October 2012
(For a historical archive of our old site visit http://911blogger.com/archive)
Shop? Go To Jail!
See this hidden video of two Canadian tourists getting a taste of the new Amerikan Police State.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-i5sDOdoFqg&feature=player_embedded
Good thing it wasn't me. My conversation would go this way:
Police: Which store are you going shopping at?
Me: I'm going to Herr Hitler's Boutique. The same place you got your shiny jack boots.
F*****ing NAZIs suck.
Sheen and Harrelson to star in 9/11 'truther' film
Film calls for independent investigation into the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon in 2001
By Ben Arnold | Yahoo UK Movies News
Martin Sheen and Woody Harrelson are to star in a new film which questions the official story behind the 9/11 attacks.
'September Morn' supports some of the theories of the 'truther' movement, which has questioned the established version of the events of September 11, hinting at a government conspiracy.
The publicity note which the film is using, rather than give the usual idea of plot, reads: “We the people demand that the government revisits and initiates a thorough and independent investigation to the tragic events of 9/11. In the vein of 'Twelve Angry Men' this dramatic piece is set with a stellar and award winning cast.”
Also signed up are Judd Nelson, Ed Asner and Esai Morales.
9/11 Insider Trading Whistleblower Richard Grove on Red Ice Radio
Extremely interesting interview with insider Richard Grove who worked on software projects inside the world trade center!
research on the recent Denver massacre by my friend Adam Coate
David I've added the embed links from youtube. They don't seem to work in email, so I'm not sure they're going to work on 9/11 Blogger either. But if people are interested they can click the links. I also expanded with some other videos.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Adam Coate
Date: Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 5:36 PM
Subject: Fwd: James Holmes - Reasonable Doubts
To: Adam Coate
In no particular order here are the things I feel are the most important in casting reasonable doubt on James Holmes' guilt.
1) No means to carry out crime. James Holmes had never gone to a shooting range before. Clearly the 90 seconds total shooting time stated by Oates isn't realistic. However, even if we assume the shooting lasted 3 minutes (which seems to be true), an AR-15 semi-automatic can shoot 50-60 rounds per minute unless you're really good. Also keep in mind shotgun rounds were shot as well in this (a non-auto shotgun), which obviously has a much slower rate of fire. So I estimate the maximum number of shots that could've been fired by James Holmes at around 100. With 70 victims, that would put his accuracy at 70%. Also, a shotgun has lots of recoil, and an inexperienced marksman like Holmes would have struggled with it.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505263_162-57478483/miller-aurora-shooter-must-have-practiced/
2) No motive. The only motive seems to be gun control, among other things. Obama still supports bringing back the assault rifle ban. This seems to be him doubling down on the failure of his Fast and Furious black op.
http://news.yahoo.com/administration-urges-terror-surveillance-renewal-182138348.html
Eutelsat removes 19 Iranian satellite TV channels Published on Oct 17, 2012 by PressTVGlobalNews
Eutelsat removes 19 Iranian satellite TV channels
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FnPwINz9oXk&feature=g-all-u
Published on Oct 17, 2012 by PressTVGlobalNews
The European Telecommunications Satellite Organization, Eutelsat shut down 19 Iranian TV channels in Europe. The satellite provider acted in the name of the EU. Many viewers in Europe, the Middle East and Africa are affected by this action.
Press TV's Jo Anthony Torno reports from Vienna.
Follow our Facebook on: http://www.facebook.com/presstvchannel
- Joe's blog
- Login to post comments
FBI provides NYC bomber with explosives Published on Oct 17, 2012 by RTAmerica
FBI provides NYC bomber with explosives
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PLHI9ythR2w&feature=g-all-u
Published on Oct 17, 2012 by RTAmerica
The FBI says they have arrested a man on terrorism charges for trying to blow up the New York Federal Reserve bank in Lower Manhattan's financial district. It was a joint operation with NYPD and they say the suspect was flagged after he made suspicious posts on the Internet. It turns out, however, that the FBI provided the Bangladeshi national who came to US earlier this year with the fake explosives he attempted to detonate. So why is it called a terrorist attack then? RT's Kristine Frazao explains.
