May 2013

(For a historical archive of our old site visit http://911blogger.com/archive)

Philip Mudd (Former CIA/FBI) passes on question about WTC 7 free-fall

Philip Mudd on C-SPAN's Washington Journal program refuses to address my question about the free-fall acceleration of WTC 7 acknowledged by NIST. 5/12/13

http://youtu.be/AHaF0H8zmcM

9/11 Free Fall 5/9/13-- Massimo Mazzucco

Massimo Mazzucco is an award winning filmmaker, screenwriter and journalist. He is arguably one of the foremost 9/11 "truthers" in Italy. His website is Luogocomune.net,-- a news website that grew out of his investigation of 9/11. Currently the website covers all the most important issues at stake in the new millennium, from Big Pharma to world economics...alternative energy to the attacks on civil liberties.

In this episode he talks with Andy Steele about the real 9/11 crime and the how he believes perception of the issue by the public and media will change over time.

September 11 Conspiracy Theories Questionnaire

As part of my schooling in Year 12 @ Minlaton District School, Minlaton, South Australia, Australia, i am currently in a subject called research project. in this subject my main task is focused on Conspiracy Theories and September 11 specifically. As part of my research i am required to gain primary research. as part of my primary research i have made a questionnaire about the conspiracies behind September 11 and the truth behind the publicised story behind the event etc.
if you would be willing to help me out, reach me at;
Jesse.Bertoldi986@schools.sa.edu.au

Many Thanks!
JBertoldi_17

JFK-RFK-MLK??? The Questions Remain By Russ Baker on May 9, 2013

http://whowhatwhy.com/2013/05/09/jfk-rfk-mlk-the-questions-remain/

JFK-RFK-MLK??? The Questions Remain

bushWait for the Fiftieth, they said. Oboy!

The half-century mark since the assassination of John F Kennedy was supposed to be some kind of event. Lots of books were in the offing. Broadcasters were primed. We were going to get some really huge revelations, some kind of major step forward in coming to terms with this event that has so affected America and so divided its population.

"An Inconvenient Outburst" - challenging the dominant narrative in Syria

The following is to be found on the BBC website: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-22456106

Syria sarin row - an inconvenient outburst by Mark Urban

"Statements by UN investigator Carla del Ponte that she had, "strong, concrete suspicions, but not yet incontrovertible proof" that Syrian rebels may have used the nerve gas sarin have produced some interesting responses.

They are reminiscent of some earlier conflicts where those who sought engagement on one side or the other wanted to portray the protagonists in simple good-versus-evil terms.

White House spokesman Jay Carney insisted Ms Del Ponte was wrong, and that the Assad regime was probably guilty of using such weapons, although the US has still not reached a definitive conclusion on the matter.

The US position is a complex one to be sure, since it requires Mr Carney and others to sound dismissive of the idea that the Syrian opposition might have done such a thing, while not stating with complete certainty that the government was guilty, lest such a conclusion be seen to demand action under the "red lines" previously formulated by President Barack Obama.

Letter to the Hartford Courant Re- 9/11 Truth "Anti American Hate Speech"

Hartford Courant: Scrub 9/11 Graffiti : Is it possible that the state of Connecticut could use some of that $500 million from the Ctfastrak project and throw some coats of paint on the bridge supports that run through downtown Hartford? I'm sick and tired of driving by underpasses and seeing "9/11 Truth" graffiti. The good citizens of Connecticut deserve better than seeing anti-American hate speech rubbed in their face every day.
http://www.courant.com/news/opinion/letters/hcrs-14774hc--20130504,0,5791172.story

Friends of 9/11 Blogger - What are your thoughts re- this letter found in the Hartford Courant May 6, 2013?
Is 9/11 Truth anti American, is 9/11 Truth hate speech?

DHS Whistleblower Says War On Terror Is A Charade

Julia Davis, a former Customs and Border Protections Officer, was falsely declared a domestic terrorist and subjected to retaliatory efforts against her by the Department of Homeland Security. Her home was raided by a 27 man “special response team.” She was twice falsely arrested and imprisoned, but later exonerated. She is now a national security expert and has put out a historical documentary titled Top Priority: The Terror Within. She claims that the War On Terror by the Department of Homeland Security is a charade and that the agency seems to be targeting concerned American patriots.

Read more: http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/05/dhs-whistleblower-says-war-on-terror-is-a-charade-real-targets-are-american-patriots/#ix...

Freedom Outpost
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=feHbP4k_tdk

I Have A Question About The NSA And 9/11


"You can do an investigation, and if you don't really want to research an area, you just don't look at it. If you don't ask them all of the questions, or you don't let them tell you the whole story, ya know... then you can write a report based on half-truths." - 9/11 Family Member, September Eleventh Advocate, "Jersey Girl" Mindy Kleinberg

Source: www.cindysheehanssoapbox.com

Jon Gold
5/1/2013
Updated: 5/5/2013

Hopefully, you remember the time right after 9/11. A time when we were told repeatedly that there were absolutely no warnings, and that no one had any idea something like that could happen. If not, feel free to browse the "9/11 Denials" section available at www.historycommons.org.

Radio interview on 22 April 2013, challenging the official 9/11 narrative

Two weeks ago, I spoke on a radio show regarding 9/11 – providing evidence that strongly challenges the official 9/11 narrative. Perhaps a quick outline of topics discussed/prepared for will be helpful – note that I spoke about much more than the WTC demolitions. I think this is important. (Summary of main points; not necessarily in the order followed on the radio show.)

0. Define the official narrative: A – There is no cover-up of 9/11 facts by gov't”; B-”the evil of that day was ONLY by Al Qaeda; there were no explosives in WTC towers or WTC7.” The radio interviewer and his studio guest Martin Tanner declared their support of the official story at the beginning.

1. Gov't cover-up/lies about the WTC dust danger: "WASHINGTON (AP) -- At the White House's direction, the Environmental Protection Agency gave New Yorkers misleading assurances that there was no health risk from the debris-laden air after the World Trade Center collapse, according to an internal inquiry.

RSS