art bell's lame 9/11 show

i stayed up last night from midnight til 4am to listen to the head researcher of the recent popular mechanics article be interviewed by art bell on 'coast to coast'..

after 3 1/2 hours of going over the article, and talking down about anyone and everyone, there was 30 minutes of actual discussion.. i was blown away by the incredibly biased conversation that i sat through.. they received a call at the begining by Lisa Guliani, she asked a great question, but art said chertoff wasnt on the line yet, and never brought her question up to chertoff..

of the few callers who did get in, a few asked decent questions, or made decent comments.. and to those chertoff said they hadnt researched it.. it was quite apparent that asside from the 16 points in the article (that they spent 3 1/2 hours going over), they had little to no knowledge of anything else, including the 6-8 highjackers who are still alive.. they had never heard of that, and doubted its credibility, showing they really dont know much in the great scope of 9/11 oddities.

is a storm brewin?

ust got hit with some links (thanks phil) that are pretty interesting.. art bell, whom i think most ppl have heard of, is having the 'senior researcher' Ben Chertoff on his show tonight (3/5/2005)..

Christopher Bollyn from American Free Press apparently has been hawking on Chertoff, 'head researcher' of the Popular Mechanics article 'debunking' the major myths of 9/11..

here are the links:
9/11 AND CHERTOFF: COUSIN WROTE 9/11 PROPAGANDA FOR PM
WILL ART BELL ASK BEN CHERTOFF ABOUT HIS TIES TO DHS?

AUESOME video on PNAC

wow.. i got a link last night to this video, and it is really really impressive.. the graphics in it are free-flowing vector graphis, and its focus is on the war on terrorism, PNAC, and the motives for wanting war..

this is just a great video, impressive stuff:

'Media ignore 9/11 questions' article

timesargus.com article

Why has the journalistic community chosen to downplay the latest 9/11 Commission Report?
..
It's the media who need to raise the heat on this matter, Why haven't they? It seems as if most of the journalists today are either scared cowards, frauds, or paid for by the administration, which is to say corporate conglomerate ownership. It's confusing and downright frightening.

This is just one example. There are so many. What has gone awry with the media? I'm perplexed, confused, and worried.

feds backdown on re-classified info

welp, its been a few days since my last post.. so i figured i would make a quick post on a few things of interest..

first off, a law suit revolving around two briefings which were classified after they were already public record has been settled.. the arguement was that the feds improperly claimed national security to re-classify the information, when in actuality they were just trying to coverup things that made them look bad..
911citizenswatch.org

free dvd offer about to wrap up

the guys over at reopen911.org sent out an email letting me know they are about to wrap up their free dvd offer.. this guy Jimmy Walter has invested close to 3 million trying to spread the word about the lies and coverup surrounding 9/11.. he is giving away free dvd's, so go order yourself a copy before they go off to manufacturing..

click here for a free dvd on 9/11
-----

article in the latimes about 9/11

here is an article in the LA Times about the newly released FAA warnings.. I love how the media is constantly berating the FAA for not following up on the warnings when the warnings obviously would have come from some other intelligence agency, not the FAA.
latimes.com

there is some aditional commentary here:
911citizenswatch.org

here is the commentary:

Increasing numbers now believe that based on mounting credible evidence it goes beyond the criminal negligence suggested here by Robert Scheer. Evidence from whistleblowers and others ignored by the Commission now demands that Americans and the world at least seriously consider the possibility of willful criminal complicity by individuals with vested interests within the U.S. government or by U.S. government contractors who stood to gain immensely (and did) from the attack. Instead of these individuals being investigated or held responsible they have been let off the hook or in many cases given promotions and rewards for their 'incompetence' or 'criminal negligence'.

new madrid fire image

this image goes without words:

more pics from last night
-----

madrid skyscraper on fire

there is a 32 story skyscraper in madrid on fire. a few of the top floors collapsed onto the lower floors, but the building is still standing.

this building appears to have no 'core'.. hopefully this building will stand and no further destruction will occur. luckily noone was in the building.

compare this building to WTC7 which fully collapsed:

-----

a quick comment on the FAA warnings

while the media is covering the 50+ warnings ignored by the FAA prior to 9/11 they are still missing the larger point.. that despite these massive warnings they failed to follow standard operating procedure in notifying NORAD to respond to planes that deviated from their plotted course.

in the year prior to 9/11 67 flights deviated from course and were intercepted by fighter jets within 10-15 minutes. on 9/11, even after the first tower was struck, the FAA and NORAD failed to follow the S.O.P. they had followed perfectly well the entire year.. what the media has done is blatantly ignored this discussion, and have confused the average person about what it takes to intercept versus what it takes to shoot-down an errant plane.. these planes should have been intercepted, without question.. the media and talking heads of the FAA and NORAD will confuse you about getting clearance for shooting down the planes when the real question is about interception, something that is a routine action both before and after 9/11.