Interview 822 – Richard Gage Takes ReThink 9/11 Across Canada

Posted by Corbett

Podcast: http://www.corbettreport.com/mp3/2014-02-10%20Richard%20Gage.mp3

Richard Gage, AIA, founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth joins us today to talk about the ReThink 9/11 campaign that is seeking to refocus the public’s attention on the crimes of September 11, 2001 and their cover up. As part of the ongoing campaign, ReThink911.ca is putting on a cross-Canada tour of speaking engagements featuring Richard Gage’s keynote presentation, “9/11: Blueprint for Truth.” Today we talk to Gage about the tour and its importance to Canada and the world.

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2014/02/5-minute-video-us-leaders-joke-obvious-war-crimes-war-lies-war-murders-arrest.html

In this 5-minute video, Presidents Bush and Obama, Secretary of State and presidential-hopeful Ms. Clinton, presidential-hopeful has-been John McCain, and former Secretary of State and Bush family friend James Baker all joke about:

Radio Interview: http://www.radio4all.net/index.php/program/73991

Summary: Cheryl interviews AZ, the producer and director of the film "9/11 in the Academic Community". This provocative film explores the consequences of discussing the evidence of 9/11 and how it's a taboo subject on university campuses.
This film may open the way for a more open discourse on the subject of 9/11 and the overwhelming body of research that contradicts the official narrative. The film will be shown at the Univ. of Hartford in the Auerbach Auditorium, in Hillyer Hall at 7:00 PM on Jan. 29, 2014. It's free and a discuss will follow the film.

Direct Link: http://www.radio4all.net/files/cheryl@ct911truth.org/4212-1-ADNAN_INTERVIEW.mp3

http://911inacademia.com/

Did you know 2013 was a breakthrough year in our efforts to hold NIST accountable?

For years we have known that Building 7 came down in free-fall and that the NIST report failed to explain why. We knew that NIST’s collapse model looked nothing like the actual collapse, and that NIST’s “probable collapse sequence” was anything but probable.

But in 2013, NIST’s explanation went from highly improbable to absolutely impossible, thanks to the discovery that NIST deliberately omitted critical structural features from its model – features that make the supposed collapse initiation impossible. With this new discovery, we have the evidence to prove definitively that Building 7 could not have collapsed as NIST says it did.