For those interested, the manufacturers of our shirts are offering a special deal for 'black friday' (11/25) which randomly gives you $5, $10, $25, or $100 off your purchase.
Just click on the 911Blogger shirts link on the left panel (or click here) and when you check out enter in the code '328VUDW'.
Be sure to check out the 'Pentagon words' shirt, it is a great way to start a discussion about 9/11.
Here is a summary of the newly discovered PDB from September 21st:
Ten days after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, President Bush was told in a highly classified briefing that the U.S. intelligence community had no evidence linking the Iraqi regime of Saddam Hussein to the attacks and that there was scant credible evidence that Iraq had any significant collaborative ties with Al Qaeda, according to government records and current and former officials with firsthand knowledge of the matter.
Scott Forbes, who worked in the South Tower of the world trade center, witnessed a power-down of the tower in the weekend before 9/11.
GW: You've previously stated that on the weekend of September 8 and 9, 2001, there was a "power down" condition in world trade center Tower 2, the South Tower, and that this power down condition meant there was no electrical supply for approximately 36 hours from floor 50 up. Do you know what time the power-down started?
The circulating myth about Sept 11 attacks on the United States is that it was carried out by 19 Arab hijackers, masterminded by Al Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden, with no apparent motivation other than that they hate the U.S. freedoms.
Numerous analysts have repeatedly stated that the real perpetrators of this cartoon fantasy have constructed an elaborately woven web of delusions and unsubstantiated hearsay in order to promote this garbage across the media to the extent that a number of otherwise rational people have actually fallen under its spell.
Great article, make sure you follow the link and read the whole thing:
Late October NIST quietly released a final report about the two WTC towers. A report on the WTC 7 collapse has been postponed indefinitely. Not even a draft report has been released yet but NIST promises a "separate report" later. It is now 2005, going on 2006. Casual mention of the report release did not make it in most Mainstream Media. Do you find this strange for one of the largest public safety events in history where close to 3000 people perished? Do you feel safe being in a hi-rise building?
Thanks to Partridge for discovering this and Jon Gold for hosting it. Fast forward about 19 minutes to get to the good stuff:
Annie Machon, Former MI5 Officer:
The neocons have something called the Project for the New American Century in which in the year 2000 they laid out their arguments saying they wanted to go in and asset strip the middle east of oil and other resources but they didn't think they would be able to wage war without something like a new Pearl Harbor to generate the sort of outrage amongst the American public to allow them to go ahead and do that. So that might well be one view, I'm not necessarily the official government, but perhaps rogue elements within the government within the Republican party within the intelligence service banded together and did that.
"Ten days after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, President Bush was told in a highly classified briefing that the U.S. intelligence community had no evidence linking the Iraqi regime of Saddam Hussein to the attacks and that there was scant credible evidence that Iraq had any significant collaborative ties with Al Qaeda".
And yet Bush, Cheney and other top administration officials claimed and continue to claim that Saddam was behind 9/11. See this analysis. Indeed, Bush administration officials apparently swore in a lawsuit that Saddam was behind 9/11.
BYU Physics professor Steven Jones has stated that the government agency tasked with examining the collapse of the World Trade Centers did NOT investigate any anomalies in the collapse of the buildings, failing to even examine any evidence regarding the buildingsâ€™ impossible near free-fall speeds and symmetrical collapses, apparent demolition squibs, the fact that the buildings turned to dust in mid-air, the presence of molten metal in the basement areas in large pools in all of the buildings, or the unexplained straightening out of the upper 34 floors of the South Tower after they had precipitously leaned over and started toppling like a tree.
I had not seen this video before, despite it being hosted on reopen911.org. I was very impressed not only with Jimmy's ability to run through the subject matter in a short period of time, but the fact that the entire panel of the show was instantly interested in the material presented.
Thanks to The Professional for this:
Are You Sure Laughing at Conspiracy Theories Makes You Smart?
There are always really wacky or just plain factually challenged theories , and they never help either (which raises potential questions about the origins of those ideas). The only thing that matters, though, to the Conspiracy-mockers is the question: Does the Conspiracy Theory reflect badly on their beloved America (the concept, not the place or the people)? And this is crucial. If so, it is rejected out of hand as mere â€œanti-Americanism.â€ If the Conspiracy Theory, on the other hand, reflects well on their beloved America (the concept, not the place or the people), it gets the reverse treatment: blind and complete acceptance.
9-11 Probers Leave Questions Behind - Power Plays Blog
The private watchdog group formed by the former members of the 9-11 Commission is closing up shop. The announcement of its last media eventâ€”a December 5 briefing where the 9-11 Discourse Project "will issue its final assessment of progress on all 9/11 Commission recommendations"â€”came today. This is no surprise: The project (funded by entities like the Carnegie Corporation, the Drexel Family Foundation, and the Rockefeller Brothers Fund) was intended to last for just a year after the commission expired in August 2004, its mission to "educate the public on the issue of terrorism and what can be done to make the country safer." But even if this end was long planned, it doesn't mean everyone thinks the job is finished.
