January 2013

(For a historical archive of our old site visit http://911blogger.com/archive)

Who Says You Can Kill Americans, Mr. President?

" PRESIDENT OBAMA has refused to tell Congress or the American people why he believes the Constitution gives, or fails to deny, him the authority to secretly target and kill American citizens who he suspects are involved in terrorist activities overseas. So far he has killed three that we know of.

Presidents had never before, to our knowledge, targeted specific Americans for military strikes. There are no court decisions that tell us if he is acting lawfully. Mr. Obama tells us not to worry, though, because his lawyers say it is fine, because experts guide the decisions and because his advisers have set up a careful process to help him decide whom he should kill."

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/17/opinion/who-says-you-can-kill-americans-mr-president.html?emc=eta1&_r=0

The Moral Decoding of 9/11 by John Mcmurtry

The Supreme Value System and Strategic Plan for World Rule

I was sceptical of the 9/11 events from the first time I saw the reel of it. It was on every major network within minutes. All the guilty parties were declared before any evidence was shown. The first questions of any criminal investigation were erased. Who had the most compelling motives for the event? Who alone had the means to explode two central icon buildings in New York into ashes and molten metal in seconds?1

Others questions soon arose in the aftermath. Why was all the evidence at the crime scenes removed or confiscated on the spot? Who was behind the continuous false information and non-stop repetition of ‘foreign/Arab terrorists’ when no proof of guilt existed? Who was blocking all independent inquiry?

Even 11 years on these questions are still not answered.

............

DOJ Refuses to Disclose How it Tracks Citizens Using GPS

"Following the pattern set by the National Security Agency (NSA), the Justice Department last week refused to disclose how, when, and how often the federal government uses GPS to track vehicles.

As a result of a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) petition filed last July, on January 16 the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) received two internal Justice Department memos setting out the department’s policies regarding tracking of citizens using GPS technology.

At least that’s what the documents purported to reveal. In reality, the pair of memos sent to the ACLU by the DOJ were largely blacked out, leaving all but the barest of background information completely redacted.

As is customary among the participants in the government project to place every American under constant surveillance and make every citizen a suspect, Justice Department attorneys argue that the information requested by the ACLU in the FOIA petition could be used to help criminals escape capture by law enforcement.

The ACLU isn’t convinced, however.

What Zero Dark Thirty gets wrong about Guantánamo lawyers

"In the continuing controversy over the treatment of torture in Zero Dark Thirty, a crucial scene has been overlooked – one that makes the film’s point of view clear, even if it’s less attention-grabbing than images of waterboarding. The scene comes late in the movie, after the CIA has surmised that Osama bin Laden is possibly hiding in Abbottabad, Pakistan. One government official wonders aloud whether a Guantánamo detainee might be able to confirm that location, to which a CIA operative replies, “Who the hell am I supposed to ask, some guy in Gitmo who’s all lawyered up?” He explains that any lawyer will simply tip off al-Qaeda.

Defense lawyers are used to being portrayed in the media as morally questionable hired guns, while their police and prosecutorial counterparts play committed heroes who avenge victims and put the bad guys away. Even in the left-leaning HBO series The Wire, which broke the mold of the police procedural, the main defense attorney unscrupulously helps gangsters hide criminal activity, while the head prosecutor is accurately described on Wikipedia as one of the show’s “most morally upright figures.”

AE911Truth "The Blueprint" Monthly Newsletter | January 2013

AE911Truth Newsletter Vol. XXXX


Newsletter not displaying correctly? View it on
our website
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth / Blueprint Newsletter
AE911Truth Blueprint Newsletter | Vol. XXXX | January 2013 

January newsletter banner


AE911Truth faxes 12,000 police chiefs and sheriffs across the U.S. and needs your help to follow up; The official report from the landmark Toronto 9/11 Hearings is now available; AE911Truth volunteers and activists bring the 9/11 evidence to a major civil liberties conference; Did Larry Silverstein admit to authorizing the controlled demolition of WTC7?

Contents

• 12,000 Police Chiefs Across the US Alerted About 9/11

      WTC Demolition Evidence

• The Toronto Hearings Report Now Available

• AE911Truth Activists Enlighten Civil Liberties Conference

• FAQ #10: Did WTC 7 Owner Larry Silverstein Admit to

      Ordering the Controlled Demolition of the Building?

• Debunking The Real 9/11 Myths: Why Popular

      Mechanics Can’t Face Up To Reality – Part 8

• New Planned Giving Opportunities!

9/11 Free Fall 1/17/13-- 9/11 Truth and the Union of Concerned Scientists

Yaz and Omar are the two activists behind Citizens Aware and Asking-- a letter writing campaign urging The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) to provide the public with an honest evaluation of the recent scientific evidence which sheds new light on the events of September 11, 2001. This emerged as a result of an interesting (to the say the least) response from the UCS after Yaz asked the panel at one of its conferences a question regarding AE911Truth's controlled demolition evidence. In this episode they discuss their campaign with Andy Steele.

www.citizensawareandasking.org

*****

Previous episodes:

9/11 Free Fall 1/10/13-- Interview with Dr. Andre Rousseau

http://www.911freefall.com/2013/01/911-free-fall-11013-interview-with-dr.html

Philip Jarman, speaking truth in the post-9/11 world

http://www.911freefall.com/2013/01/philip-jarman-speaking-truth-in-post.html

Lupe Fiasco Thrown Off Stage At Inaugural Concert

Score one for truth, justice and accountability.

"At the Obama inauguration party Lupe Fiasco opened his set with his 2011 single “Words I never Said,” in which he criticizes Obama for the president’s silence after the bombing of the Gaza strip. He rapped the song over and over again for more than 20 minutes. “Limbaugh is a racist, Glenn is a racist, Gaza strip was getting bombed, Obama didn’t say s---,” he continually rhymed.

The rapper also criticizes the War on Terror and questions the Sept. 11 attacks in the song, asking “9/11, building seven, did they really pull it?”



After a staff member approached the performer to ask him to change songs, the rapper continued with his lyrics and his mic got cut, the lights were dimmed, but his band played on and so did he.  When Lupe Fiasco refused to stop, several bouncers confronted the rapper with their backs turned to the audience. He was eventually forced to leave the stage to the outrage of much of the audience".

RSS