here is an article about wingtv.net and their recent '9/11 On Trial' series:
in reference to my post yesterday about Timothy McNiven.. here is a followup:
McNiven RICO SUIT! BUSH SENIOR, CIA head, & his 1976 state terror plan to hit WTCs!
"McNiven, who first went public in an affidavit included in a 9/11-related federal conspiracy (RICO) lawsuit filed against Bush and others in 2004, claims his unit was ordered to create the "perfect terrorist plan" using commercial airliners as weapons and the Twin Towers as their target.....publicized version of the study, commissioned by Congress, was to identify security lapses and submit corrective measures to lawmakers. However, McNiven claims the real purpose of the study was to brainstorm how to pull off the perfect terrorist attack using the exact same 9/11 scenario. "
anyways, download the interview here:
i ganked this from a site which is hosting a bunch of documentaries:
got a head's up from phil at letsroll911.org about a new website..
they have alot of free videos to download including a 20 minute short film that i hadnt seen before.. while it starts off a bit harsh, it is deifnately a well made introduction to several of the 'conspiracy' theories surrounding 9/11..
go here to download
welp, i was out sick for the later half of this week, so there is quite a bunch for me to catch up on.. here we go..
new Christopher Bollyn article:
THE HIDDEN HAND OF THE CIA - 9/11 and Popular Mechanics
OP-ED from The Nation on yahoo news:
Wolfowitz To Rule the World (Bank)
this is linked here primarily because it references wolfowitz's plans for iraq before 9/11, and how he continued to try to connect iraq to 9/11 as a motive for the war..
Just came across this site which is chronicleing a series of requests for the video footage of the Pentagon attack on 9/11. As most of you may know there were video tapes confiscated from both the on-site gas station as well as the nearby Sheraden hotel. There are also camera's all along the edge of the roof of the Pentagon, but I don't see reference to these in these requests.
The FOIA requests were denied due to ongoing criminal investigations, so the owner of this website has filed a lawsuit to try to get their hands on the footage.
This is a great effort, because whether you think the Pentagon was hit by Flight 77 or not, this could bring out new footage that proves, or disproves, the different theories..
the nice people over at 911CitizensWatch posted an article about Cynthia McKinney's recent discussion with Rumsfeld and Myers.. the article also has a link to c-span's archive where you can watch the footage itself:
Gen. Myers, Sec. Rumsfeld and DoD Comproller Grilled on Missing Money, War Games and Sex Trade
i saw cynthia mckinney on cspan last night.. it wasnt a rerun.. it said 'today' in the corner.. she was asking both rumsfeld and myers about the wargames, and they responded back.. i cant seem to find the transcript from the DoD's website or hers..
basically myers said the wargames helped the response time, not hurt it.. she also asked him if that day was declared a special day of intrest, to which he asked if she meant before or after the attacks, to which she said before.. he said he didnt know, then looked at rumsfeld and shook his head like he had no idea of what she was getting at..
if anyone knows where i might find the transcript please let me know..
alex jones released a clip from his daily radio show in response to the recent 'interview' with chertoff from popular mechanics on art bell's coast to coast.. you can listen to that clip here
Christopher Bollyn from American Free Press has released a new article (and has another about to be posted) continuing the feud that has erupted from the same popular mechanics magazine mentioned before..
Big day in terms of 9/11 related videos..
first off, the video 'Confronting the Evidence' from Jimmy Walters at reopen911.org is finished, and is on its way to press. he is giving away this 4+ hour DVD on 9/11 for free, as well as making it available for download. You can download the video and/or order your free dvd at the link below:
i came across this app today, and man is it cool.. basically it shows you a company, and its board of directors.. then from that board of directors you can see what other companies a person is a member of..
anyways, check it out.. it is really insightful in understanding how closely tied some corporations are.. be sure to use the 'load' function to load the most popular connections, such as how the energy companies relate, and a bunch of others..
anyways, i used it to make a real quick example of how Thomas Kean from the government's 9/11 investigation sat on the same board of directors with members of the Bush 1 administration, and the clinton adminsistration.. the picture links to a much larger example:
does it look like goss thinks we are actively searching for bin laden? it doesnt to me.. to me it looks like he thinks what bush is saying is a joke, and completely removed from the truth..
