Re: Where's the Israeli Truth Movement?

Ask Noam Choamsky, that shill's silence has been deafening.

Well, Jon, you see, one way of looking at people in the 911 truth movement, such as it is, is that some are motivated by love of Constitution while others are primarily motivated by hate/revenge (ie, get the bastards who did this to us).

And some people suspect/hate Jews/Israelis enough to conclude that we can blame them for 9/11 despite a lack of evidence -- they even embrace full-of-911-lies "Dancing Israelis" stories, even though it consists largely of innuendo which proves nothing, and pattern recognition suggests that it represents little more than a parallel cover story for the real perpetrators.

Blaming Jews (or "Zionists"; a 'code' word carelessly tossed around and thus now too ill-defined to mean much of anything [or something different to everyone], but often misused simply to mean "Jews") is as old as the hills, and some people will always be suckers for it (and perhaps even useful idiots to the Rapture crowd, who need Jews in Israel for all 3 acts of their apocalyptic 4-act play). I've heard folks such as Alex Jones join in deriding "these guys", like Chomsky, for having a last name ending in "Y". In other words, there are 911 truthers for whom limited-hangout types and those who still don't fully get it about 9/11 are deserving of special treatment and attention depending upon their surname. (What crap that is!)

Is the CIA a monolithic entity, with all its members in total agreement? How about the FBI? (Obviously not!) So why should we expect Moussad to be any better/different, other than the fact that lazy thinkers illogically cling to labels? If our government can be corrputed from within, why do the Jew-suspecters, who deride anyone who even suggests that Jews are in any way somehow superior to non-Jews, believe that Israel is somehow immune from such rotten subversive internal influences? (Methinks they have a self-fulfilling, self-contradicting belief set.)

Please keep in mind that the real 9/11 perps are masters at hiding behind institutions (including religions), which wind up holding the bag for the crimes of the luciferian illuminati criminals, for whom we do not even have good labels. And resorting to religious-based labels will spell doom for the 911 truth movement: The largest/major religions are, by definition, divisive. They serve to separate the believers from non-believers. IOW, "us" from "them". That is how religions are used by the luciferians, whose favorite tactic has traditionally been "divide and conquer". And we are all well-trained to see and use religion divisively -- religion is the epitome of "us vs them disease".

There is, however, an "ism" which is better-defined and works for me when it comes to 9/11: FASCISM: Note that the age-old struggle for rights and freedoms between individuals and the State has been lost, and corporations have won.

http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=fascist&x=0&y=0

(Note that this definition doesn't mention corporate wealth/power; it would have us believe that we're still stuck in the centuries-old struggle between the individual and the State. But don't expect the people who really run the world and print our textbooks and dictionaries to just hand us the tools [labels] we need to unseat and deal with them.)

NeoCons are better described as NeoFascists. But, as always, the powerful bad guys have provided us with cloudy/muddy labels for our (mis)use...
_______________________________________