Article on Upcoming 9/11 Congressional Hearing Being Aired on CSPAN

C-SPAN/2 BROADCAST OF CONGRESSWOMAN'S BRIEFING ON 9-11

C-SPAN/2 will be broadcasting McKinney's full event on August 31, 2005 from 8:00 pm to 11:30 pm and from 8:00 pm to 1:00 am on September 2, 2005. It is broken into two parts as described here.

Regardless of your political party, I encourage everyone to watch this briefing:

(1) to look at what hard evidence is available;

(2) the sources of such documentation and whether or not it is credible;

(3) to hear what the family members who lost a loved one that day have to say in their speeches.
..
9-11 is a day none of us will ever forget. I will never forget watching the news coverage from just after the first plane hit one of the World Trade Center Towers until around 11:00 pm that night and then for many days afterwards. As I work at home, I was able to watch coverage almost non stop. Yes, 9-11 is a very touchy subject, but, I urge all Americans:

Don't let any president, member of Congress, talk radio or cable TV show host tell you how to think about 9-11 or any other subject.

Don't let anyone tell you what you should think about 9-11 or any other subject.

Watch this briefing and make up your own mind.

If you have questions, don't they deserve answers?

The article is a scurrilous

The article is a scurrilous piece of trash that calls Cynthia McKinney "pro-sodomy." Her membership in the "anti-American" Progressive Caucus is "wrong."

i agree with the assesment

i agree with the assesment above...pro-sodomy...is that a reference to being for equal rights for gays?
and the anti-american progressive caucus??? I doubt it

but give her kudos for acknowledging the FDR/Pearl Harbor lie and the concept of war for natural resources under the guise of freedom and democracy..ie iraq and afghanistan.

Off topic. Does anyone here

Off topic. Does anyone here know of any opinions or review by 9/11 truth researchers regarding the National Geographic "Inside 9/11" show that was on TV? I walked by my living room last night while my mother was watching some of it -- and, all I could hear was "the 19 highjackers" etc. I didn't want to waste my time watching propaganda.... but, I am curious to read a review by somebody in the 9/11 truth movement.

I think that was an honest

I think that was an honest article by someone who is a moderate.

i did not see the national

i did not see the national geographic peice.. i am hoping to get my hands on it.

National Geographic "Inside

National Geographic "Inside 9/11"

i stopped watching before the first part finished. i have it recorded and may watch the rest but i doubt it.

they towed a very careful line as far as i could tell, not going too far in revealing anything controversial, but at the same time reinforcing the official line.

i gave up when they started talking about Hani Hanjour, the supposed pilot of flight 77. All they mentioned was that when he went to school, he already had his license (which was true) but fail to mention he was absolutely incompetent as a pilot and never could have performed the manuveur.

i was going to document all the information they missed or left out but it would've been a damn novel

Thanks for the mini-review

Thanks for the mini-review rayrayjones -- doesn't sound worth watching at all. What pisses me off is how documentaries like this sound so authoritarian, as if god were speaking the truth.

Not surprising.... just more reason to withdraw from mainstream ANYTHING. LOL