http://www.911truthseekers.blogspot.com

i kind of tweaked my spreadsheet modeling various pancake collapse times. I know my model isn't even realistic, but you can be confident that a pancake collapse could not occur faster than what it shows. it is biased in the gov'ts favor. I leave out all structural support resistance and air resistance. Even then, the WTC buildlings fell faster than what it shows a sheer pancake gravity collapse would in a vacuum. This proves that the falling mass wasn't encountering stationary objects on the way down. It proves the demolition wave preceded the falling mass if only by split seconds.

to show the cognitive disidence going on in the academic community, I talked with the same physics professor who gave me the formulas to use, and he said something like "yes the findings are correct, but we can't really be sure of the time of the collapses because they always show it in slow motion." and then he later said the collapses would have come down the same speed from a jet impact and fire, as from a controlled demolition! How can he believe that? he is saying a structurall intact buildling collapses at the same speed as one that is being blown up?

without air resistance, something falls from 1350 feet in ((1350*64)^.5)/32.1 = 9.16 seconds.

the collapses took a second or two longer than that.

anyone know how to find the exact time of each collapse? does any gov't report mention to time each collapse took?

i heard somewhere that each floor was made to handle 6 times its own weight. can anyone verify that?

thanks

Hey Dantastic, check out 911 Eyewitness, they go into extreme detail with the collapses, your answer should be in there...

Bin Laden Tape Probably Faked by CIA:
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0601/S00167.htm