so, if we arent really searching for bin laden, why not? perhaps they know something they would rather the public not know, like we dont really want to find him, or we already have, or he is dead, etc..
i have just relocated my personal blog to this new address, 911blog.blogspot.com.. i have been blogging about 9/11 for about 5 months on my personal website.. i decided to move all of my 9/11 comments to a new site, one devoted to just 9/11 and apart from my other website..
leave some comments, ask some questions, and welcome!
the nice people over at WingTV have begun their series that covers the material from their recently released book focused on the collapses of WTC 1, 2, and 7.. i beleive this series will air one episode a day for at least a week or two.. should be good stuff to watch, especially if you havent bought the book..
you can find the videos archived as they come out on this page here:
i beleive the edited version only has the commercials cut out..
also, tonight on the Daily Show they had a clip where GW brought up bin-laden and how the CIA is working day in and day out to find him.. Goss gets a surprised/bewildered look on his face like 'really?'.. if anyone has a link to this clip please hook me up :)
i stayed up last night from midnight til 4am to listen to the head researcher of the recent popular mechanics article be interviewed by art bell on 'coast to coast'..
after 3 1/2 hours of going over the article, and talking down about anyone and everyone, there was 30 minutes of actual discussion.. i was blown away by the incredibly biased conversation that i sat through.. they received a call at the begining by Lisa Guliani, she asked a great question, but art said chertoff wasnt on the line yet, and never brought her question up to chertoff..
of the few callers who did get in, a few asked decent questions, or made decent comments.. and to those chertoff said they hadnt researched it.. it was quite apparent that asside from the 16 points in the article (that they spent 3 1/2 hours going over), they had little to no knowledge of anything else, including the 6-8 highjackers who are still alive.. they had never heard of that, and doubted its credibility, showing they really dont know much in the great scope of 9/11 oddities.
ust got hit with some links (thanks phil) that are pretty interesting.. art bell, whom i think most ppl have heard of, is having the 'senior researcher' Ben Chertoff on his show tonight (3/5/2005)..
Christopher Bollyn from American Free Press apparently has been hawking on Chertoff, 'head researcher' of the Popular Mechanics article 'debunking' the major myths of 9/11..
wow.. i got a link last night to this video, and it is really really impressive.. the graphics in it are free-flowing vector graphis, and its focus is on the war on terrorism, PNAC, and the motives for wanting war..
this is just a great video, impressive stuff:
Why has the journalistic community chosen to downplay the latest 9/11 Commission Report?
It's the media who need to raise the heat on this matter, Why haven't they? It seems as if most of the journalists today are either scared cowards, frauds, or paid for by the administration, which is to say corporate conglomerate ownership. It's confusing and downright frightening.
This is just one example. There are so many. What has gone awry with the media? I'm perplexed, confused, and worried.
welp, its been a few days since my last post.. so i figured i would make a quick post on a few things of interest..
first off, a law suit revolving around two briefings which were classified after they were already public record has been settled.. the arguement was that the feds improperly claimed national security to re-classify the information, when in actuality they were just trying to coverup things that made them look bad..
the guys over at reopen911.org sent out an email letting me know they are about to wrap up their free dvd offer.. this guy Jimmy Walter has invested close to 3 million trying to spread the word about the lies and coverup surrounding 9/11.. he is giving away free dvd's, so go order yourself a copy before they go off to manufacturing..
here is an article in the LA Times about the newly released FAA warnings.. I love how the media is constantly berating the FAA for not following up on the warnings when the warnings obviously would have come from some other intelligence agency, not the FAA.
there is some aditional commentary here:
here is the commentary:
Increasing numbers now believe that based on mounting credible evidence it goes beyond the criminal negligence suggested here by Robert Scheer. Evidence from whistleblowers and others ignored by the Commission now demands that Americans and the world at least seriously consider the possibility of willful criminal complicity by individuals with vested interests within the U.S. government or by U.S. government contractors who stood to gain immensely (and did) from the attack. Instead of these individuals being investigated or held responsible they have been let off the hook or in many cases given promotions and rewards for their 'incompetence' or 'criminal negligence'.