October 2009
(For a historical archive of our old site visit http://911blogger.com/archive)
Just Say No to Nist, a review of David Ray Griffin's Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7
Just Say No to NIST
By Jerry Mazza
A review of The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7:
Why the Official Report about 9/11 is Unscientific and False
A book by David Ray Griffin
The headline, “Just Say No to NIST” (the National Institute of Standards and Technology) is purposely patterned after Nancy Reagan’s “Just Say No to Drugs.” In the case of David Griffin’s new book, The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7, the NIST lies, half truths, omissions, and the outright corruption of honest science are the administration’s dope, administered by NIST, to lull inquiring minds into believing the fantasy of their lies.
NIST’s violations of scientific method, as Griffin clearly explains, represent what he terms the “politicization of science,” used to delude Americans to accept the Bush administrations’ conspiracy theory. That is, the World Trade Center Tower 7, the Tower not hit by an airliner, fell into its own footprint in six seconds at 5:20 PM on 9/11 as a result of minor fires, not explosives planted in the 47-story steel-framed building to create a classic internal demolition—uncannily resembling so many we’ve seen in movies or on TV.
Sibel Edmonds and John M. Cole on 9/11 era to present corruption of a spy nest in DC pointing to quite a list of neocons
An interesting listen that seems to summarize Sibel's past info, attempts to clear a few issues that some have had (including myself), and offers a few proposals of steps forward:
Which way, 911-truth? Our greatest strength is, also, our greatest weakness.
So here we are in year zero plus eight, and time keeps slipping into yesterday. What shape are we in? Where have we gotten? What, if anything, is our goal? How are we going to agree on a goal, and who will carry it out, and through what means will it be accomplished? It's really incredible, if you think about it. In fact, the more you think about it, the more incredible it becomes: despite all of our progress, the world is still operating under the same demonstrably false paradigm.
Growing Up Bin Laden: Osama's Son Speaks
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1932318,00.html
By Andrew Lee Butters
Tuesday, Oct. 27, 2009
For Omar Bin Laden, the fourth eldest of Osama bin Laden's 20 known children, the awful realization that his own father was a terrorist mastermind plotting a global conspiracy that would destroy the lives of thousands of innocent people and even his own family came gradually. Of course, there were warning signs: Omar's childhood was marked by regular beatings and survivalist training; there was the growing army of ruffians and retainers who called his father "Prince"; and then there was that Afghan mullah who had given his father an entire mountain in Tora Bora.
Tariq Mehanna: Obama's Latest Muslim Target by Stephen Lendman Monday, 26 October Baltimore Cronicle
http://www.baltimorechronicle.com/2009/102609Lendman.shtml
Tariq Mehanna: Obama's Latest Muslim Target
by Stephen Lendman
Monday, 26 October 2009
Given government policies and given slanderous media characterizations, it's no surprise why it's dangerous to be Muslim in America.
Post-9/11, Muslims have been victimized, vilified, and persecuted for their faith, ethnicity, prominence, activism, and charity. They've been targeted, hunted down, rounded up, held in detention, kept in isolation, denied bail, restricted in their right to counsel, tried on secret evidence, convicted on bogus charges, given long sentences, then incarcerated for extra harsh treatment as political prisoners in segregated Communication Management Units (CMUs) in violation of US Prison Bureau regulations and the Supreme Court's February 2005 Johnson v. California decision.
An October 21 FBI press release announced Tariq (mispelled Tarek) Mehanna as its most recent target saying:
"A Sudbury, Mass. man was charged today in federal court with conspiracy to provide support to terrorists."
- Joe's blog
- Read more
- Login to post comments
Did Training Exercises Prevent Andrews Air Force Base From Responding to the 9/11 Attacks?
Why did airplanes fly around for an hour and a half without interceptors being
scrambled from Andrews [Air Force Base] ... right next to the capital?
- Paul Hellyer, Canadian minister of national defense, 1963-1967
Many aircraft at a military base just outside Washington, DC, were taking part in training exercises around the time the terrorist attacks occurred on September 11, 2001, it has been revealed. But whether these exercises impaired the ability of the various units at the base to effectively respond to the attacks has never been properly investigated.
Adam Syed discusses Pentagon anomalies and "National Security Alert" on Cincinnati TV
Last Wednesday evening on Cincinnati 9/11 Truth's weekly TV show, I gave a presentation, close to half an hour, on Pentagon attack anomalies and eyewitness testimonies. I explain the background as to why people were suspicious of the Pentagon to begin with, the lack of evidence for some of the early theories in the movement, the importance of the official flight and damage path. Then I present three eyewitnesses from the gas station who are one hundred percent certain that the plane did not fly that official path. This coming Wednesday: Roosevelt Roberts' and Lloyde England's testimony. Enjoy!
Starts at about the 1 minute mark on the first video.
ETA after viewing the preview of this entry: How beautiful that the third video's still image is of Lagasse saying "100% bet my life on it" !
Obama's H1N1 national emergency declaration could invoke FEMA response to pandemic
NaturalNews.com has an opinion piece Mon. Oct. 26, 2009, about Obama's declaration of a national emergency in response to a "pandemic."
http://www.naturalnews.com/027330_fema_pandemic_H1N1.html
Excerpt:
"What are these people not telling us?
"Something doesn't add up here. Why would the U.S. government need to declare a national emergency to enable hospitals to handle a flood of sick people when there is no flood of sick people (and the pandemic seems to be fizzling out)?
"This is more like the kind of preparation you might expect in advance of a biological terrorism attack, not for a flu that appears no more dangerous than the seasonal sniffles."
- notthere56's blog
- Login to post comments
NY Times: "The Cover-Up Continues"
No, no mention of 9/11. Just a reminder that for the mainstream press you can talk about Bush's "abuses of power," but you can't cross the imaginary line that protects the 9/11 Commission.
October 26, 2009
Editorial
The Cover-Up Continues
The Obama administration has clung for so long to the Bush administration’s expansive claims of national security and executive power that it is in danger of turning President George W. Bush’s cover-up of abuses committed in the name of fighting terrorism into President Barack Obama’s cover-up.
We have had recent reminders of this dismaying retreat from Mr. Obama’s passionate campaign promises to make a break with Mr. Bush’s abuses of power, a shift that denies justice to the victims of wayward government policies and shields officials from accountability.
Report: UK police categorize political activists as ‘domestic extremists’
http://rawstory.com/2009/10/report-uk-police-categorize-political-activists-domestic-extremists/
Report: UK police categorize political activists as ‘domestic extremists’
By Stephen C. Webster
Sunday, October 25th, 2009 -- 8:55 pm
Share on Facebook Stumble This!
British police inspectors have been building a massive, secret database containing personal information on thousands of otherwise innocent political activists, an investigative report revealed Sunday.
"The hidden apparatus has been constructed to monitor 'domestic extremists', the Guardian can reveal in the first of a three-day series into the policing of protests. Detailed information about the political activities of campaigners is being stored on a number of overlapping IT systems, even if they have not committed a crime."
The UK paper added that the term "domestic extremist" has no legal basis, but is instead intended to tar those who may have participated in something so benign as civil disobedience.
Even merely attending a protest and standing on the outskirts of the crowd can be enough to land one on the National Public Order Intelligence Unit's list of "domestic extremists."
- loose nuke's blog
- Read more
- Login to post comments