Like us and/or follow us:
http://twitter.com/RT_America
http://www.facebook.com/RTAmerica
Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz on The NDAA and Secret Kill List
Last night at the presidential debate at Hofstra University, Luke Rudkowski got a chance to talk to Obama's representative congresswomen Debbie Wasserman Schultz in the Spin Room. The Spin room was full of spin as both Obama and Romney representative's dodged questions from WeAreChange after the debates. There will more interesting video's coming from the spin room on this channel, so don't forget to subscribe to WeAreChange. We release as many videos as we can every Monday through Thursday
Become a member of The Sponsor Lounge and get exclusive behind the scenes content while helping us grow!
Join us today! http:///www.wearechange.org/donate
Bloomberg News Sept. 11 Defendants Press for Right to Waterboarding Talk
Bloomberg Businessweek
News From Bloomberg
Sept. 11 Defendants Press for Right to Waterboarding Talk
By David Lerman on October 16, 2012
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-10-16/sept-dot-11-defendants-press-for-right-to-waterboarding-talk
Lawyers for Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four other accused plotters of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks asked a military judge to reject secrecy rules they said would prevent public disclosure of details about “waterboarding” and other CIA interrogation techniques the defendants experienced.
“You cannot classify an observation and experience of the accused, particularly when it was imposed on them against their will,” David Nevin, Mohammed’s chief counsel, said yesterday, the second day of preliminary hearings at the U.S. naval station in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
With a trial of the Sept. 11 defendants before a military judge and jury still a year or more away, lawyers for the five men have filed a barrage of motions seeking to define or expand the legal rights they will be afforded as they attempt to air grievances about their treatment in captivity.
Defense lawyers for the five men said the government’s proposed protective order governing the handling of classified information is too broad and would prevent them from effectively representing their clients.
Joanna Baltes, a prosecuting attorney, said the proposed protective order is almost identical to one often used in federal courts. She said the government wants the order approved to guard against “potential disclosures that could be harmful to national security.”
Army Colonel James Pohl, the military judge, recessed the hearing day without ruling on the issue.
The consideration of how to handle sensitive information in the biggest terrorism case in U.S. history coincided with a ruling questioning the credibility of military tribunals.
- David Slesinger's blog
- Read more
- Login to post comments
Was Osama for Real? And Was He Killed in 2001?
ABSTRACT: Some sceptics believe Osama was not behind 9/11 and may have been framed. This article argues that Osama was in on the game since the beginning, and that the Bin Laden family might be members of the Global Elite. For the first time ever, this article also pieces together a theory that has been gaining traction in Pakistan since the assassination of Benazir Bhutto. That Osama was killed around December 2001 by a “rogue” MI-6 operative named Omar Saeed Shaikh, in an act of vigilantism . Sadly, Saeed did not get to claim the $25 million bounty on Osama’s head. Instead he got framed for the mysterious murder of reporter Daniel Pearl, who was preparing to tell the world about Saeed’s wondrous feat.
Abu Zubaydah Poses a Real Threat to al Qaeda
Abu Zubaydah, a man once called al-Qaeda’s “chief of operations” appears to be at the center of an unraveling of the official myth behind al Qaeda. After his capture in early 2002, Zubaydah was the first “detainee” known to be tortured. The information allegedly obtained from his torture played a large part in the creation of the official account of 9/11 and in the justification for the continued use of such torture techniques. Yet in September, 2009, the U.S. government admitted that Zubaydah was never a member or associate of al Qaeda at all. These facts raise an alarming number of questions about the veracity of our knowledge about al Qaeda, and the true identity of the people who are said to be behind the 9/11 attacks.
Unlike other alleged al Qaeda leaders, including Khlaid Sheik Mohammed and Rasmi bin Alshibh, Zubaydah has never been charged with a crime. As these other leading suspects await their continually-postponed military trial, Zubaydah is instead being airbrushed out of history. Why would the U.S. government want us to forget Zubaydah, the first and most important al Qaeda operative captured after 9/11?