time to torrent???

LOL, jk

WTF?

That's probably not a good thing.

Great job Dylan and company. Looks like you've done an excellent job in getting basically all information there is out there and presenting it to people who initially don't want to do all the research.

Did you also cover the pyroclastic clouds?, like:
http://www.plaguepuppy.net/public_html/video%20archive/pyroclastic_flow.avi
(can anyone tell me which video this part is of?)

Things I'd really like to see myself are:
* Good computer simulations of the towers. Even without the official plans should it be possible to run some pretty realistic simulations. A nice simulation would be what would happen if you would kill all the strenght of three storeys.
* Where are all the controlled demolition experts of this world? They should be able to conclusively state what happened here and why. Or all they all connected to Controlled Demolition Inc?

I will get this DVD after christmas.
Thank you guys so much. Man I'm geeked after just reading the review.

Where can I download a copy without having to wait for a snail-mail copy? I need a copy asap. I would love to show it to my 9/11 truth group this afternoon at our meeting in SF. I could burn it to a cd or play it through a laptop and a LCD projector. Quick I need help now.

Thanks for the quick reply. I guess we will all have to wait but thanks anyhow.

Hey guys, I've been posting comments here and there, and since I figure alot of people are going to view this review this may be a good spot to tell you all a little about me. Next month I'll be 25. I live in Ohio with my girlfriend and her daughter. About 8 months now I've been with you guys. I've seen all the documentries (except the new ones). I visit all the sites(911blogger, letsroll911, whatreallyhappened, nineoneone.nl is a good one lots of videos and there from Amsterdam!, ect...) So far I've changed quite a few minds about 911. Some Iknewould see this stuff and say " yeah man thats some crazy shit, I knew our government might of had something to do with it." Most of the people I talk to and share this stuff with agree that these questions need answers. But then there are the few who no matter what you say or do they still ain't going to change there mind. Case in point, my 2 bosses at work. Both are republicans and love Bush to death. Before I noticed this stuff about 911 I was big into the anti-Bush stuff, and no matter what I said or did I could not get them to see the light when it comes to Bush.Same thing with 911. The other day I was talking to one of them and he said to me "Mike you're not goint to change my mind on this." And I said "Pete I'm not going to stop trying to change your mind." I gave him a copy of the free dvd from reopen911.org. He said he watch some of it. I told him to go back and watch the painful questions part and then come back to me and we would talk. When I get LC2 I'm passing that out to everybody and there mom.

Well thanks for reading this. I feel like I know some of you guys because you changed the way I thought our government worked, so I figured I would tell alittle of myself.

I do have a question. In a earlier post here on 911blogger titled "Evidence of Demolition Charges In WTC 2" it says ""Somewhere around the middle of the World Trade Center, there was this orange and red flash coming out. Initially it was just one flash. Then this flash just kept popping all the way around the building and that building had started to explode." My question is how come we can't see this on any video? We all see the squibs, but none of this stuff.

One last thing before I go. About building 7 and the people that may think that the damage done to it caused it to collapse. One only has to look at the Oklahoma City building. It had 1/3 to 1/2 of that building blown away, and with concrete construction which if I'm not mistaken is weaker than steel. So why didn't that building collapse???
Thank you all.

im still waiting for the FBI to release the surviellence tapes outside the Murrah building that would prove there were arabs with him.i guess i'll still be waiting for that one along with the pentagon tapes........

and along with the FBI files that would prove TWA800 was an al-qaeda(Ramzi Yousef) job and not "technical problems"..............

the amount of corruption is staggering, thats why 9/11 is so hard to prove to people.its almost as if most amercians dont care how corrupt and shadowy their government is as long as it doesnt directly affect them.we have to make them see that it does.its all done in OUR names,the crimes, the cover-ups, the murder.its all done in OUR names.

I wounder if dz realizes he posted hes review at 9:11 pm? I've noticed that I tend to look at the clock alot right when it hits 9:11.

mike,

thats for the introduction, nice to meet you.. and good point about the OKC building.. i never thought about how it didnt collapse after half the building was blown out.. although i am quite familiar with the other details of it..

as for the red flashes in the nytimes tapes released.. if you watch any demolition videos you can see them if the explosives are set near the outer edges of the buildings, but in the case of the WTC towers the explosives would have to have been on the central core columns, meaning that unless you had a clear view through a window or something like that then you probably wouldnt see the flashes the eye witnesses reported..

a good video example is the dome destruction footage.. the explosives are on the outer edges, and you can see these flashes.. but in other videos where the explosives are internal the flashes cant be seen from far away..

C,

you will like the cleveland section then, because it goes much further than just the report about 93 landing there..

Mike,
No shit? I do that ALL the time! =D
And I noticed that, too...just didnt point it out...figured it was intentional.

Dylan who you got in the Gaints/Cowgirls game??

And are you guys READY FOR SOME FOOTBALL!!!???

Hi Dylan,

after reading this review and learning that Cleveland is a major point, I hope I will soon be able to watch the movie.

It's my firm opinion that the shoot-down of Flight 93 (that never happened) was the biggest distraction right from the beginning.

