts that he presented. 9/11 discussions on op-ed pages rarely go well. One writer will offer an observation and then another will claim that observation to be absurd. This was exactly the case last week. No matter what fact you may present that shows the official version of events to be dubious, you will almost certainly be called a conspiracy theorist, or worse. TV personality and Fox News commentator Glenn Beck recently lumped those of us who claim to be part of the 9/11 Truth Movement in the same category as James W. Von Brunn, the man accused of murdering a guard at the Holocaust Museum in Washington, DC. It's a strange leap of logic, but 9/11 discussions rarely elicit logical thinking.

On Wednesday, May 20th 2009, more than 7 years after the 9/11-attacks, alternative perspectives penetrate the Nowegian State Broadcasting Corporation, NRK, for the first time. Three Norwegian scientists have spoken out against a scientific paper endorsed by the University of Copenhagen and with the reply from renowned physicist Steven E. Jones, the academic debate has finally erupted in Oslo.

Three Norwegian scientists has publicly attempted to discredit the University of Copenhagen's findings in a recent scientific paper covering an extensive analysis of dust from the attacks on Manhattan in 2001. The Norwegians do not express direct support for the Bush/Cheney-conspiracy theory about Usama bin Laden.