September 2009

(For a historical archive of our old site visit http://911blogger.com/archive)

Message to PBS ombudsman Michael Getler about "Blueprint for Truth"

Dear mr. Getler,

In your column, which can be found at http://www.pbs.org/ombudsman/2009/09/pbs_yes_and_no.html

you say the following about "9/11: Blueprint for Truth":

"I'm not going to review the films, but on a personal level I find the idea embedded in "Blueprint" of a government conspiracy to blow up those buildings to be preposterous and simply beyond belief and I fault the station for promoting this as part of a pledge drive and presenting it without an accompanying on-the-air program in which critics have their say."

Sir, unless you DO review those films, you have no business commenting on them whatsoever.

In your column, you commit the following logical fallacies in order to sway your readers towards your viewpoint:

  1. Appeal to emotion
  2. Argument from personal incredulity
  3. Special pleading

Debunking The BIGGEST Misconception That Most of Us Have To Deal With

I am sure you have heard this line, or something similar, many times before;

"It would take a huge amount of people to pull it off"

This is the most popular reason why people are skeptics, and it's also the most easy to debunk in 10 seconds.

You say;

"So, what you're telling me is that it would take a huge amount of WELL CONNECTED, WEALTHY, WHITE COLLAR CRIMINALS to pull off 9/11, but yet, you believe that JUST 19 men with box cutters were able to?"

That statement/question stops people in their tracks. You can see their eyes start darting back and forth as the gears in their head come to a grinding halt as they search for a thought. They will then attempt to switch the subject at that point usually.

That one statement has helped me awaken so so so many people. It's a starting point and usually makes people question the way they think about things.

Another one I have heard many times that is;

"It would take tons and tons of explosives"

You say;

"So, what you're telling me is that it tons and tons of explosives, but yet you believe it happened with just a little bit of jet fuel?

That also debunks that claim instantly.

NIST demise in freefall

NIST's demise at freefall speed

Question: If we cut both cables at the same time, which block will reach the ground first?

Answer: According to NIST, both blocks would reach the ground substantially at the same time. The healthy floors below the falling block on the left, according to NIST, didn't offer any particular resistance nor did they slow down in any way its path towards the ground.

As the 9/11 Truth Movement kept asking for clarifications, in September 2007 NIST answered: "We are unable to provide a full explanation of the total collapse." (Page 4, top par.)

In other words, NIST maintains that an event against the laws of physics took place, while being unable to explain how it could have happened.

Bringing Awareness Of Sibel Edmonds's Testimony To The Media

Hello Truthseekers & Truthtellers,
At our recent Meetup of our organization/group (Take A Stand For 9/11 Truth - ts911t.org) we decided to use our next street action on Oct. 11th, 2009 to bring awareness to the Sibel Edmond's testimony and the article that is coming out in The American Conservative Magazine. We made a sign that, in a way, confronts our local news organizations to look at this story/testimony of Sibel Edmonds and we hope use it on thier local news programs and our local newspaper. We feel that this is the right timing to demonstrate in front of the news organizations with the article coming out in the November 2009 issue of the magazine. We encourage other organizations/groups to do the same in thier upcoming street actions. There's a picture of our sign with the story of Sibel Edmonds about half-way down on our homepage at:

http://www.ts911t.org/

Take Care Matt

Phoenix, AZ building set for implosion

The first explosive demolition to take place in Phoenix in three decades will be caught on camera for a TV show about a family of demolition experts.

The old Qwest building at Third Street and Earll Drive will be imploded at 10 a.m. Sunday by Coeur d'Alene, Idaho-based Advanced Explosives Demolition Inc. The company's owners are the subject of a new television show called "Dynamite Family" set to air in December on TLC.

http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/local/articles/2009/09/26/20090926blast0926.html

Do you think it will look exactly like WTC7? I do.

For Those About To Rock, We Salute You

If you are going to the march tomorrow, and if you live in the area, I hope that you are, bring an umbrella. They are calling for "Heavy Rain." As I just posted on Facebook, the march for NYC CAN is not just a march in support of the initiative. It is a statement that says you support the cause of 9/11 Truth. It is a statement that says you know we were lied to, that the families, the responders, the people of this country, and the world deserve absolute truth, absolute accountability, and absolute justice for the 9/11 attacks. Please, if you can make it, do so.

The march is at 2PM at Battery Park in NYC.

Letter to Editor: Whistleblower case merits investigation

http://www.cmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090925/OPINION/909250324/1029/OPINION03

September 25, 2009 - 12:00 am

I am alarmed about the detailed allegations that have now come to public light in the case of Sibel Edmonds, the former FBI language specialist who was fired after accusing a colleague of covering up illicit activity. The allegations, outlined by Edmonds in a recent interview in The American Conservative, concern a massive corruption scheme involving U.S. government employees, members of Congress and agents of foreign governments, primarily Turkey.

Taking bribes and receiving favors from foreign governments seeking to influence decisions on vital matters of U.S. national security constitutes the gravest possible breach of the public trust. If these allegations are true, and we now have very plausible evidence that they are, then they merit the highest possible level of public concern, and urgent congressional investigation and action.

JREF debunkers

In my opinion there are two main types of debunker. There are 'Shills' who are paid government propaganda assets tasked to talk down the 9/11 Movement for Truth and there are 'Saps' who are their hangers-on. These are often poor lost souls who suffer from moral cowardice and are only too willing to swallow whole the poor fare offered by the Shills. These are by far the biggest group of debunkers.

In the immortal words of Mike Rivero;-

"Most people prefer to believe their leaders are just and fair even in the face of evidence to the contrary, because once a citizen acknowledges that the government under which they live is lying and corrupt, the citizen has to choose what he or she will do about it. To take action in the face of a corrupt government entails risks of harm to life and loved ones. To choose to do nothing is to surrender one's self-image of standing for principles. Most people do not have the courage to face that choice. Hence, most propaganda is not designed to fool the critical thinker but only to give moral cowards an excuse not to think at all

9/11 Physics Truth

I started work on the 9/11 Physics Truth site last spring and finally got around to cleaning it up enough for release.

My intention is to present easy to read physics arguments that anyone can quickly understand and share with others, thus spreading the word and waking up more people. While we need to continue doing solid scientific research and presenting arguments that prove our case, we also need the support of many more people. The science is not that difficult for most people to understand, but we do need to do a better job of presenting it for easy understanding.

The site is a wiki, and I am hoping to get help from others to add comments, correct any misunderstandings I may have, create more graphics and videos, and fill in more of the detailed arguments, as well as address many other physics-related issues.

New Statesman Cover Story: David Ray Griffin 41st Most Influential Person in the World!

Letter from David Ray Griffin published here with his approval - Adam

Dear Colleagues,

I'm sending you a few selections from the cover story in the recent New Statesman. Check out # 41.

This is rather amazing: Even though it's a backhanded compliment, it is QUITE a compliment to me and the 9/11 Truth Movement. This famous left-wing British magazine does, to be sure, say that we are "pernicious," but it seems to think that we are quite significant, being one of the 50 most important groups in the world at this time.

My only regret is the number 41 position: I always hated it in the 1980s when little old ladies would tell me that I looked "just like George Bush. (For those of you in other countries, "41" is the short-hand reference for George H.W. Bush, our 41st president.)