Conspiracy Theories Surrounding Sept. 11

http://www.tucsonweekly.com/gbase/Opinion/Content?oid=oid:76056

...
The parallels between WTC and JFK are interesting. The two events were so startling, so surreal and so profound in their lasting impacts on our society that they serve as cultural and historical icons. Every one of us who was alive and paying attention remembers exactly where we were when we heard the news. Most of us quickly formed emotional and deeply held perceptions and beliefs around them. Small wonder, then, that it's so difficult for people to debate them calmly and rationally.

Another factor is persistent mystery. Official investigations failed to produce believable explanations. The Warren Commission, with its infamous "Magic Bullet" theory, has been completely discredited. And the Federal Emergency Management Agency, of recent Katrina infamy, spent a mere $600,000, relying mostly on volunteers, to investigate the collapse of the towers. (This from a government that spent $40 million investigating a consensual blowjob in the White House.)

Few believe that we'll ever get the whole stories. But many believe that they have not just the right, but the duty, to try, if for no other reason than to set the record straight, but also to help prevent such events from recurring. Such are the people who organized and attended the Conspiracy Party: a few activists, an accountant, a doctor, the neighbors--people shrewd enough to realize that the official explanations of what happened on Sept. 11 stink to hog heaven and curious enough to seek the truth.

Unfortunately, the conspiracy buffs who usually get the most attention are Lyndon LaRouche followers who maintain that Satan's emissary, in the form of Dick Cheney, called up demons from hell to crash the planes and hypnotize Congress into supporting ill-advised wars (again, this would explain a lot, but ...).

We watched some videos with production values roughly akin to a horror flick I made with some buddies in high school, discussed some interesting angles and left the party still scratching our heads. But the point, for the time being, was served: to ask the questions that should be asked of any such crime. Who had the means? Who had the motive? Who stood to gain from it? Because at its root, no matter how complex (not everyone who cashes in sits in a smoke-filled room concocting the plot), every conspiracy is fundamentally the same: a conspiracy of profit, as measured in money, power, political objectives or (usually) all of the above.

I believe there was a complex conspiracy at work on Sept. 11 involving, among others, some powerful elements of the U.S. government. But hey, I'm just a conspiracy buff. Don't take my word for it. Go to 911research.com and start figuring it out for yourself.

too bad the link he cites

too bad the link he cites doesn't work...

its a formatting error by

its a formatting error by the webmaster. should be http://www.911research.com (a mirror of Jim Hoffman's http://911research.wtc7.net/)

> The parallels between WTC

> The parallels between WTC and JFK are interesting.

indeed. The "method" is similar:

1) stand down
2) cover-up (MUST! FOR EVER!)
3) top military, top SECRET (dis-)"SERVICE"

watch "PERSPECTIVES on 911 by Ken Jenkins"

> ... historical icons. Every
> one of us ... remembers exactly
> where we were when we heard the news.

not important! it just comes with being public.
a) many covert operations are FAR MORE brutal
and spectacular, AND INFLUENTIAL!
b) it can back-fire for the criminals.

> Small wonder, then, that it's so
> difficult for people to debate them
> calmly and rationally.

why? We can. watchme do it.

> Another factor is persistent mystery.

jeez, stating the obvious. Why confuse the issues.
There is no mystery. It is a FALSE FLAG, covert
operation, and the truth is not a mystery, its
so damn obvious... OIL, MONEY

> Few believe that we'll ever get the whole stories.

Did we get the whole story of the 11 september 1973
coup? yes we did. To say we cannot, is defeatist.

> to help prevent such events from recurring.

the hypocrisy is monumental.

Alone the use of the english language is enough
of "preventing deconstruction"... you are using
THEIR terms... you fall in THEIR traps.

> the official explanations of what
> happened on Sept. 11 stink to hog heaven

if they stink so much, why does anyone care
to smell them? The hypocrisy is to say:
uuh it stinks, but hey, I am taking another sniff.

> and curious enough to seek the truth.

idiotic. EVERYONE is curious. There are NO
human beings, or animals that are not curious.
I bet even plants are curious. The TRUTH is the
topic. Brains are trained liars and the reason WHY
(deconstruct!@#$%) is the thing.. we re curious about.

So, you Miracle-Mericans, file a law-suit.
EVERYONE! get the Attorneys involved.

> Lyndon LaRouche followers

there are not many of them. Larouche wants a cushy
govt job, like his wife Helpa in germany.

> Satan's emissary, in the form of Dick Cheney,
> called up demons from hell to crash the planes
> and hypnotize Congress into supporting ill-advised
> wars (again, this would explain a lot, but ...).

thats actually not that far fetched. If "Satan"
is the "in-escapable logic of Money and Oil" and
"demons from hell" are covert operators ... then
that is actually highly accurate.

> Who had the means?

Joint Chiefs of Staff

> Who had the motive?

Joint Chiefs of Staff

> Who stood to gain from it?

Joint Chiefs of Staff

in the US of Angst ... NOTHING happens without them.

Henry Shelton must face the firing squad.. first.

http://www.question911.com ha

http://www.question911.com
has a good amount of downloads for those who want. Perhaps something to add to the links?

yeah, i would like to see

yeah, i would like to see the new Loose Change put up on question911.com