Thanks to The Professional for this:
Are You Sure Laughing at Conspiracy Theories Makes You Smart?
There are always really wacky or just plain factually challenged theories , and they never help either (which raises potential questions about the origins of those ideas). The only thing that matters, though, to the Conspiracy-mockers is the question: Does the Conspiracy Theory reflect badly on their beloved America (the concept, not the place or the people)? And this is crucial. If so, it is rejected out of hand as mere â€œanti-Americanism.â€ If the Conspiracy Theory, on the other hand, reflects well on their beloved America (the concept, not the place or the people), it gets the reverse treatment: blind and complete acceptance.
9-11 Probers Leave Questions Behind - Power Plays Blog
The private watchdog group formed by the former members of the 9-11 Commission is closing up shop. The announcement of its last media eventâ€”a December 5 briefing where the 9-11 Discourse Project "will issue its final assessment of progress on all 9/11 Commission recommendations"â€”came today. This is no surprise: The project (funded by entities like the Carnegie Corporation, the Drexel Family Foundation, and the Rockefeller Brothers Fund) was intended to last for just a year after the commission expired in August 2004, its mission to "educate the public on the issue of terrorism and what can be done to make the country safer." But even if this end was long planned, it doesn't mean everyone thinks the job is finished.
Barrie Zwicker's The Great Conspiracy - The 9/11 News Special You Never Saw is available through Google's video search. The quality is pretty high, and it appears to be the full length.
You can watch it here.
Be sure to check it out if you haven't before, and do some searches for other 9/11 videos as well.
Look what happens when you read the academic paper questioning the official version of the collapse of the three World Trade Center buildings that Brigham Young University physics professor Steven E. Jones recently posted at physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html.
Jones is an honest-to-goodness scientist whose specialties are metal-catalyzed fusion, solar energy and something called archaeometry. The 9,000-word abstract, part of a 2006 book called "The Hidden History of 9/11/2001," asks, "Why Indeed did the WTC Buildings Collapse?"
I've been going through some issues related to massive bandwidth usage over the last 2 days. Out of the blue we sent out 30-40GB of transfers in the last 2 days.
I am in the process of moving the server to a new host, so the next few days may be bumpy, but will pay off in the long term. With our new server we will have 15x the bandwidth, and 14x the storage.
Sorry for the downtime, it will all be straightened out soon enough.
There has never been a steel frame building that has ever collapsed as a result of fire. There have been numerous steel buildings that have had severe fires that burned for several hours but the buildings never collapsed. The towers were built to withstand 160 mile winds and the crash of a 707, a plane not much smaller than a 767. They were also heavily imbued with asbestos, a fire retardant. The South Tower collapsed at 9:59 AM after being hit at 9:03 AM (56 minutes). The North Tower collapsed at 10:28 AM after being hit at 8:46 AM (1 hour, 42 minutes).
Philanthropist Jimmy Walter Presents:
The New Pearl Harbor - Confronting the Evidence
Press Conference in Tampa to Launch a Genuine 9/11 Investigation, December
6th, 10:00AM, Don Vincente De Ybor Hotel
WHO: 9/11 experts Jimmy Walter, Morgan Reynolds, David Von Kleist, William Rodriguez, Joyce Riley, and Eric Hufschmid.
WHAT: A Real Investigation into What Happened on September 11, 2001.
This forum is an investigation into the following:
1. Why the Bush administration ignored warning signs about terrorist attacks.
2. Why they leaked classified information to the media.
3. Why members of the administration lied under oath and obstructed justice in an investigation about national security violations.
Spectacular article with loads of information in a small package. Touches on Operation Northwoods, Reichstag, fake terror, and the leaked memo discussing the need for a new terror attack to bolster support.
This article is great to open new eyes, spread it around, follow the link to get the whole article including all hyperlinks:
But could this happen in modern America? Initially, it is now fairly well-accepted that the Gulf of Tonkin Incident was a fabrication. See this article.
Bush administration Labor Dept. economist, Dr. Morgan Reynolds, and Eric Hufschmid, author of "Painful Questions", spell out clearly the evidence proving 9-11 was done by our government and agents from Israel.
Got a heads up tonight that Indira Singh recently did an interview with Michael Corbin on a radio show called 'A Closer Look' out of Colorado. I haven't had a chance to listen to the nearly 3 hour interview so I will just post the summary off of 4acloserlook.com:
1st and 2nd Hour:
Michael interviews Indira Singh, a whistleblower on 9/11. Indira links some very important facts in her investigation that leads to disturbing conclusions about who was behind 9/11 and why.
Here is a link to their download page:
Cory You sent in this strip today, thought it was pretty impressive art and worth sharing. You can check out his site at neoramen.com.
