August 2014

(For a historical archive of our old site visit http://911blogger.com/archive)

Putting a 9/11 Mystery on the Ballot By Russ Baker on Aug 14, 2014

.
http://whowhatwhy.com/2014/08/14/putting-a-911-mystery-on-the-ballot/

Putting a 9/11 Mystery on the Ballot

By Russ Baker on Aug 14, 2014

123I was standing blocks from Building 7 of the World Trade Center complex and staring directly at it when it collapsed.

Working for the Los Angeles Times, I had arrived at the World Trade Center as the South and North Tower were making their rapid and deadly descents in the morning. That afternoon, I called in a series of reports to a staffer in the New York bureau.

I was literally on the phone with the office at 5:21 p.m., describing the fires burning in the structure as the building began—and completed— its remarkably fast, smooth descent to the ground. I described the building neatly pancaking, and the Pulitzer Prize winner on the other end taking my dictation declared: “That sounds like a controlled demolition.”
Controlled Demolition

Controlled Demolition

Ben Swann.com- 6 Reasons To Question and Investigate 9/11 on the 13th Anniversary- By: Derrick Broze Aug 11, 2014

.
http://benswann.com/6-reasons-to-question-and-investigate-911-on-the-13th-anniversary/

6 Reasons To Question and Investigate 9/11 on the 13th Anniversary

By: Derrick Broze Aug 11, 2014

“In the course of our investigation into the national response to the attacks, the 9/11 Commission staff discovered that the official version of what had occurred (the morning of September 11, 2001) – that is, what government and military officials had told Congress, the Commission, the media and the public about who knew what when – was almost entirely, and inexplicably untrue.”
- John Farmer, senior counsel to the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States

A Coalition for Major Outreach This 9/11 Anniversary

.
http://www.groundzero911.com/

A Coalition for Major Outreach This 9/11 Anniversary

GroundZero911.com aims to provide activists with 9/11 Anniversary event information as well as the tools necessary for public outreach.

Our goal is to encourage anyone that believes we need a new investigation into the events surrounding September 11th, 2001 to come to New York City for the Anniversary.

This movement was started by the victims' family members who had questions. Their loved ones were murdered and they've never been given answers. It's time to demand those answers, to unite together to demand justice. Let's make history this September 11th by coming together in New York City in hopes of the justice we've all been fighting for. Please also check out our Twitter, Facebook, and Facebook Event Page.

General Synopsis of the 9/11 Anniversary:

Why Do Good People Become Silent—or Worse-About 9/11? Part 9: Brain Research, Part 2 – Moral Psychology

http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/909-why-do-good-people-become-silentor-worseabout-911-part-9-brain-r...

Why Do Good People Become Silent—or Worse-About 9/11? Part 9: Brain Research, Part 2 – Moral Psychology
Written by Frances Shure, M.A., L.P.C.
Friday, 08 August 2014

Summary/Editor’s Note: Frances Shure, M.A., L.P.C., has performed an in-depth analysis addressing a key issue of our time: “Why Do Good People Become Silent—or Worse—About 9/11?” The resulting essay, being presented here as a series, is a synthesis of both academic research and clinical observations.

In answering the question in the title of this essay, last month’s segment, Part 8, reported on some of the brain research that shows we humans have differences in our brain structures, and these differences help explain why some of us are more open to new ideas and can handle ambiguity better than others. Additionally, the research, which demonstrates the brain’s tenacious hold on belief, despite contrary evidence, helps us understand why the task of educating people about 9/11 becomes as much psychological as it is evidence-based.

NSA Lied About Knowledge Of 2 9/11 Hijackers In U.S., Didn't Inform The FBI

By Jon Gold
8/9/2014

For a long time now, I've been trying to figure out just exactly what the NSA knew about the hijackers and 9/11.

The main reason for this was because the 9/11 Commission barely looked at them, and the information they did come across tried to tie Iran to Al-Qaeda and 9/11. "[For executive director Philip] Zelikow and other staff on the commission, it was just more interesting—sexier—to concentrate on the CIA."

In late 2003, the NSA will allow the 9/11 Commission access to its archives on Al-Qaeda. "[P]erversely, the more eager [NSA director] General Hayden was to cooperate, the less interested [9/11 Commission executive director Philip] Zelikow and others at the commission seemed to be in what was buried in the NSA files."

