October 2010

(For a historical archive of our old site visit http://911blogger.com/archive)

Johann Hari: Protest works. Just look at the proof

Not specifically related to 9/11, but the principles apply - loose nuke

Source: http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/johann-hari/johann-hari-protest-works-just-look-at-the-proof-2119310.html

Johann Hari: Protest works. Just look at the proof
Yes, you can choose to do nothing. But you will be choosing to let yourself and your family and your country be ripped off

Friday, 29 October 2010

There is a ripple of rage spreading across Britain. It is clearer every day that the people of this country have been colossally scammed. The bankers who crashed the economy are richer and fatter than ever, on our cash. The Prime Minister who promised us before the election “we’re not talking about swingeing cuts” just imposed the worst cuts since the 1920s, condemning another million people to the dole queue. Yet the rage is matched by a flailing sense of impotence. We are furious, but we feel there is nothing we can do. There’s a mood that we have been stitched up by forces more powerful and devious than us, and all we can do is sit back and be shafted.

Australian TV Interview with Activist/Engineer John Bursill - Talking About AE911Truth.org

From the YouTube notes: Many Kind Thanks to TVS (CH 31, Digital CH44) and "Yianni's City Life" for their co-operation in AIRING John Bursill, Spokesperson for 9/11 Truth in Australia. This was the First TV Program BRAVE enough in AUSTRALIA to give a "Balanced" presentation on the "9/11 Tragedy" that has affected us all.


You can contact TVS and thank them by e-mail at email@tvs.org.au

Journalist and Filmmaker John Pilger on 9/11


Source: 9/11 Truth News
Category: SUPPORT

At the 2010 Anarchist Bookfair in London there was a discussion with independent journalist and filmmaker John Pilger (which was recorded - listen below) and one of the questions from the audience was about the attacks on 9/11. The following is a transcript of the question and his reply:

Audience Question: "I would like to ask your views or theory that the US government was complicit in or even perpetrated the attacks on 9/11 to gain support for criminal [inaudible] Afghanistan and Iraq?"

John Pilger: "I think there is a lot of evidence that certain elements in the Bush administration, whether by intent or by or by their own arrogant incompetence, I don't know, let things happen. I think there is enough evidence to...

We know the senior FBI people who gave warnings right throughout 2001. We know about the extraordinary inactivity by the NORAD aircraft on the day of September 11th. We know that Cheney was in charge of the White House on that day.

Roseanne Barr For 9/11 Truth Part 2


Roseanne Barr continued her public exploration of the 9/11 issue on her radio show today in a discussion with former FBI agent Coleen Rowley and researcher and activist Jon Gold. You can listen to the full interview here.

Join 9/11 Truth News on facebook and twitter.

Bruno Bruhwiler, lead organizer of WeAreChangeLA, falsely accused of making a Terrorist Threat.

November 2010 Update

A lot of time has passed since the last update in regards to the fight for my freedom against perjured charges. My current attorney has been kept busy in court on other cases.

It has been decided, we are going to trial by jury. I was offered to sign a false confession on more than one occasion, but I refused. If I’m going to prison, then 12 jurors will send me there. I stand by my rights to due process, and my rights to dissent against tyranny at all levels of government.

Originally, I was charged with making a terrorist threat, a felony, against a Sheriff’s Deputy, and I was charged with two counts of felony resisting arrest, as well as misdemeanor contempt of court. Sheriffs Deputy Juan Espinoza interrupted me when I was talking and told me to my face, “You just threatened to assassinate me! That’s a terrorist threat!” This was about an hour after he had put handcuffs on me without probable cause. Apparently he was on the hunt to find something… anything he could charge me with. As you can see near the end of this video from WeAreChange Colorado ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMbV9UnQ7rE ), officers of the law have been instructed to determine whether or not anybody they detain is a terrorist. As far as we know, an officer gets a bonus if they detain someone they can pin as a terrorist.

A few months ago, one person wrote an article claiming that I was not charged with terrorism, but later apologized. The confusion stemmed from the actual count against me, which is California Penal Code 422. Though the code does not read ‘terrorism’ or ‘terrorist threat’, this is the code used when someone in California is charged with making a terrorist threat. I imagine they use this code because no new code has been written to cover charges of making a terrorist threat. Regardless, my testimony will include that Espinoza accused me of making a terrorist threat against him.