Just go to Shanksville, PA, and ask the people what they have observed. I'm sure that many of them know that the official crash story is wrong. But they prefer to believe in the "small" government secret (shoot-down) rather the "big" secret (MIHOP). This is what I call distraction.

Woody

Woody,
I'm glad you posted. I need your country man! I took the address you gave me to the post office and they had no clue where to send it. Can you re-mail me your complete address, so you can see it for yourself? =D
-Dylan

Hey Mike,
thanks for the intro. The flashes wrapping around the building- I thought I had seen that but more than likely I had simply envisioned it while listening to the audio's or reading the reports on one of my many all night research efforts. The image that I have is it was at about floor 30 the explosions started in the middle on one face of the tower then split into two and the two flashes wrapped around the building.
As far as not being able to change everyones mind. I don't bother trying too hard to persued people on the issue, I like quantity over quality meaning I'd rather tell ten people a little of the truth than spend that time wasted trying to convince one bush-moron.
Even without 9-11 issues With all that has gone wrong I can't believe there are still those that drive with that f*ckin stupid*ss W sticker! The idiot-leader was in Phoenix last week to raise money for Senator Kyl. There were 1300 morons with enough cash to pay $1000 to listen to his dribble. Ugh!!

Dylan when are the dvd's shipping?

BTW Thanks for the response after I posted I had went back to your site and spent more time thumbing through it. There I found the answer with pics of it all going down. You guys did do well with the exception of “There are millions of unanswered questions..." I think that it's actually only in the hundreds. LOL

When you guys were in NYC for 9-11 this year. Were strickly at GZ or did you take part in the media protest?

Run...
Yea well...what can I say. I was a little nervous.
As for 9-11, we stuck to Ground Zero. We felt the protest was a limited hangout; we wanted to be down at the WTC where it mattered.

So if I read the review correctly DylanCo proposes that there was NO shootdown of flt 93 over PA? I felt this was widely accepted, with rumsfeld himself slipping up about it.

It's flight 77, the "pentagon plane" which Hufschmid and others propose landed in Cleveland, replaced by a global hawk drone which was flown into the pentagon. See the "pentagon" sections of Painful Questions at reopen911.org; where Hufschmid proposes all the switching around with flt 77 landed at cleveland, TPTB's killing everyone, and providing burned bodies to examiners to "identify", bodies supposedly recovered from the Pentagon crash.

SOMETHING crashed in PA, no? With debris over several miles? You're saying... what are you saying??

SOMETHING crashed in PA, no? With debris over several miles? You're saying... what are you saying??
Poopy | 12.04.05 - 5:14 pm | #
yeah, i cant sqaure that part either.

"we wanted to be down at the WTC where it mattered."

True that the protest didn't even make it on the news I don't think it was a wasted effort.

I'm curious to see your footage of the events at GZ as I decided to stay away from because of the ceremonies and the emotions tied to the site.

SOMETHING crashed in PA, no? With debris over several miles? You're saying... what are you saying??

i think a missle was fired into the ground in shanksville.

All I know is there is absolutely no physical trace of Flight 93 at Shanksville, PA, and all of the alleged huge pieces of debris have NEVER been photographed.
All we have is a crater in the ground, and some light debris, which was in the first edition.
I've gone through the scenario in my mind a million times, and I firmly believe what Woody so excellently surmizes:

"It's my firm opinion that the shoot-down of Flight 93 (that never happened) was the biggest distraction right from the beginning.

Just go to Shanksville, PA, and ask the people what they have observed. I'm sure that many of them know that the official crash story is wrong.
But they prefer to believe in the "small" government secret (shoot-down) rather the "big" secret (MIHOP). This is what I call distraction."

Watch LC2E, see the footage, before you make any judgements.

"i think a missle was fired into the ground in shanksville."

What of the reported ground witnesses in PA who made claims about seeing the plane come down in pieces?
http://911research.wtc7.net/planes/evidence/eyewitness.html

So, what is the theory proposed by LC2 as to 77 and 93? I gather it's saying 93 landed in cleveland. What does it say happened to 77? I also gather LC2 suggests pentagon was hit by a cruise missile.. though I find Hufscmid's notion that it was a global hawk/UAV painted will AA stripes, with an explosive nose cone, was flown into the pentagon, a more plausible theory which helps account for the numerous varying eyewitness accounts of what they saw/heard/smelled wrt the pentagon.

The interview with Dylan has him saying that the WTC towers fell at free fall speed. Not so. They fell at near free fall speed, but that has been estimated at 12 - 16 seconds, not 8 seconds, more or less.
I understand how this misconception arises. The falling rubble creates and expanding dust "tail" behind it, which eventually completely encircles both towers (respectively). This rubble is falling at free fall speed. However, this rubble is falling faster than the building itself is being demolished. Unfortunately, I can't easily find the photo I had examined previously, but if you look around on the internet you should be able to find one with which you will be able to count about 20 floors between the BOTTOM of the falling rubble and the edge of the tower that is STILL COMPLETETLY INTACT.
See http://911research.wtc7.net/ for a discussion of actual collapse times.