August 2011
(For a historical archive of our old site visit http://911blogger.com/archive)
NY Ch 2 News: 2 men with explosives caught at GW Bridge on 9/11
- stewball's blog
- Login to post comments
CBS to Broadcast "9/11 10 Years Later"
By Robert Seidman
– August 1, 2011Posted in: Network TV Press Releases
http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2011/08/01/cbs-to-broadcast-911-10-years-later/99297/
via press release:
CBS TO BROADCAST “9/11: 10 YEARS LATER,” MARKING THE 10TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE WORLD TRADE CENTER ATTACK,
SUNDAY, SEPT. 11, 8:00-10:00 PM, ET/PT
The Update of the Critically Acclaimed, Multi Award-Winning Program, “9/11,” Will Feature New Interviews with Many of the Firefighters Featured in the Original Presentation
Robert De Niro Hosts this Historic Broadcast from Inside Ground Zero 10 Years Later, Showcasing Exclusive Footage inside the Site and Looking Back at Its History, with a Look Forward to the Future
The CBS Television Network and filmmakers Jules and Gedeon Naudet and James Hanlon will present “9/11: 10 YEARS LATER,” an update of the critically acclaimed, multiple award-winning film, “9/11,” to be broadcast on CBS as a special presentation Sunday, Sept. 11 (8:00-10:00 PM, ET/PT), the 10th anniversary of the attack on the World Trade Center.
Robert De Niro to host CBS' '9/11' update
By Ann Oldenburg
Aug 01, 2011
Get ready for lots of 9/11 programming coming up on TV as we mark the 10th anniversary of the attack on the World Trade Center next month.
Just announced: Robert De Niro will host CBS' 9/11: 10 Years Later, an update of the award-winning 2002 film 9/11. Filmmakers Jules and Gedeon Naudet and James Hanlon were filming in a New York Firehouse when the attack happened. They kept their cameras rolling.
The update will air on Sept. 11 at 8 p.m. and promises to contain the only known footage of the first plane striking the World Trade Center and the only footage from inside Ground Zero during the attacks.
Psychopaths: the perfect academic word for US political, economic “leadership”
*hyperlinks and video live at source: http://www.examiner.com/nonpartisan-in-national/psychopaths-the-perfect-academic-word-for-us-political-economic-leadership
Psychopaths are viciously destructive in action. They obfuscate with lies and charm. They persist only when their actions are unrecognized; 95% of the population reject such criminal destruction (here and here).
US political and economic “leadership” are psychopaths because their central policies are viciously destructive, as the following links explain, document, and prove. “Leadership” obfuscate with lies, charm, and US corporate media complicity.
Calling this behavior psychopathic is perfect because it neither understates nor overstates the facts. Use this academic term at your command. I also suggest Princeton professor Frankfurt’s academic term for the type of “lies” that “leadership” uses: bullshit.
“As I grow older, I pay less attention to what men say. I just watch what they do.” - unsourced and attributed to Andrew Carnegie
The destruction of millions of lives and trillions of dollars will end when enough Americans recognize and assert the “emperor has no clothes” facts:
- synergist's blog
- Read more
- Login to post comments
8 Reasons Young Americans Don't Fight Back: How the US Crushed Youth Resistance
The ruling elite has created social institutions that have subdued young Americans and broken their spirit of resistance.
Air Policing
Some General Remarks Concerning Air Defense
(triggered by the publications of Paul Schreyer)
Any scientific approach towards a subject tries to investigate with different methods and viewpoints from different angles, using experience and logic and the tool bar of the specific science branch. This includes btw. theories too, but even theories must be based on the facts which do not fit together without those theories.
9/11 has in general to be viewed from the two perspectives “attack” and “defense” If we stick to the word “war” for the 9/11 event we may compare it with the approach used by historians and people in general throughout the centuries: every citizen is interested not only in the attacks, but also in the defense of his country. A lost battle would always produce the question about the system of defense and the persons who were responsible for it. Even when investigating a simple car accident every judge would not only ask what the undoubtedly wrongly driving car had done but also what the hit cardriver could have done to prevent the accident or to minimize the effect of the crash.