Conversation with Jeremy Rothe-Kushel 10-15-2010

Conversation with Jeremy Rothe-Kushel 10-15-2010 on Vimeo.

I went to the We are Change L.A. meeting with Mike Gravel on October 15th. I met some people in person for the first time that I've only known or seen online. It was quite a moving experience for me. I was left with the deepest sense respect and gratitude for all I saw there. Thanks Bruno Bruhwiler, Katy Kurtzman, Laurel Burik, Bob Sherman, Mr. Gravel, and all contributors. Mr. Rothe-Kushel, thanks for taking the time with me for the above video.


antagamen squaret

The Kevin Bracken Story: These Alternative Websites and media outlets have not covered the story AT ALL.

I have just done a search on several of the most popular alternative websites for any information they have posted about Kevin Bracken. This story, about an important person in Australia, and the popular support he has gotten after his stand about 9/11 truth, should be everywhere, at least on the alternative media.
And yet, not a word.
I went to each of these sites, put a search for whatever they had published about Kevin Bracken. None of the searches came up with any stories.
I feel this is a good indication of a real purposeful censorship. It is hard to miss this huge story. I am not surprised at the msm avoiding the story. But we rely on the alternative media to tell us about issues that the msm and their corporate sponsors are not keen on us seeing.

Let's follow these sites about other big 9/11 stories and see how they avoid the topics.
Something is obviously going on. It is not just ignorance of the facts. They do not want to publish this information. I call that very irresponsible, if not criminal.

These are the media outlets that have not covered the Kevin Bracken story:


If you have seen some stories about Kevin Bracken in these outlets, let me know. I am only going by what I have seen, not seen, and searched.

Up a crooked creek: Censorship and civility in the truth movement

By Kevin Ryan


I’ve been censored many times.  When I am completely honest with myself, however, I realize that some of those instances were not actually censorship but were forms of editorial discretion.   Other instances were simply attempts by propagandists to downplay the truth. 


Editorial Discretion:  When CommonDreams.org failed to respond to my article from 2003, it was making a decision that what I had to say was, for them, more of a nightmare than a shared dream.  CommonDreams.org had published other articles that could be seen as related to 9/11 truth, but my approach was not to the editor’s liking.  In response, I did not begin a public campaign against them but instead found many other sites to publish my articles.

Censorship:  A leading alternative news site that regularly publishes 9/11 truth stories rejected one of my articles in late 2008, despite the fact that I had published there before.  The editor responded very emotionally to the article, and suggested that it “attacked solid progressives.”  The editor’s response was itself a great demonstration of what the article conveyed — that people have built-in mechanisms which keep them from seeing truth.  In any case, I did not start a public campaign against the site and would never have thought of wasting my time and energies doing so.  That’s because my goal is to reveal and communicate the truth.

Propaganda:  When, in 2007, Wikipedia promoted highly dubious sources like “Mark Roberts” in an attempt to smear me, yet on the exact same subjects openly ignored sources like The New York Times and Underwriters Laboratories, that was not censorship, it was propaganda.  But again, I did not start a campaign against Wikipedia nor did I try to strike back at the site despite the fact that it was intentionally working to defeat the truth.

I’ve found that, in nearly all cases, when faced with editorial discretion, censorship or propaganda, people will find other venues to share their information when they are not successful at one site.  Again, that is because they seek to reveal the truth, not simply to commandeer one particular venue.  Others, however, are curiously vindictive.

Victorian Trades Hall President Kevin Bracken: Persecuted for Supporting 9/11 Truth / 3 Parts

Alex talks with the Victorian Trades Hall president, Kevin Bracken, who has sparked controversy for his comments that the September 11, 2001, attacks were a conspiracy and not the result of terrorist activity on the part of Muslim cave-dwellers. Bracken is also the secretary of the Maritime Union of Australia. "In my mind the buildings were imploded," Bracken said during an appearance on the Jon Faine radio program earlier this month.

Victorian Trades Hall President Kevin Bracken: Persecuted for Supporting 9/11 Truth 1/3


Victorian Trades Hall President Kevin Bracken: Persecuted for Supporting 9/11 Truth 2/3