9/11 Conspiracies Mentioned on Fox?

I got an interesting email today from JaneDoe regarding an interview with Christopher Young on the Neil Cavuto show on the 27th. Apparently Cavuto was out for the holidays and was being filled in for by someone else. She caught the brief interview on tape, and transcribed this brief transcript:

Interviewer: "I believe, I've checked out your material, here, and I believe you believe you think that 9/11 was a conspiracy by the US military, and it was used as a pretext... it was done by the US military, it was used as a pretext to go to war in Afghanistan and Iraq. Are you that conspiracy theorist?"

[Christopher Young starts to calmly explain until the interviewer interrupts him again.]
"Well, ...I'm just addressing specific facts ...that need to be addressed in regards to the 9/11 commission not addressing specific facts, such as..." (then he gets cut off)

Interviewer: "You see, the reason I've raised the issue, Christopher, the reason I've raised the issue, is that conspiracy theorists always believe that there are forces below the surface that shape events. Conspiracy theorists often believes that THEY are out to get YOU. You feel that way?

Young: "I believe a torch has been passed to bring light, where the truth has not been seen... "

Interviewer: "Do you think that maybe you could be accused of being paranoid?"

Young: "If you go to my web site, wheretovote.com ,..."

Interviewer: "When you start to get involved people question, ya know, where you're coming from. You know what I mean, Christopher?"

I'm kind of curious why they would have this Christopher Young guy on the show, unless the whole purpose was to bash him and make those that question 9/11 look like morons, not that I would be surprised.

It's not much, but perhaps emailing Cavuto with some hard-hitting facts could spark more in the future.

Thank you for your kind

Thank you for your kind comments, please kept up the good fight. If you can ask Mr. Cavuto if he will have Chris Young back on the air, not like but worth a try.

sincerely,
Chris Young
401-789-0029

http://p6.hostingprod.com/@wh

Dear Mr. Cavuto, Kudos to

Dear Mr. Cavuto,

Kudos to your fill-in interviewer on December 27th for
even allowing ANY discussion WHATSOEVER of some of the
glaringly weird facts surrounding the events of 911.
He was interviewing office-seeker Christopher Young.
Here is an excerpt:

Interviewer: "I believe, I've checked out your
material, here, and I believe you believe you think
that 9/11 was a conspiracy by the US military, and it
was used as a pretext... it was done by the US
military, it was used as a pretext to go to war in
Afghanistan and Iraq. Are you that conspiracy
theorist?"

Young: "Well, ...I'm just addressing specific facts
...that need to be addressed in regards to the 9/11
commission not addressing specific facts, such as..."
(then he gets cut off)

Interviewer: "You see, the reason I've raised the
issue, Christopher, the reason I've raised the issue,
is that conspiracy theorists always believe that there
are forces below the surface that shape events.
Conspiracy theorists often believes that THEY are out
to get YOU. You feel that way?

Young: "I believe a torch has been passed to bring
light, where the truth has not been seen... "

Interviewer: "Do you think that maybe you could be
accused of being paranoid?"

Mr. Cavuto, millions of people worldwide think 911 was
an inside job. The facts are simply too In-Your-Face
to think anything otherwise!

So I thought I would write to ask you if you would
publish a piece about the 911 anomalies since no one
else in the mainstream media has the guts to touch the
subject. I think they must be a little PARANOID!

Hopefully, you already follow developments in the 911
Truthosphere but if you don't, recently BYU Physics
Professor Steven E. Jones wrote a paper which
discusses his reasons for wanting an independent
investigation to re-examine the World Trade Center
collapses which would include the testable and
falsifiable hypothesis that explosives were used in
all three collapses.

http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html

Links are included to Dr. James Fetzer's recent paper
and to David Ray Griffin's paper on the WTC collapses
(be sure to read Griffin's paper).

I find it incredible that the mainstream media does
not write about this subject in any depth or with any
powers of acute reasoning. The best we gotten recently
has been the Village Voice article the had a decidedly
skeptical slant which asked 10 questions about the
events of 911. One of them, for example, was 'Why did
WTC7 collapse?' Is there anything paranoid about
asking this question and wanting an answer?. Why did
World Trade Center Building 7 collapse, Mr. Cavuto?
You're in the press aren't you? Can't you find out
why?

To date, no official explanation as been advanced for
the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7. It's
been four years now. This is getting to be really
ridiculous. No steel-frame buildings such as #7 had
ever collapsed due to fire before in history. Surely
this has profound implications to the building trade.
Does this mean that we no longer have to hire the
Controlled Demolition, Incorporateds of the world to
neatly demolish large structures within their own
footprints - that all we have to do now is flood a
joint with kerosene and throw a match on it? After
all, it apparently worked great on 911.

A few months ago, David Ray Griffin spoke to large
crowds in Central Park about the strange events of 911
and called upon the New York Times to delve into the
strange collapse of WTC7 as a way to atone for it's
failure to monitor and fully vett the alarmist
articles of Judith Miller building up to the Iraq War.
Not a word of reply from the Times. Could the Times be
PARANOID about discussing the three steel-frame
building collapses on 9-11-01?

I think it is commendable an office-seeker such as
Christopher Young to write a reasonable article about
the media neglect of the anomalies of 911 without
becoming unreasonably identified as a conspiracy
theorist or otherwise ruining his career credibility.
Once one has been acquainted with some simple facts -
such as the unexplained collapse of WTC7, or the
unbelievably high temperatures of the rubble and the
molten metal that was found for weeks afterwards in
all three rubble piles, or the impossibility of the
near freefall collapses of the Twin Towers - one can
only marvel that the media has been so universal in
its paranoic avoidance of them.

Disgustedly,

Carl Nelson
St. Petersburg, FL

From the link above: Young

From the link above:

Young also points out that there are many unanswered questions regarding September 11th that have yet to be seriously addressed. These are serious questions that were not addressed by the 911 commission into the attacks that were used to push us into war that has caused the lives of over 2000 American soldiers. Specifically, as to the 911 commission findings, why were facts omitted in their investigation such as the discovery of molten steel found in the basement of building 7 and the Twin Towers? Engineers have stated that jet fuel could never reach the temperature to melt steel. Only certain types of thermite explosives could achieve this. In regards to building 7, the third building to fall in the trade center complex, how was that building self imploded the day of the attacks when it would take explosives engineers weeks to position explosives to implode that building? It brings up the question that these explosives had already been installed in that building. FEMA, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, has retracted their statement that they knew why Building 7 fell; now FEMA states that they are unsure. There is also question as to video evidence released by CNN News, that shows an object attached to the plane that hit one of the towers in the world trade center complex and puts into question whether or not this was an American Airlines plane or a military aircraft, as discussed in a documentary titled “In Plane Sight” by William Lewis.

***

I like this kind of stuff that shows that our efforts weren't in vain.

Go Mr. Young!

nice email carl!

nice email carl!

who is this Young guy? and

who is this Young guy? and how in the hell did he get 9/11 on Fox News?