Towards the end of the 9/11 Commission, "Zelikow would later admit he too was worried that important classified information had never been reviewed at the NSA and elsewhere in the government before the 9/11 commission shut its doors, that critical evidence about bin Laden’s terrorist network sat buried in government files, unread to this day. By July 2004, it was just too late to keep digging."

Interesting, since he seems to be the main reason the 9/11 Commission stayed away from the NSA.

Once again, the City has said "No" to tens of thousands of voters. But this time, we will prevail.

http://highrisesafetynyc.org/ August 7, 2014

Once again, the City has said "No" to tens of thousands of voters.

But this time, we will prevail.

Dear friends,

On July 3, 2014, we submitted over 67,000 petition signatures calling for a ballot measure that would require the City of New York to investigate the collapse of WTC 7 and any future high-rise collapses. Most unfortunately, but also as we anticipated and prepared for, the City has attempted to block the High-Rise Safety Initiative from appearing on the ballot this November.

On Monday, we received the City Clerk's certificate, which claims first that the petition has only 27,892 valid signatures, 2,108 less than the 30,000 threshold; and second that the proposed charter amendment is legally invalid for three reasons, which are discussed below.

HOW CONSPIRACY THEORIES POSE A NATIONAL SECURITY RISK- Washington Journal Aug 6, 2014

.
HOW CONSPIRACY THEORIES POSE A NATIONAL SECURITY RISK

Published on Aug 6, 2014

August 05, 2014 CNN http://MOXNews.com

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUBS9KeWGTo

What Happened to the WTC Gold on 9/11? corbettreport. August 4

.
What Happened to the WTC Gold on 9/11?
corbettreport http://www.corbettreport.com/what-happened-to-the-wtc-gold-on-911/

Podcast: http://www.corbettreport.com/?powerpress_pinw=11655-podcast

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3f2U75qCZo

http://www.corbettreport.com/what-happened-to-the-wtc-gold-on-911/

What Happened to the WTC Gold on 9/11?

In this edition of “Questions For Corbett” James answers questions on his new Federal Reserve documentary, the eugenics agenda, Christine Lagarde’s numerology, ebola, BRICS and much more.

SHOW NOTES
Mutual Credit, the Astonishingly Simple Truth about Money Creation

Self-Issued Credit: A Monetary Solution

Fractional Reserve Banking: How to Create and Destroy Money

The Great Contraction

Episode 067 – The 9/11 Money Trail

Precious Metals in WTC 4 Vault: Only a Fraction Recovered?

Cache of Gold Found at WTC Two truckloads retrieved through a tunnel in rubble

The Anglo-American Establishment by Carroll Quigley

Obama: 'We Tortured Some Folks' After 9/11 And We Have To Take Responsibility For It

8/2/14 Saturday News Dump: Barack Obama

"I was very clear that in the immediate aftermath of 9/11, we did some things that were wrong," he said. "We did a whole lot of things that were right, but we tortured some folks. We did some things that were contrary to our values."

"We crossed the line and that needs to be understood and accepted. And we have to, as a country, take responsibility for that so we don't do it in the future," he added.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/obama-we-tortured-some-folks-after-911/

 

NIST admits they omitted lateral support beams from WTC 7 report

In a letter dated July 11, 2014 to Senator Barbara Boxer of California, Jim Schufreider, representing NIST, admitted (albeit indirectly) for the first time that NIST omitted the lateral support beams in its final report on WTC 7, published after a 7 year investigation + delay in November, 2008.

Unfortunately Mr. Schufreider's letter to Senator Boxer made false statements and misrepresentations, probably in an effort to deceive the Senator so as to avoid meaningful oversight. To this day the question remains open whether NIST fulfilled its Congressional mandate in the National Construction Safety Team Act.

On October 1, 2002 the National Construction Safety Team Act (Public Law 107-231) was signed into law by President George W. Bush. The first "specific objective" of this Act was, "1. Determine why and how WTC 1 and WTC 2 collapsed following the initial impacts of the aircraft and why and how WTC 7 collapsed." (NIST NCSTAR 1A, page xxvii).

RSS