Barrie Zwicker's The Great Conspiracy - The 9/11 News Special You Never Saw is available through Google's video search. The quality is pretty high, and it appears to be the full length.
You can watch it here.
Be sure to check it out if you haven't before, and do some searches for other 9/11 videos as well.
Look what happens when you read the academic paper questioning the official version of the collapse of the three World Trade Center buildings that Brigham Young University physics professor Steven E. Jones recently posted at physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html.
Jones is an honest-to-goodness scientist whose specialties are metal-catalyzed fusion, solar energy and something called archaeometry. The 9,000-word abstract, part of a 2006 book called "The Hidden History of 9/11/2001," asks, "Why Indeed did the WTC Buildings Collapse?"
I've been going through some issues related to massive bandwidth usage over the last 2 days. Out of the blue we sent out 30-40GB of transfers in the last 2 days.
I am in the process of moving the server to a new host, so the next few days may be bumpy, but will pay off in the long term. With our new server we will have 15x the bandwidth, and 14x the storage.
Sorry for the downtime, it will all be straightened out soon enough.
There has never been a steel frame building that has ever collapsed as a result of fire. There have been numerous steel buildings that have had severe fires that burned for several hours but the buildings never collapsed. The towers were built to withstand 160 mile winds and the crash of a 707, a plane not much smaller than a 767. They were also heavily imbued with asbestos, a fire retardant. The South Tower collapsed at 9:59 AM after being hit at 9:03 AM (56 minutes). The North Tower collapsed at 10:28 AM after being hit at 8:46 AM (1 hour, 42 minutes).
Philanthropist Jimmy Walter Presents:
The New Pearl Harbor - Confronting the Evidence
Press Conference in Tampa to Launch a Genuine 9/11 Investigation, December
6th, 10:00AM, Don Vincente De Ybor Hotel
WHO: 9/11 experts Jimmy Walter, Morgan Reynolds, David Von Kleist, William Rodriguez, Joyce Riley, and Eric Hufschmid.
WHAT: A Real Investigation into What Happened on September 11, 2001.
This forum is an investigation into the following:
1. Why the Bush administration ignored warning signs about terrorist attacks.
2. Why they leaked classified information to the media.
3. Why members of the administration lied under oath and obstructed justice in an investigation about national security violations.
Spectacular article with loads of information in a small package. Touches on Operation Northwoods, Reichstag, fake terror, and the leaked memo discussing the need for a new terror attack to bolster support.
This article is great to open new eyes, spread it around, follow the link to get the whole article including all hyperlinks:
But could this happen in modern America? Initially, it is now fairly well-accepted that the Gulf of Tonkin Incident was a fabrication. See this article.
Bush administration Labor Dept. economist, Dr. Morgan Reynolds, and Eric Hufschmid, author of "Painful Questions", spell out clearly the evidence proving 9-11 was done by our government and agents from Israel.
Got a heads up tonight that Indira Singh recently did an interview with Michael Corbin on a radio show called 'A Closer Look' out of Colorado. I haven't had a chance to listen to the nearly 3 hour interview so I will just post the summary off of 4acloserlook.com:
1st and 2nd Hour:
Michael interviews Indira Singh, a whistleblower on 9/11. Indira links some very important facts in her investigation that leads to disturbing conclusions about who was behind 9/11 and why.
Here is a link to their download page:
Cory You sent in this strip today, thought it was pretty impressive art and worth sharing. You can check out his site at neoramen.com.
I had a few emails back and forth with him and it sounds like he would be more than willing to do more comics on the subject in the future. If any of y
Given the past few weeks' exciting news regarding Able Danger, and Professor Steven E. Jones, people have been starting to ask questions about what happened on that fateful day. We at 911Truth.org would like to ask anyone within the media, specifically, the "Friendly Media", Mike Malloy, Alex Jones, etc... to please contact us for interviews so we can inform people what it is they can do to help.
It is so amazing how much is being said lately about 9/11 each and every week. What is even more amazing is how the mainstream media continues to ignore the 9/11 elephant in the room. When I first started this blog I was worried that covering only new 9/11 related news would be to narrow a scope to be consistent, guess I was wrong.
So, kick back, relax, and catch up on a ton of 9/11 related stuff from this week.
Here is a bit more about Tucker Carlson's interview with the physics professor who put forth a paper claiming explosives were used to destroy the WTC on 9/11... just prior to the professor's appearance on Carlson's program, Tucker's guest was someone from the Weekly Standard (this guy was a regular guest).
Its been an incredible week, hopefully someone will pick up the torch:
The BYU professor, who thinks explosions most likely brought down the twin towers, is now limiting his media appearances to only 'peer reviews.' Read his last words to the media here in the Arctic Beacon.
The BYU physics professor who thinks explosions brought down the WTC said Wednesday he's "bowing out of the limelight" and limiting his media appearances to only academic peer reviews.
Conservative Professor Steven E. Jones has been barraged by media appearances since releasing a 19 page paper last week, saying "pre-positioned explosives" most likely brought down the twin WTC towers as well as WTC No. 7.