C.S.I. 9/11 Anchorage, Alaska
Josef Princiotta Tue, 01/01/2008 - 2:48am
A weekly presentation in Anchorage, Alaska.
C.S.I. 9/11
No conspiracy theory.
No politics.
No debating hypotheticals.
We discuss only the facts that are beyond any doubt.
The weights and measures and the math and physics
of the three towers destruction and the anomalies of the Pentagon damage.
We prove explosive horizontal pressure waves.
We review the book "Without Precedent" by Lee Hamilton and Thomas Kean
EVERY TUESDAY 7 - 8 PM
A.T.O.M. Meeting Center
4025 Raspberry at Jewel Lake
Anchorage, Alaska
(907) 562-6306
No Admission Charge
- Login to post comments
It takes an internet
Yah, science is fine, but people don't shift worldview over the melting point of steel. They'd rather live in illusions. I'm sorry to break the news.
If we don't provide a viable political/psychological 'frame' in which the scientific facts could have happened, then proof does 9-11 Truth no good. The main resistance to 9-11 Truth is psychological, not scientific.
So I commend this effort, but sideways insults at other analyses are self-defeating. It's tiresome hearing 9-11 bloggers parrot MSM airhead agitprop terms expecting admiration for it. Just do your thing and contribute your part.
Mr. Princiotta - Please don't limit yourselves
to only the controlled demolitions at the WTC and the Pentagon questions. You can also look into the probability of the put-options and the anomalies regarding FAA protocols and NORAD response (or lack of same), as well as the military exercises (especially the one going on at the NRO that morning). Finally, taking a critical look at the orgins and activities of the alleged hijackers and Able Danger is also worthwhile line of factual inquiry.
I highly recommend the Elsevier book The Hidden History of 9-11-2001, edited by Paul Zarembka, as an invaluable resource for your presentations.
Best of luck and please let us know how it goes.
I hope that you and yours are well.
The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.
My daydream.
The really ironic thing about your concept is that it would be a guaranteed hit if someone had the testicular fortitude to bring this idea to prime time television. The curiosity factor alone would attract everyone to watch the drama unfold, regardless of their preconceived bias.
Imagine the excitement created every week as people anticipate which way the argument will turn or what new evidence will be produced, when they tune in the following week.
Imagine the office water cooler debates that would ensue as a result.
Imagine the spin masters in high (read low) places scrambling to react to new revelations.
Imagine politicians and journalists having to choose between ducking for cover or stepping up to claim their previously harbored suspicions.
Hey. I can dream can't I?