October 2011

(For a historical archive of our old site visit http://911blogger.com/archive)

Russ Baker Discusses 9/11 Commission Report, Usama Bin Laden Death and more

Nor Cal Truth

Russ Baker visited the California coastal community of Point Reyes on 9/29/11.

Russ is the author of Family of Secrets – The Bush Dynasty, The Powerful Forces That Put it in The White House, and What Their Influence Means for America.

After discussing some very interesting details and facts presented in his book, Russ was able to answer some questions from the audience.

Questions ranged from journalism in the 21st century and hackers, to Saudi connections to 9/11 and how Commissions, including the 9/11 Commission ”never, ever get to the bottom of anything“. Watch the video above for more.

Russ is creating a media platform at: http://whowhatwhy.com/

 

'My 9/11' bystander video by Dave Vanadia

Not sure if this has been posted already. An hour-long street-level view of bystanders' reactions on that day. Interesting, and moving, for those of us who were not there.

http://www.vanadia.com/nycstories/my-911/story/

Also note 9:50 - 10:30, while WTC 1 is still burning, a startled reaction from the crowd, and movement north, away from the scene.

Following that, bystanders notice a fighter jet? flying near the scene.

Joshua Blakeney Speaks out about 9/11 Truth @ Occupy Vancouver

More videos of Joshua Blakeney calling for 9/11 Truth and for Canada to enforce the rule of law.

Meltdown - The men who crashed the world

Uploaded by AlJazeeraEnglish on Sep 21, 2011


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zZ_JfROhOE
PART 1- Meltdown - The men who crashed the world


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqBlVBhv0ag&feature=related
PART 2- Meltdown - The men who crashed the world


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBhAvUTW5ZE&feature=related
PART 3- Meltdown - Paying the Price


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZwMIIJLWOw&feature=related
PART 4- Meltdown - After the Fall

Norman Mineta: Mistaken Identity

Concerning Norman Mineta’s testimony about being with Cheney in the PEOC---

Briefly, the story is that Cheney was getting updates about a flight headed for DC from a “young man” who stated the plane was 50, 30, then 10 miles out.

Most people will assume that Mineta is referring to AA77, not UA93. There is an attempt by the media and others to shift away from AA77 towards UA93. By doing this they are able to push the time ahead and protect Cheney from criticism about a shoot down or a stand down. But this has some seriously fatal flaws.

See this video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6XY2pMZl7yw

At mark ~:50 he is talking about the young man describing a plane that is 50 miles out.

At mark ~1:00 Mineta is on the phone with Monte Belger who tells him the target is somewhere beyond Great Falls. In other words about 25 miles up river from DC. He says twice they cannot tell the speed.** Then he says they lost the bogey somewhere between Rosslyn and Reagan Airport. Both Great Falls and Rosslyn are North of the Pentagon.

Here is the same thing from Belger:

The Pacifica Radio ''Twin Towers Debate'' on 9/11/2011

by Ron Brookman, S.E.

Thank you to Mickey Huff and KPFA radio for hosting the Twin Towers debate on the tenth anniversary of September 11. Richard Gage and Niels Harrit described hard evidence for the controlled-demolition hypothesis; Dave Thomas and Richard Muller promoted the fire-induced collapse hypothesis. Listen to the entire debate at http://www.kpfa.org/archive/id/73245.

Richard Gage, AIA is a San Francisco Bay Area architect and founder of AE911Truth—a nonprofit organization with over 1,600 professional architects and engineers plus over 13,000 others who are calling for a science-based investigation of the destruction of the three high-rise buildings.1

Dr. Niels Harrit, associate professor emeritus of chemistry from the University of Copenhagen, has published over 60 peer-reviewed papers in scientific journals including ''Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe."2

Encourage Occupy Wall Street to Demand a Real 9/11 Investigation | Only Two Days Left – Vote Now!

Hot News/Information/Events     •     October 18, 2011
 

Not displaying properly? View Action Alert online

Encourage Occupy Wall Street
to Demand a Real 9/11 Investigation
Only Two Days Left – Vote Now!

Please act now and join 9/11 Truth advocates around the world by voting before 10/21/11 to include a real 9/11 investigation as one of the demands of Occupy Wall Street:

http://coupmedia.org/the-sovereign-peoples-movement/6-re-investigate-the-attacks-of-9-11-2001.html

The 9/11 Truth community is passionate, dedicated and persistent. The issues we bring to the table will greatly enhance the Occupy Wall Street movement. Please act now with your vote.

Regardless of the political opinions of Occupy Wall Street, the massive media attention that this diverse group has received over last few weeks can help propel the calls for an independent 9/11 investigation into the mainstream press.

To be listed as an official demand of Occupy Wall Street, a demand needs to have over 67% “Yes” votes at the time of the voting deadline. The demand for a new 9/11 investigation has been on the official choice list for several weeks, but approval has dropped from 80% down to 74%, with only 5,000 votes cast. In order to increase the margin of safety and guarantee approval, we need supporters of AE911Truth to let their voices be heard and vote “Yes” on this proposal before the October 21 deadline.

Please vote yes if you haven’t already, and forward to all 9/11 truth supporters and groups that you know:

http://coupmedia.org/the-sovereign-peoples-movement/6-re-investigate-the-attacks-of-9-11-2001.html

Thank you!
Richard Gage, AIA
Founder, CEO AE911Truth

Anthrax Investigations Continue: Journal of Bioterrorism & Biodefense

 

Hugh-Jones, BH Rosenberg, S Jacobsen, 2011. The 2001 anthrax attack: Key observations. Journal of Bioterrorism & Biodefense, Special Issue 3, 2011

Abstract Unresolved scientific questions, remaining 10 years after the anthrax attacks, 3 years after the FBI accused a dead man of perpetrating the 2001 anthrax attacks single-handedly, and more than a year since they closed the case without further investigation, indictment or trial, are perpetuating serious concerns that the FBI may have accused the wrong person of carrying out the anthrax attacks. The FBI has not produced concrete evidence on key questions: - Where and how were the anthrax spores in the attack letters prepared? There is no material evidence of where the attack anthrax was made, and no direct evidence that any specific individual made the anthrax, or mailed it.

RSS