I had a few emails back and forth with him and it sounds like he would be more than willing to do more comics on the subject in the future. If any of y
Given the past few weeks' exciting news regarding Able Danger, and Professor Steven E. Jones, people have been starting to ask questions about what happened on that fateful day. We at 911Truth.org would like to ask anyone within the media, specifically, the "Friendly Media", Mike Malloy, Alex Jones, etc... to please contact us for interviews so we can inform people what it is they can do to help.
It is so amazing how much is being said lately about 9/11 each and every week. What is even more amazing is how the mainstream media continues to ignore the 9/11 elephant in the room. When I first started this blog I was worried that covering only new 9/11 related news would be to narrow a scope to be consistent, guess I was wrong.
So, kick back, relax, and catch up on a ton of 9/11 related stuff from this week.
Here is a bit more about Tucker Carlson's interview with the physics professor who put forth a paper claiming explosives were used to destroy the WTC on 9/11... just prior to the professor's appearance on Carlson's program, Tucker's guest was someone from the Weekly Standard (this guy was a regular guest).
Its been an incredible week, hopefully someone will pick up the torch:
The BYU professor, who thinks explosions most likely brought down the twin towers, is now limiting his media appearances to only 'peer reviews.' Read his last words to the media here in the Arctic Beacon.
The BYU physics professor who thinks explosions brought down the WTC said Wednesday he's "bowing out of the limelight" and limiting his media appearances to only academic peer reviews.
Conservative Professor Steven E. Jones has been barraged by media appearances since releasing a 19 page paper last week, saying "pre-positioned explosives" most likely brought down the twin WTC towers as well as WTC No. 7.
It has been a long couple of nights for me and others waiting up 'til the crack of dawn to report on Tucker's latest statements. So tonight I'm going to catch up on some things, and leave the reporting up to you guys.
Send in your comments and new articles and later tonight I'll post a grab bag of your submissions and a few email submissions I've received as well.
Tonight Tucker Carlson played one voicemail from a caller who thought he was wrong in his slander of Jones, and another from a FDNY firefighter who thought he was right, and that Steven Jones was a 'quack'. Tucker then said that 'he knew' that Steven Jones was 'a quack', and that 'it is because of people like you that I had qualms about that story in the first place, people who lived through that day' (referring to the FDNY caller).
Tucker Carlson is either as silly as his bow tie would indicate, or he's looking for a way to expose the truth behind 9/11. Today he posted "9/11 Theorist Clearly Hits A Nerve," regarding public response to his Monday night show with BYU Professor, Steven Jones.
Carlson first insinuates Jones is "insane," then accuses him of being unable to articulate his hypothesis, calling him "an epically bad guest." Apparently, Jones was expected to clearly articulate the hypothesis presented in a 26-page scientific paper in six minutes, minus Carlson's repeated interruptions promoting the official line. (Let's also not forget that 'The Situation' refused to show footage of the WTC7 collapse, which would have essentially made the case despite Carlson's best attempts to prevent Jones from doing so.)
Tonight on Tucker Carlson's 'The Situation', Tucker responded to calls he received stating that Steven Jones was not given enough time on last night's show by stating:
[referring to the caller]your one of dozens, scores, maybe hundreds of people who called and wrote after our segment last night..
9/11 and Internet credibility - By Mary Maxwell, Ph.D.
How long must we wait to judge the validity of the September 11th conspiracy theories that have floated around on the Internet for years? I believe there is a way to grant status and authority to the many excellent reports and analyses whose only sin is that they appear in electronic form instead of newsprint. Moreover, we should start this process right away. After all, if our government is behaving maliciously, we need to know it, communicate it to others, and act on it with urgency. This will require that we make judgments about September 11th now and not wait for 'perfect proof.'
Unfortunately the interview was relatively quick at just 6 minutes, and Jones' did not use his short time as best as possible to highlight the points of his recent paper to the American public.
In The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 9/11, I summarized dozens of facts and reports that cast doubt on the official story about 9/11. Then in The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions, I discussed the way these various facts and reports were treated by the 9/11 Commission, namely, by distorting or simply omitting them. I have also taken this big-picture approach, with its cumulative argument, in my previous essays and lectures on 9/11. This approach, which shows every aspect of the official story to be problematic, provides the most effective challenge to the official story.
A rumor is floating around that Steven Jones will be on Tucker Carlson's show tonight at 11:15pm EST.
I am guessing this rumor will prove to be untrue, but keep an eye out.. Hopefully I'm wrong.
I am told that Jones contacted Griffin and told him to let us all know, and that is where this rumor came from. I pray this is correct.
EDIT: The video can be found here.